World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jonathan A. Stamford

Jonathan A. Stamford

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
45
Citations
6285
World Ranking
6995
National Ranking
545

Jonathan A. Stamford publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan A. Stamford sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 126 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jonathan A. Stamford D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan A. Stamford sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan A. Stamford is affiliated with the Royal London Hospital in the United Kingdom. Their professional profile reflects an active engagement in medical research within this institution.

No recent papers have been documented in the available data, which limits detailed insight into the most current research contributions made by Jonathan A. Stamford.

There are no listed frequent co-authors or publication venues, indicating either a more independent research approach or limited data on collaborative and publication patterns.

Similarly, there is no specific information about book publications or main and subfields of study directly associated with them.

The absence of named main topics of work and awards suggests that publicly available bibliometric or accolade records are either minimal or not recorded within the provided data.

Despite limited details, Jonathan A. Stamford's association with a prominent healthcare institution suggests a focus on clinical or applied medical research, although precise areas of specialization could not be examined here.

Best Publications

  • Electrochemical, pharmacological and electrophysiological evidence of rapid dopamine release and removal in the rat caudate nucleus following electrical stimulation of the median forebrain bundle.

    Julian Millar;Jonathan A. Stamford;Zygmunt L. Kruk;R.Mark Wightman

  • Descending control of pain.

    J A Stamford

  • EVIDENCE THAT 5-HYDROXYTRYPTAMINE RELEASE IN RAT DORSAL RAPHE NUCLEUS IS CONTROLLED BY 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B AND 5-HT1D AUTORECEPTORS

    Colin Davidson;Jonathan A. Stamford

  • Time window of autoreceptor-mediated inhibition of limbic and striatal dopamine release

    Paul E.M. Phillips;Pamela J. Hancock;Jonathan A. Stamford;Jonathan A. Stamford

  • Control of dorsal raphé 5-HT function by multiple 5-HT1 autoreceptors: parallel purposes or pointless plurality?

    Jonathan A. Stamford;Colin Davidson;Daniel P. McLaughlin;Sarah E. Hopwood

  • In vivo voltammetry—Present electrodes and methods

    C.A. Marsden;M.H. Joseph;Z.L. Kruk;N.T. Maidment

  • Regional differences in extracellular ascorbic acid levels in the rat brain determined by high speed cyclic voltammetry

    Jonathan A. Stamford;Zygmunt L. Kruk;Julian Millar

  • Development and ageing of the rat nigrostriatal dopamine system studied with fast cyclic voltammetry.

    Jonathan A. Stamford

  • ACTIONS OF THE HYPNOTIC ANAESTHETIC, DEXMEDETOMIDINE, ON NORADRENALINE RELEASE AND CELL FIRING IN RAT LOCUS COERULEUS SLICES

    C.M. Jorm;J.A. Stamford

  • Presynaptic regulation of dopamine release in corpus striatum monitored in vitro in real time by fast cyclic voltammetry.

    P. Palij;D.R. Bull;M.J. Sheehan;J. Millar

  • Striatal dopamine uptake in the rat: in vivo analysis by fast cyclic voltammetry

    Jonathan A. Stamford;Zygmunt L. Kruk;Julian Millar;R.Mark Wightman

  • Application of fast cyclic voltammetry to measurement of electrically evoked dopamine overflow from brain slices in vitro

    D.R. Bull;P. Palij;M.J. Sheehan;J. Millar

  • Diffusion and uptake of dopamine in rat caudate and nucleus accumbens compared using fast cyclic voltammetry

    Jonathan A. Stamford;Zygmunt L. Kruk;Peter Palij;Julian Millar

  • In vivo voltammetry: some methodological considerations.

    Jonathan A. Stamford

  • α2A- But not α2B/C-adrenoceptors modulate noradrenaline release in rat locus coeruleus: voltammetric data

    Luis F. Callado;Jonathan A. Stamford

  • Using a smartphone-based self-management platform to support medication adherence and clinical consultation in Parkinson's disease.

    Rashmi Lakshminarayana;Duolao Wang;David Burn;K Ray Chaudhuri

  • In vivo voltammetry: promise and perspective

    Jonathan A. Stamford

  • Presynaptic control of striatal dopamine neurotransmission in adult vesicular monoamine transporter 2 (VMAT2) mutant mice.

    Jyoti Patel;Katrin A. Mooslehner;Pok Man Chan;Piers C. Emson

  • Fast cyclic voltammetry: measuring transmitter release in 'real time'.

    Jonathan A. Stamford

  • Stimulated limbic and striatal dopamine release measured by fast cyclic voltammetry: anatomical, electrochemical and pharmacological characterisation.

    Jonathan A. Stamford;Zygmunt L. Kruk;Julian Millar

  • Striatal dopamine terminals release serotonin after 5-HTP pretreatment: in vivo voltammetric data.

    Jonathan A. Stamford;Zygmunt L. Kruk;Julian Millar

Frequent Co-Authors

Zygmunt L. Kruk
Zygmunt L. Kruk University of Portsmouth
Paul E. M. Phillips
Paul E. M. Phillips University of Washington
Paul Willner
Paul Willner Swansea University
R. Mark Wightman
R. Mark Wightman University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Isabelle Seif
Isabelle Seif University of Paris-Saclay
Michael J. O'Neill
Michael J. O'Neill Eli Lilly (United States)
John J. O'Connor
John J. O'Connor University College Dublin
Mariusz Papp
Mariusz Papp Polish Academy of Sciences
Piers C. Emson
Piers C. Emson Babraham Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Whether you’re pursuing a future in neuroscience or exploring related fields, it’s helpful to consider broader degree and career options. Many students want to know about the highest paying college majors to maximize their earning potential post-graduation. Neuroscience can lead to lucrative roles in research, healthcare, and technology, but related majors in STEM and data science are also financially rewarding.

For those seeking flexible study options, online colleges make it easier to balance education with life commitments and may offer lower tuition rates. Many students also look for alternative credentials through certificates I can get online, which can rapidly boost skills in specialized areas like neuroinformatics, psychology, or biomedical analysis.

If you’re concerned about the workload, you can explore the easiest online college pathways, some of which may overlap with neuroscience or its allied fields. Overall, online pathways offer flexibility, affordability, and new professional opportunities for anyone interested in the ever-evolving world of neuroscience.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan A. Stamford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles