World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
44
Citations
7822
World Ranking
7151
National Ranking
3096

Mitchell F. Roitman publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchell F. Roitman sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 83 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mitchell F. Roitman D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mitchell F. Roitman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mitchell F. Roitman is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Chicago in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Neuroscience, with a significant emphasis on subfields such as Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Nutrition and Dietetics, and Cell Biology.

The scientist's main topics of work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior, Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques, Regulation of Appetite and Obesity, Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications, Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling, Neural dynamics and brain function, and Sleep and Wakefulness Research.

Mitchell F. Roitman has contributed to multiple publication venues, frequently appearing in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • UNC Libraries
  • eLife
  • Physiology & Behavior
  • Scientific Reports

Recent published papers include:

  • "Thirst recruits phasic dopamine signaling through subfornical organ neurons," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "An open-source platform for head-fixed operant and consummatory behavior," 2023, eLife
  • "Descending Dopaminergic Inputs to Reticulospinal Neurons Promote Locomotor Movements," 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Central oxytocin signaling inhibits food reward-motivated behaviors and VTA dopamine responses to food-predictive cues in male rats," 2020, Hormones and Behavior
  • "Amylin Modulates a Ventral Tegmental Area-to-Medial Prefrontal Cortex Circuit to Suppress Food Intake and Impulsive Food-Directed Behavior," 2023, Biological Psychiatry

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Ted M. Hsu
  • Paula Bazzino
  • Jamie D. Roitman
  • Pushkar Bansal
  • Erica E. Jung

Best Publications

  • Dopamine Operates as a Subsecond Modulator of Food Seeking

    Mitchell F. Roitman;Garret D. Stuber;Paul E. M. Phillips;R. Mark Wightman

  • Associative learning mediates dynamic shifts in dopamine signaling in the nucleus accumbens

    Jeremy J Day;Mitchell F Roitman;R Mark Wightman;Regina M Carelli

  • Nucleus accumbens neurons are innately tuned for rewarding and aversive taste stimuli, encode their predictors, and are linked to motor output.

    Mitchell F. Roitman;Robert A. Wheeler;Regina M. Carelli

  • Real-time chemical responses in the nucleus accumbens differentiate rewarding and aversive stimuli

    Mitchell F Roitman;Robert A Wheeler;R Mark Wightman;Regina M Carelli

  • Inhibition of PTP1B by trodusquemine (MSI-1436) causes fat-specific weight loss in diet-induced obese mice.

    Kristen A. Lantz;Susan G. Emeigh Hart;Sonia L. Planey;Mitchell F. Roitman

  • Rapid dopamine signaling in the nucleus accumbens during contingent and noncontingent cocaine administration.

    Garret D Stuber;Mitchell F Roitman;Paul E M Phillips;Regina M Carelli

  • Primary food reward and reward-predictive stimuli evoke different patterns of phasic dopamine signaling throughout the striatum

    Holden D. Brown;James E. McCutcheon;Jackson J. Cone;Michael E. Ragozzino

  • Ghrelin Acts as an Interface between Physiological State and Phasic Dopamine Signaling

    Jackson J. Cone;James E. McCutcheon;Mitchell F. Roitman

  • New Insights into the Specificity and Plasticity of Reward and Aversion Encoding in the Mesolimbic System

    Susan F. Volman;Stephan Lammel;Elyssa B. Margolis;Yunbok Kim

  • Amphetamine paradoxically augments exocytotic dopamine release and phasic dopamine signals.

    DP Daberkow;HD Brown;KD Bunner;SA Kraniotis

  • Depressive-like effects of the kappa opioid receptor agonist salvinorin A are associated with decreased phasic dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens

    Stephanie R. Ebner;Mitchell F. Roitman;David N. Potter;Anna B. Rachlin

  • Nucleus accumbens neurons encode Pavlovian approach behaviors: Evidence from an autoshaping paradigm

    Jeremy J. Day;Robert A. Wheeler;Mitchell F. Roitman;Regina M. Carelli

  • Endocannabinoids shape accumbal encoding of cue-motivated behavior via CB1 receptor activation in the ventral tegmentum

    Erik B. Oleson;Michael V. Beckert;Joshua T. Morra;Carien S. Lansink

  • Encoding of aversion by dopamine and the nucleus accumbens.

    James Edgar Mccutcheon;Stephanie Rose Ebner;Amy Laura Loriaux;Mitchell Franklin Roitman

  • Sources Contributing to the Average Extracellular Concentration of Dopamine in the Nucleus Accumbens

    Catarina A. Owesson-White;Mitchell F. Roitman;Leslie A. Sombers;Anna M. Belle

  • Induction of a salt appetite alters dendritic morphology in nucleus accumbens and sensitizes rats to amphetamine.

    Mitchell F. Roitman;Elisa Na;Gregory Anderson;Theresa A. Jones

  • Regional specificity in the real-time development of phasic dopamine transmission patterns during acquisition of a cue-cocaine association in rats.

    Brandon J. Aragona;Jeremy J. Day;Mitchell F. Roitman;Nathan A. Cleaveland

  • Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor activation in the nucleus accumbens core suppresses feeding by increasing glutamatergic AMPA/kainate signaling.

    Elizabeth G. Mietlicki-Baase;Pavel I. Ortinski;Pavel I. Ortinski;David J. Reiner;Christopher G. Sinon

  • Prolonged High Fat Diet Reduces Dopamine Reuptake without Altering DAT Gene Expression

    Jackson J. Cone;Elena Halley Chartoff;David N. Potter;Stephanie R. Ebner

  • Amylin Modulates the Mesolimbic Dopamine System to Control Energy Balance

    Elizabeth G Mietlicki-Baase;David J Reiner;Jackson J Cone;Diana R Olivos

  • Sucrose-predictive cues evoke greater phasic dopamine release than saccharin-predictive cues.

    James E. McCutcheon;Jeff A. Beeler;Mitchell F. Roitman

Frequent Co-Authors

Regina M. Carelli
Regina M. Carelli University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Ilene L. Bernstein
Ilene L. Bernstein University of Washington
R. Mark Wightman
R. Mark Wightman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Réjean Dubuc
Réjean Dubuc University of Quebec at Montreal
Todd E. Thiele
Todd E. Thiele University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Garret D. Stuber
Garret D. Stuber University of Washington
Michael E. Ragozzino
Michael E. Ragozzino University of Illinois at Chicago
Harvey J. Grill
Harvey J. Grill University of Pennsylvania
Matthew R. Hayes
Matthew R. Hayes University of Pennsylvania
Scott E. Kanoski
Scott E. Kanoski University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mitchell F. Roitman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles