World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
33
Citations
3240
World Ranking
2528
National Ranking
1

Darjan Karabasevic publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Darjan Karabasevic sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 126 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Darjan Karabasevic D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Darjan Karabasevic sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • A framework for the Selection of a packaging design based on the SWARA method

    Dragisa Stanujkic;Darjan Karabasevic;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas

  • THE USE OF THE PIVOT PAIRWISE RELATIVE CRITERIA IMPORTANCE ASSESSMENT METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE WEIGHTS OF CRITERIA

    Florentin Smarandache;Dragisa Stanujkic;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Darjan Karabasevic

  • The Framework for the Selection of Personnel Based on the SWARA and ARAS Methods Under Uncertainties

    Darjan Karabasevic;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Zenonas Turskis;Dragisa Stanujkic

  • An extension of the WASPAS method for decision-making problems with intuitionistic fuzzy numbers: a case of website evaluation

    Dragiša Stanujkić;Darjan Karabašević

  • An Approach to Personnel Selection in the Tourism Industry Based on the SWARA and the WASPAS Methods

    Snezana Urosevic;Darjan Karabasevic;Dragisa Stanujkic;Mladjan Maksimovic

  • An approach to personnel selection based on Swara and Waspas methods

    Darjan Karabasevic;Dragisa Stanujkic;Snezana Urosevic;Mladjan Maksimovic

  • A Neutrosophic Extension of the MULTIMOORA Method

    Dragisa Stanujkic;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Florentin Smarandache;Willem Karel M. Brauers

  • Ranking of companies according to the indicators of corporate social responsibility based on SWARA and ARAS methods

    Darjan Karabašević;Jane Paunkovic;Dragiša Stanujkić

  • Selection of candidates in the mining industry based on the application of the SWARA and the MULTIMOORA methods

    Darjan Karabasevic;Dragisa Stanujkic;Mladjan Maksimovic;Snezana Urosevic

  • An Integrated Simple Weighted Sum Product Method—WISP

    Dragisa Stanujkic;Gabrijela Popovic;Darjan Karabasevic;Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene

  • Development of a Novel Integrated CCSD-ITARA-MARCOS Decision-Making Approach for Stackers Selection in a Logistics System

    Alptekin Ulutaş;Darjan Karabasevic;Gabrijela Popovic;Dragisa Stanujkic

  • A NEW HYBRID FUZZY PSI-PIPRECIA-COCOSO MCDM BASED APPROACH TO SOLVING THE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY SELECTION PROBLEM

    Alptekin Ulutaş;Gabrijela Popovic;Pavle Radanov;Dragisa Stanujkic

  • Assessment of Progress towards Achieving Sustainable Development Goals of the “Agenda 2030” by Using the CoCoSo and the Shannon Entropy Methods: The Case of the EU Countries

    Dragisa Stanujkic;Gabrijela Popovic;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Darjan Karabasevic

  • A New Hybrid MCDM Model for Personnel Selection Based on a Novel Grey PIPRECIA and Grey OCRA Methods

    Alptekin Ulutaş;Gabrijela Popovic;Dragisa Stanujkic;Darjan Karabasevic

  • The MCDM Model for Personnel Selection Based on SWARA and ARAS Methods

    Darjan Karabasevic;Dragisa Stanujkic;Snezana Urosevic

  • A Novel Integrated PIPRECIA–Interval-Valued Triangular Fuzzy ARAS Model: E-Learning Course Selection

    Kristina Jaukovic Jocic;Goran Jocic;Darjan Karabasevic;Gabrijela Popovic

  • A Bipolar Fuzzy Extension of the MULTIMOORA Method

    Dragisa Stanujkic;Darjan Karabasevic;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Florentin Smarandache

  • A multiple-criteria decision-making model for the selection of a hotel location

    Gabrijela Popovic;Dragisa Stanujkic;Miodrag Brzakovic;Darjan Karabasevic

  • New group decision-making ARCAS approach based on the integration of the SWARA and the ARAS methods adapted for negotiations

    Dragisa Stanujkic;Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas;Darjan Karabasevic;Zenonas Turskis

  • Assessment of progress towards “Europe 2020” strategy targets by using the MULTIMOORA method and the Shannon Entropy Index

    Aleksandra Fedajev;Dragisa Stanujkic;Darjan Karabašević;Willem K.M. Brauers

Frequent Co-Authors

Dragisa Stanujkic
Dragisa Stanujkic University of Belgrade
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Florentin Smarandache
Florentin Smarandache University of New Mexico
Zenonas Turskis
Zenonas Turskis Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Predrag S. Stanimirović
Predrag S. Stanimirović University of Nis
Željko Stević
Željko Stević University of East Sarajevo
Arunodaya Raj Mishra
Arunodaya Raj Mishra ITM University
Dragan Pamučar
Dragan Pamučar University of Belgrade

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Darjan Karabasevic

Recently Published Articles