World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
39
Citations
4993
World Ranking
1779
National Ranking
6

Fatih Ecer publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fatih Ecer sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 102 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Fatih Ecer D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fatih Ecer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Sustainable supplier selection: A novel integrated fuzzy best worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy CoCoSo with Bonferroni (CoCoSo’B) multi-criteria model

    Fatih Ecer;Dragan Pamucar

  • A novel LOPCOW-DOBI multi-criteria sustainability performance assessment methodology: An application in developing country banking sector

    Unknown

  • A consolidated MCDM framework for performance assessment of battery electric vehicles based on ranking strategies

    Fatih Ecer

  • Assessment of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainable road transportation of United States using integrated fuzzy FUCOM and neutrosophic fuzzy MARCOS methodology

    Dragan Pamucar;Fatih Ecer;Muhammet Deveci

  • Third-party logistics (3Pls) provider selection via Fuzzy AHP and EDAS integrated model

    Fatih Ecer

  • Multi-criteria decision making for green supplier selection using interval type-2 fuzzy AHP: a case study of a home appliance manufacturer

    Fatih Ecer

  • MARCOS technique under intuitionistic fuzzy environment for determining the COVID-19 pandemic performance of insurance companies in terms of healthcare services

    Fatih Ecer;Dragan Pamucar

  • An integrated BWM-LBWA-CoCoSo framework for evaluation of healthcare sectors in Eastern Europe

    Ali Ebadi Torkayesh;Dragan Pamucar;Fatih Ecer;Prasenjit Chatterjee

  • Application of Improved Best Worst Method (BWM) in Real-World Problems

    Dragan Pamučar;Fatih Ecer;Goran Cirovic;Melfi A. Arlasheedi

  • Comparative assessment of social sustainability performance: Integrated data-driven weighting system and CoCoSo model

    Ali Ebadi Torkayesh;Fatih Ecer;Dragan Pamucar;Çağlar Karamaşa

  • PRIORITIZING THE WEIGHTS OF THE EVALUATION CRITERIA UNDER FUZZINESS: THE FUZZY FULL CONSISTENCY METHOD – FUCOM-F

    Dragan Pamucar;Fatih Ecer

  • A hybrid banking websites quality evaluation model using AHP and COPRAS-G: a Turkey case

    Fatih Ecer

  • An extended MAIRCA method using intuitionistic fuzzy sets for coronavirus vaccine selection in the age of COVID-19

    Unknown

  • Assessment of renewable energy resources using new interval rough number extension of the level based weight assessment and combinative distance-based assessment

    Fatih Ecer;Dragan Pamucar;Abbas Mardani;Melfi Alrasheedi

  • Borsa İstanbul’da İşlem Gören Turizm Şirketlerinin Finansal Performanslarının Gri İlişkisel Analiz Yöntemiyle Ölçülmesi

    Fatih Ecer;Fatih Günay

  • Sustainability performance analysis of micro-mobility solutions in urban transportation with a novel IVFNN-Delphi-LOPCOW-CoCoSo framework

    Unknown

  • Selection of IoT service provider for sustainable transport using q-rung orthopair fuzzy CRADIS and unknown weights

    Unknown

  • Sustainability assessment of OPEC countries: Application of a multiple attribute decision making tool

    Fatih Ecer;Dragan Pamucar;Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani;Mahsa Keshavarz Eshkalag

  • An integrated Fuzzy AHP and ARAS model to evaluate mobile banking services

    Fatih Ecer

  • Sustainability assessment of existing onshore wind plants in the context of triple bottom line: a best-worst method (BWM) based MCDM framework

    Fatih Ecer

Frequent Co-Authors

Dragan Pamučar
Dragan Pamučar University of Belgrade
Abbas Mardani
Abbas Mardani Qazvin University of Medical Sciences
Zenonas Turskis
Zenonas Turskis Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Prasenjit Chatterjee
Prasenjit Chatterjee Maulana Abul Kalam Azad University of Technology
Muhammet Deveci
Muhammet Deveci University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Fatih Ecer