World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Engineering and Technology
Turkey
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
99
Citations
36967
World Ranking
155
National Ranking
2

Cengiz Kahraman publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cengiz Kahraman sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 619 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Cengiz Kahraman D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cengiz Kahraman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 99 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Turkey Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Turkey Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Engineering and Technology in Turkey Leader Award

Overview

Cengiz Kahraman is a researcher affiliated with Istanbul Technical University in Turkey. Their work primarily focuses on Decision Sciences, Engineering, and Computer Science. Within these fields, their subfields of study include Management Science and Operations Research, Control and Systems Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

Their research extensively covers several main topics:

  • Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Optimization and Mathematical Programming
  • Fuzzy Systems and Optimization
  • Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic
  • Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems
  • Quality Function Deployment in Product Design
  • Sustainable Supply Chain Management

Frequent co-authors working with Kahraman include Başar Öztayşi, Sezi Çevik Onar, Selçuk Çebi, Elif Haktanır, and Nurşah Alkan.

Their scholarly output is published often in journals such as:

  • Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems
  • Applied Soft Computing
  • Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
  • Informatica
  • Notes on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Kahraman are:

  • Group decision-making based on complex spherical fuzzy VIKOR approach, 2021, Knowledge-Based Systems
  • Risk assessment of renewable energy investments: A modified failure mode and effect analysis based on prospect theory and intuitionistic fuzzy AHP, 2021, Energy
  • Evaluation of government strategies against COVID-19 pandemic using q-rung orthopair fuzzy TOPSIS method, 2021, Applied Soft Computing
  • Extension of TOPSIS model to the decision-making under complex spherical fuzzy information, 2021, Soft Computing
  • Customer-oriented product design using an integrated neutrosophic AHP & DEMATEL & QFD methodology, 2022, Applied Soft Computing

Kahraman has published several books under prominent publishers. Among the titles are:

  • Intelligent and Fuzzy Techniques for Emerging Conditions and Digital Transformation, 2021, Springer International Publishing
  • Customer Oriented Product Design, 2020, Springer International Publishing
  • Intelligent Systems in Digital Transformation, 2022, Springer International Publishing
  • Toward Humanoid Robots: The Role of Fuzzy Sets, 2021, Springer International Publishing
  • Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 2023, Springer International Publishing
  • Decision Making with Spherical Fuzzy Sets, 2020, Springer Nature
  • Analytic Hierarchy Process with Fuzzy Sets Extensions, 2023, Springer Nature

Best Publications

  • Multi‐criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP

    Cengiz Kahraman;Ufuk Cebeci;Ziya Ulukan

  • Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey

    Cengiz Kahraman;Ufuk Cebeci;Da Ruan

  • A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach

    Cengiz Kahraman;Tij en Ertay;Gülcin Büyüközkan

  • Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: The case of Istanbul

    Tolga Kaya;Cengiz Kahraman

  • Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection

    Cengiz Kahraman;Da Ruan;Ibrahim Doǧan

  • Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making: Theory and Applications with Recent Developments

    Cengiz Kahraman

  • Prioritization of human capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP

    F. Tunç Bozbura;Ahmet Beskese;Cengiz Kahraman

  • A comparative analysis for multiattribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process

    Cengiz Kahraman;İhsan Kaya;Selcuk Cebi

  • Fuzzy multi-attribute selection among transportation companies using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy process

    Osman Kulak;Cengiz Kahraman

  • Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making: A Literature Review

    Cengiz Kahraman;Sezi Cevik Onar;Basar Oztaysi

  • Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology

    Tolga Kaya;Cengiz Kahraman

  • A novel approach to risk assessment for occupational health and safety using Pythagorean fuzzy AHP & fuzzy inference system

    Esra Ilbahar;Esra Ilbahar;Ali Karaşan;Ali Karaşan;Selcuk Cebi;Cengiz Kahraman

  • Fuzzy performance evaluation in Turkish Banking Sector using Analytic Hierarchy Process and TOPSIS

    Neşe Yalçın Seçme;Ali Bayrakdaroğlu;Cengiz Kahraman

  • Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with interval type-2 fuzzy sets

    Cengiz Kahraman;Başar Öztayşi;İrem Uçal Sarı;Ebru Turanoğlu

  • A novel spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its renewable energy application

    Fatma Kutlu Gündoğdu;Fatma Kutlu Gündoğdu;Cengiz Kahraman

  • Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems

    Cafer Erhan Bozdağ;Cengiz Kahraman;Da Ruan

  • A fuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives

    Cengiz Kahraman;İhsan Kaya

  • A decision support system for demand forecasting with artificial neural networks and neuro-fuzzy models: A comparative analysis

    Tuğba Efendigil;Semih Önüt;Cengiz Kahraman

  • A FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION APPROACH FOR SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY SELECTION

    Gülçin Büyüközkan;Cengiz Kahraman;Da Ruan

  • Application of fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methods for financial performance evaluation of Turkish manufacturing industries

    Nese Yalcin;Ali Bayrakdaroglu;Cengiz Kahraman

  • Fuzzy multicriteria disposal method and site selection for municipal solid waste

    Mehmet Ekmekçioğlu;Tolga Kaya;Cengiz Kahraman

Frequent Co-Authors

Basar Oztaysi
Basar Oztaysi Istanbul Technical University
İhsan Kaya
İhsan Kaya Yıldız Technical University
Da Ruan
Da Ruan Ghent University
Gülçin Büyüközkan
Gülçin Büyüközkan Galatasaray University
Luis Martínez
Luis Martínez University of Jaén
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas
Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Nelson Oly Ndubisi
Nelson Oly Ndubisi Southern Cross University
Zahir Irani
Zahir Irani University of Bradford
Rosa M. Rodríguez
Rosa M. Rodríguez University of Jaén
Benjamin Bedregal
Benjamin Bedregal Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Cengiz Kahraman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles