World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
54
Citations
9067
World Ranking
4970
National Ranking
287

James W. Hu publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. Hu sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 112 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

James W. Hu D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. Hu sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

James W. Hu is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their research spans the fields of Medicine and Engineering, with a particular focus on Surgery, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Biomedical Engineering. Their subfields also include Molecular Biology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The primary topics in their work involve Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology, Spinal Fractures and Fixation Techniques, Medical Imaging and Analysis, Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research, vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches, Protein purification and stability, and Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair.

James W. Hu has published articles in several journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • World Neurosurgery
  • mAbs
  • Journal of Medical Systems
  • Neurosurgery
  • Neurosurgical Review

Their recent papers include:

  • Systematic Review of Surgical Success, Complications, Revision Rates, Radiation Dosage, and Operative Time of 3D-Navigated versus Non-Navigated Spinal Procedures, 2024, World Neurosurgery
  • An adapted consensus protein design strategy for identifying globally optimal biotherapeutics, 2022, mAbs
  • External Ventricular Drain Placement Teleproctoring Using a Novel Camera-Projector Navigation System: A Proof-of-Concept Study, 2023, World Neurosurgery
  • Case Volume Justification of 3D-Navigated Spinal Procedures: A Cost-Benefit Analysis, 2023, Journal of Medical Systems
  • 472 Complications of 3D-Navigated Spinal Procedures: A Systematic Review, 2024, Neurosurgery

James W. Hu's frequent coauthors include:

  • Ikaasa Suri
  • Kurt Yaeger
  • S. Suthakaran
  • Daniel Kwon
  • Matthew T. Carr

Their work is notable for integrating advanced surgical techniques with medical imaging and teleproctoring technology. The research contributions cover surgical outcomes, complication rates, operative time, and cost-benefit analyses for spinal procedures using 3D navigation systems. Additionally, exploratory work in protein design and biotherapeutics is part of their portfolio.

Best Publications

  • Peripheral suppression of first pain and central summation of second pain evoked by noxious heat pulses

    Donald D. Price;James W. Hu;Ronald Dubner;Richard H. Gracely

  • Convergence of cutaneous, tooth pulp, visceral, neck and muscle afferents onto nociceptive and non-nociceptive neurones in trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (medullary dorsal horn) and its implications for referred pain.

    B J Sessle;J W Hu;N Amano;G Zhong

  • Functional properties of neurons in cat trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (medullary dorsal horn). I. Responses to oral-facial noxious and nonnoxious stimuli and projections to thalamus and subnucleus oralis.

    J W Hu;J O Dostrovsky;B J Sessle

  • Stimulation of craniofacial muscle afferents induces prolonged facilitatory effects in trigeminal nociceptive brain-stem neurones

    J. W. Hu;B. J. Sessle;P. Raboisson;R. Dallel

  • Sex-related differences in human pain and rat afferent discharge evoked by injection of glutamate into the masseter muscle.

    Brian E. Cairns;James W. Hu;Lars Arendt-Nielsen;Barry J. Sessle

  • Response properties of nociceptive and non-nociceptive neurons in the rat's trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (medullary dorsal horn) related to cutaneous and deep craniofacial afferent stimulation and modulation by diffuse noxious inhibitory controls.

    James W. Hu

  • Glutamate-evoked pain and mechanical allodynia in the human masseter muscle.

    Peter Svensson;Peter Svensson;Peter Svensson;Brian E Cairns;Kelun Wang;James W Hu

  • Trigeminal subnucleus caudalis: beyond homologies with the spinal dorsal horn.

    David A Bereiter;Harumitsu Hirata;James W Hu

  • Effects of inflammatory irritant application to the rat temporomandibular joint on jaw and neck muscle activity

    X.-M. Yu;B. J. Sessle;H. Vernon;J. W. Hu

  • Evidence That Excitatory Amino Acid Receptors within the Temporomandibular Joint Region Are Involved in the Reflex Activation of the Jaw Muscles

    Brian E. Cairns;Barry J. Sessle;James W. Hu

  • Responses of neurons in feline trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (medullary dorsal horn) to cutaneous, intraoral, and muscle afferent stimuli.

    N. Amano;J. W. Hu;B. J. Sessle

  • Encoding of Corneal Input in Two Distinct Regions of the Spinal Trigeminal Nucleus in the Rat: Cutaneous Receptive Field Properties, Responses to Thermal and Chemical Stimulation, Modulation by Diffuse Noxious Inhibitory Controls, and Projections to the Parabrachial Area

    I. D. Meng;J. W. Hu;A. P. Benetti;D. A. Bereiter

  • Distribution of fos‐like immunoreactivity in the caudal brainstem of the rat following noxious chemical stimulation of the temporomandibular joint

    Charles B. Hathaway;James W. Hu;David A. Bereiter

  • Raphe-induced suppression of the jaw-opening reflex and single neurons in trigeminal subnucleus oralis, and influence of naloxone and subnucleus caudalis

    Barry J. Sessle;James W. Hu

  • Effects of substance P on nociceptive and non-nociceptive trigeminal brain stem neurons

    James L. Henry;James L. Henry;Barry J. Sessle;Barry J. Sessle;Gregory E. Lucier;Gregory E. Lucier;James W. Hu;James W. Hu

  • Involvement of glia in central sensitization in trigeminal subnucleus caudalis (medullary dorsal horn).

    Y.F. Xie;S. Zhang;C.Y. Chiang;J.W. Hu

  • Mechanisms of pain arising from articular tissues.

    Barry J. Sessle;James W. Hu

  • Astroglial Glutamate–Glutamine Shuttle Is Involved in Central Sensitization of Nociceptive Neurons in Rat Medullary Dorsal Horn

    Chen-Yu Chiang;Jing Wang;Yu-Feng Xie;Sun Zhang

  • SEX-RELATED DIFFERENCES IN NMDA-EVOKED RAT MASSETER MUSCLE AFFERENT DISCHARGE RESULT FROM ESTROGEN-MEDIATED MODULATION OF PERIPHERAL NMDA RECEPTOR ACTIVITY

    Xu-Dong Dong;Mandeep K. Mann;Ujendra Kumar;Peter Svensson

  • NMDA Receptor Mechanisms Contribute to Neuroplasticity Induced in Caudalis Nociceptive Neurons by Tooth Pulp Stimulation

    Chen Yu Chiang;Soo Joung Park;Chun L. Kwan;James W. Hu

Frequent Co-Authors

Barry J. Sessle
Barry J. Sessle University of Toronto
Jonathan O. Dostrovsky
Jonathan O. Dostrovsky University of Toronto
Brian E. Cairns
Brian E. Cairns University of British Columbia
David A. Bereiter
David A. Bereiter University of Minnesota
Koichi Iwata
Koichi Iwata Nihon University
Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Lars Arendt-Nielsen Aalborg University
Kelun Wang
Kelun Wang Aalborg University
Ujendra Kumar
Ujendra Kumar University of British Columbia
Peter Svensson
Peter Svensson Aarhus University
Messoud Ashina
Messoud Ashina University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing James W. Hu

Recently Published Articles