World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
56
Citations
13912
World Ranking
4036
National Ranking
44

Da Ruan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Da Ruan sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 318 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Da Ruan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Da Ruan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Da Ruan was affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium and contributed mainly to the fields of Computer Science and Engineering. Their work spanned key subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Mechanical Engineering, Management Science and Operations Research, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Biomedical Engineering.

The primary research topics covered in Da Ruan's publications included Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Cognitive Science and Mapping, Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference, Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge, Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic, Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation, and Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions.

Da Ruan's notable publications were:

  • Multi-criteria Group Decision Support with Linguistic Variables in Long-term Scenarios for Belgian Energy Policy (2020, Ghent University Academic Bibliography)
  • Some Views on Information Fusion and Logic Based Approaches in Decision Making under Uncertainty (2020, Ghent University Academic Bibliography)
  • Continuous-Flow Ammoxidation of 2-Methylpyrazine to 2-Cyanopyrazine with High Space-Time Yield in a Microreactor (2022, ACS Omega)
  • Energy, exergy, economic, and environmental compromising performance of dual-stage evaporation-ammonia hybrid compression-absorption refrigeration system for the cooling supply of keto-benzene dewaxing process (2024, Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering)

The scientist collaborated frequently with several coauthors throughout their career. Frequent collaborators included Jie Lü, Erik Laes, Guangquan Zhang, Jun Ma, and Gaston Meskens.

The venues where Da Ruan's research was published most often included Ghent University Academic Bibliography, ACS Omega, and Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering.

Best Publications

  • Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey

    Cengiz Kahraman;Ufuk Cebeci;Da Ruan

  • Fuzzy group decision-making for facility location selection

    Cengiz Kahraman;Da Ruan;Ibrahim Doǧan

  • Multi-objective Group Decision Making: Methods, Software and Applications With Fuzzy Set Techniques

    Jie Lu;Guangquan Zhang;Da Ruan

  • Lattice-Valued Logic

    Yang Xu;Keyun Qin;Da Ruan;Jun Liu

  • Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems

    Cafer Erhan Bozdağ;Cengiz Kahraman;Da Ruan

  • Integrating data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy for the facility layout design in manufacturing systems

    Tijen Ertay;Da Ruan;Umut Rıfat Tuzkaya

  • A FUZZY MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION APPROACH FOR SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY SELECTION

    Gülçin Büyüközkan;Cengiz Kahraman;Da Ruan

  • Computing with Words in Decision support Systems: An overview on Models and Applications

    Luis Martínez;Da Ruan;Francisco Herrera

  • A rough sets based characteristic relation approach for dynamic attribute generalization in data mining

    Tianrui Li;Da Ruan;Wets Geert;Jing Song

  • Capital budgeting techniques using discounted fuzzy versus probabilistic cash flows

    Cengiz Kahraman;Da Ruan;Ethem Tolga

  • A fuzzy preference-ranking model for a quality evaluation of hospital Web sites

    R. Ufuk Bilsel;Gülçin Büyüközkan;Da Ruan

  • Multi-Objective Group Decision Making: Methods, Software and Applications with Fuzzy Set Techniques(With CD-ROM)

    Jie Lu;Guangquan Zhang;Da Ruan;Fengjie Wu

  • Evaluation of software development projects using a fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach

    Gülçin Büyüközkan;Da Ruan

  • Determining the importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the fuzzy analytic network approach

    Gülçin Büyüközkan;Tijen Ertay;Cengiz Kahraman;Da Ruan

  • Probabilistic model criteria with decision-theoretic rough sets

    Dun Liu;Tianrui Li;Da Ruan

  • Determining the importance weights for the design requirements in the house of quality using the fuzzy analytic network approach: The Fuzzy Analytic Network Approach

    Gülçin Büyüközkan;Tijen Ertay;Cengiz Kahraman;Da Ruan

  • Data envelopment analysis based decision model for optimal operator allocation in CMS

    Tijen Ertay;Da Ruan

  • a-resolution principle based on lattice-valued propositional logic LP( X )

    Yang Xu;Da Ruan;Etienne E. Kerre;Jun Liu

  • A Rough-Set-Based Incremental Approach for Updating Approximations under Dynamic Maintenance Environments

    Hongmei Chen;Tianrui Li;Da Ruan;Jianhui Lin

  • Rough sets based matrix approaches with dynamic attribute variation in set-valued information systems

    Junbo Zhang;Tianrui Li;Da Ruan;Dun Liu

  • Improved hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS for road safety performance evaluation

    Qiong Bao;Da Ruan;Yongjun Shen;Elke Hermans

  • Fuzzy implication operators and generalized fuzzy method of cases

    D. Ruan;E. E. Kerre

  • Dealing with heterogeneous information in engineering evaluation processes

    Luis Martínez;Jun Liu;Da Ruan;Jian-Bo Yang

Frequent Co-Authors

Guangquan Zhang
Guangquan Zhang University of Technology Sydney
Jie Lu
Jie Lu University of Technology Sydney
Gülçin Büyüközkan
Gülçin Büyüközkan Galatasaray University
Cengiz Kahraman
Cengiz Kahraman Istanbul Technical University
Luis Martínez
Luis Martínez University of Jaén
Etienne Kerre
Etienne Kerre Ghent University
Tianrui Li
Tianrui Li Southwest Jiaotong University
Koen Vanhoof
Koen Vanhoof Hasselt University
Tom Brijs
Tom Brijs Hasselt University
Geert Wets
Geert Wets Hasselt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related online degrees and career options. Upskilling with certificates and advanced degrees online is more accessible than ever, allowing you to tailor your learning to meet current industry needs.

If you’re interested in engineering, consider the online electrical engineering degree ranking to find top programs offering flexible study options. For those seeking a faster route into tech careers, there are also 3-month certificate programs that pay well—ideal for building practical skills and boosting employability quickly.

If your goal is to achieve graduate credentials without a lengthy time commitment, check out the quickest cheapest masters degree options available online. For those who want to invest in long-term career growth, explore the most useful masters degrees that are in high demand by employers.

Whether you choose a certificate or advanced degree, online study offers flexibility, affordability, and the chance to tailor your pathway toward specialized or interdisciplinary careers in tech.

Best Scientists Citing Da Ruan

Recently Published Articles