World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
6287
World Ranking
7238
National Ranking
3117

David A. Bereiter publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Bereiter sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 137 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

David A. Bereiter D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David A. Bereiter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

David A. Bereiter is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine, Neuroscience, and Health Professions, with significant contributions in subfields including Physiology, Complementary and Manual Therapy, Sensory Systems, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems.

Their research topics cover various aspects of pain mechanisms and treatments, temporomandibular joint disorders, olfactory and sensory function studies, ocular surface and contact lens, botulinum toxin and related neurological disorders, glaucoma and retinal disorders, and advancements in transdermal drug delivery.

Recent notable papers authored or coauthored by Bereiter include:

  • P2x7 Receptor Activation and Estrogen Status Drive Neuroinflammatory Mechanisms in a Rat Model for Dry Eye (2022), Frontiers in Pharmacology
  • The effects of estrogen on temporomandibular joint pain as influenced by trigeminal caudalis neurons (2020), Journal of Oral Science
  • Temporomandibular disorders cases with high-impact pain are more likely to experience short-term pain fluctuations (2022), Scientific Reports
  • Enhanced Ocular Surface and Intraoral Nociception via a Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1 Mechanism in a Rat Model of Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2021), Neuroscience
  • Diquafosol sodium reduces neuronal activity in trigeminal subnucleus caudalis in a rat model of chronic dry eye disease (2022), Neuroscience Letters

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Bereiter include:

  • Ayano Katagiri
  • Takafumi Kato
  • Connor M. Peck
  • Christophe Lenglet
  • Lynn E. Eberly

The venues where Bereiter has been frequently published comprise Frontiers in Pharmacology, Scientific Reports, Neuroscience Letters, Journal of Oral Science, and Neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • TFOS DEWS II pain and sensation report

    Carlos Belmonte;Jason J. Nichols;Stephanie M. Cox;James A. Brock

  • Cephalic phase, reflex insulin secretion neuroanatomical and physiological characterization.

    H. R. Berthoud;D. A. Bereiter;E. R. Trimble;E. G. Siegel

  • Trigeminal subnucleus caudalis: beyond homologies with the spinal dorsal horn.

    David A Bereiter;Harumitsu Hirata;James W Hu

  • Cephalic-phase insulin secretion in normal and pancreatic islet-transplanted rats.

    H. R. Berthoud;E. R. Trimble;E. G. Siegel;D. A. Bereiter

  • Altered neuroanatomical organization in the central nervous system of the genetically obese (ob/ob) mouse

    David A Bereiter;B. Jeanrenaud

  • Encoding of Corneal Input in Two Distinct Regions of the Spinal Trigeminal Nucleus in the Rat: Cutaneous Receptive Field Properties, Responses to Thermal and Chemical Stimulation, Modulation by Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls, and Projections to the Parabrachial Area

    I. D. Meng;J. W. Hu;A. P. Benetti;D. A. Bereiter

  • Distribution of fos‐like immunoreactivity in the caudal brainstem of the rat following noxious chemical stimulation of the temporomandibular joint

    Charles B. Hathaway;James W. Hu;David A. Bereiter

  • Bright light activates a trigeminal nociceptive pathway.

    Keiichiro Okamoto;Akimasa Tashiro;Zheng Chang;David A. Bereiter

  • Suppression of noxious stimulus-evoked expression of Fos protein-like immunoreactivity in rat spinal cord by a selective cannabinoid agonist.

    K. Tsou;K. A. Lowitz;A. G. Hohmann;W. J. Martin

  • Oestrogen receptor-immunoreactive neurons in the trigeminal sensory system of male and cycling female rats

    D.A. Bereiter;J.L. Cioffi;D.F. Bereiter

  • Bright light produces Fos-positive neurons in caudal trigeminal brainstem

    Keiichiro Okamoto;R. Thompson;A. Tashiro;Z. Chang

  • Differential distribution of Fos-like immunoreactivity in the spinal trigeminal nucleus after noxious and innocuous thermal and chemical stimulation of rat cornea.

    I.D. Meng;D.A. Bereiter

  • Cornea-responsive medullary dorsal horn neurons: modulation by local opioids and projections to thalamus and brain stem.

    Harumitsu Hirata;Shinichiro Takeshita;James W. Hu;David A. Bereiter

  • The TFOS International Workshop on Contact Lens Discomfort: Report of the Subcommittee on NeurobiologyReport of the Subcommittee on Neurobiology

    Fiona Stapleton;Carl Marfurt;Blanka Golebiowski;Mark Rosenblatt

  • A novel class of neurons at the trigeminal subnucleus interpolaris/caudalis transition region monitors ocular surface fluid status and modulates tear production.

    Harumitsu Hirata;Keiichiro Okamoto;Akimasa Tashiro;David A. Bereiter

  • Adrenalectomy enhances Fos-like immunoreactivity within the spinal trigeminal nucleus induced by noxious thermal stimulation of the cornea

    J. Lu;C.B. Hathaway;D.A. Bereiter

  • Excitatory amino release within spinal trigeminal nucleus after mustard oil injection into the temporomandibular joint region of the rat.

    David A. Bereiter;Albert P. Benetti

  • Influence of sex on reflex jaw muscle activity evoked from the rat temporomandibular joint

    Brian E Cairns;Yiin Sim;David A Bereiter;Barry J Sessle

  • Sex differences in brainstem neural activation after injury to the TMJ region.

    David A. Bereiter

  • Response properties of TMJ units in superficial laminae at the spinomedullary junction of female rats vary over the estrous cycle.

    Keiichiro Okamoto;H. Hirata;S. Takeshita;David A. Bereiter

  • Responses of Medullary Dorsal Horn Neurons to Corneal Stimulation by CO2 Pulses in the Rat

    Harumitsu Hirata;James W. Hu;David A. Bereiter

Frequent Co-Authors

James W. Hu
James W. Hu University of Toronto
Bernard Jeanrenaud
Bernard Jeanrenaud University of Geneva
Donald A. Simone
Donald A. Simone University of Minnesota
Koichi Iwata
Koichi Iwata Nihon University
Carlos Belmonte
Carlos Belmonte Miguel Hernandez University
Brian E. Cairns
Brian E. Cairns University of British Columbia
Barry J. Sessle
Barry J. Sessle University of Toronto
Ujendra Kumar
Ujendra Kumar University of British Columbia
Mark D. P. Willcox
Mark D. P. Willcox University of New South Wales
William J. Martin
William J. Martin National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing David A. Bereiter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles