World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Neuroscience
Poland
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
56
Citations
11339
World Ranking
4521
National Ranking
4

Mariusz Papp publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mariusz Papp sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 252 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Mariusz Papp D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mariusz Papp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in Poland Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Neuroscience in Poland Leader Award

Overview

Mariusz Papp is affiliated with the Polish Academy of Sciences in Poland and has contributed extensively to the field of Neuroscience with a particular focus on behavioral and molecular aspects. Their work spans across several subfields, notably Behavioral Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology, and Molecular Biology.

Their research primarily addresses topics such as Stress Responses and Cortisol, Tryptophan and brain disorders, Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research, Treatment of Major Depression, Adipose Tissue and Metabolism, Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research.

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Mariusz Papp are the following:

  • Perspectives for therapy of treatment-resistant depression (2021), British Journal of Pharmacology
  • Models of Affective Illness: Chronic Mild Stress in the Rat (2023), Current Protocols

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Piotr Gruca
  • Magdalena Łasoń
  • Ewa Litwa
  • Marco Andrea Riva
  • Veronica Begni

Mariusz Papp's publications are commonly found in several journals, the most frequent venues being:

  • European Neuropsychopharmacology
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology
  • Genes
  • Psychopharmacology

Best Publications

  • Chronic mild stress-induced anhedonia : a realistic animal model of depression

    Paul Willner;Richard Muscat;Mariusz Papp

  • An animal model of anhedonia: attenuation of sucrose consumption and place preference conditioning by chronic unpredictable mild stress.

    Mariusz Papp;Paul Willner;Richard Muscat

  • Hippocampal cytogenesis correlates to escitalopram-mediated recovery in a chronic mild stress rat model of depression.

    Magdalena N Jayatissa;Christina Bisgaard;Anders Tingström;Mariusz Papp

  • Effect of agomelatine in the chronic mild stress model of depression in the rat.

    Mariusz Papp;Piotr Gruca;Pierre-Alain Boyer;Elisabeth Mocaër

  • Antidepressant activity of non-competitive and competitive NMDA receptor antagonists in a chronic mild stress model of depression

    Mariusz Papp;Elżbieta Moryl

  • Reversal of stress-induced anhedonia by the atypical antidepressants, fluoxetine and maprotiline

    Richard Muscat;Mariusz Papp;Paul Willner

  • Pharmacological validation of the chronic mild stress model of depression

    Mariusz Papp;Elisabeta Moryl;Paul Willner

  • Decreased hedonic responsiveness following chronic mild stress is not secondary to loss of body weight

    Paul Willner;Jean-Luc Moreau;Christina Kurre Nielsen;Mariusz Papp

  • Parallel changes in dopamine D2 receptor binding in limbic forebrain associated with chronic mild stress-induced anhedonia and its reversal by imipramine

    Mariusz Papp;Violetta Klimek;Paul Willner

  • Escitalopram (S-enantiomer of citalopram): clinical efficacy and onset of action predicted from a rat model.

    Stuart A. Montgomery;Henrik Loft;Connie Sánchez;Elin Heldbo Reines

  • Anxiolytic-like activity of agomelatine and melatonin in three animal models of anxiety.

    Mariusz Papp;Ewa Litwa;Piotr Gruca;Elisabeth Mocaër

  • S33005, a novel ligand at both serotonin and norepinephrine transporters: II. Behavioral profile in comparison with venlafaxine, reboxetine, citalopram, and clomipramine.

    Millan Mj;Dekeyne A;Papp M;La Rochelle Cd

  • Effect of Chronic Mild Stress on Circadian Rhythms in the Locomotor Activity in Rats

    Zbigniew Gorka;Elzbieta Moryl;Mariusz Papp

  • S32006, a novel 5-HT2C receptor antagonist displaying broad-based antidepressant and anxiolytic properties in rodent models

    Anne Dekeyne;Clotilde Mannoury la Cour;Alain Gobert;Mauricette Brocco

  • Antidepressant-like effects of dopamine agonists in an animal model of depression

    Richard Muscat;Mariusz Papp;Paul Willner

  • The effects of cannabinoid CB1, CB2 and vanilloid TRPV1 receptor antagonists on cocaine addictive behavior in rats.

    Przemysław Adamczyk;Joanna Miszkiel;Andrew C. McCreary;Małgorzata Filip

  • Changes in dopamine receptor mRNA expression following chronic mild stress and chronic antidepressant treatment.

    M Dziedzicka-Wasylewska;P Willner;M Papp

  • Effects of imipramine on serotonergic and beta-adrenergic receptor binding in a realistic animal model of depression.

    Mariusz Papp;Violetta Klimek;Paul Willner

  • Antidepressant-like activity of zinc: further behavioral and molecular evidence.

    Magdalena Sowa-Kućma;Beata Legutko;Beata Legutko;Bernadeta Szewczyk;Kinga Novak

  • An animal model of anhedonia.

    P. Willner;R. Muscat;M. Papp

  • Effect of chronic treatment with imipramine on interleukin 1 and interleukin 2 production by splenocytes obtained from rats subjected to a chronic mild stress model of depression.

    Kubera M;Symbirtsev A;Basta-Kaim A;Borycz J

  • Attenuation of place preference conditioning but not place aversion conditioning by chronic mild stress.

    Mariusz Papp;Spiros Lappas;Richard Muscat;Paul Willner

  • Pharmacological validation of the chronic mild stress model of depression

    M. Papp

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Willner
Paul Willner Swansea University
Marco A. Riva
Marco A. Riva University of Milan
Andrzej Pilc
Andrzej Pilc Polish Academy of Sciences
Gabriel Nowak
Gabriel Nowak Jagiellonian University
Francesca Calabrese
Francesca Calabrese University of Milan
Władysław Lasoń
Władysław Lasoń Polish Academy of Sciences
Mark J. Millan
Mark J. Millan University of Glasgow
Michael Maes
Michael Maes University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Stuart Montgomery
Stuart Montgomery Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in neuroscience or a related field, several online pathways can help you build a strong foundation in the behavioral and mental health sciences. Many students turn to cacrep-accredited programs due to their rigorous academic standards and alignment with state licensure requirements for counselors.

For those interested in clinical work, pursuing an online counseling degree provides the flexibility to balance studies with other commitments, while equipping you with essential interpersonal and research skills. Additionally, online mft programs accredited by reputable organizations ensure your degree is recognized by employers and professional boards, preparing you for specialized therapy careers.

If your interests are broader, earning the cheapest online master's degree in psychology can open doors in research, counseling, education, and healthcare. Carefully choosing accredited and affordable online programs can greatly enhance your career prospects and provide a versatile skill set, whether your goal is direct patient care or neuroscience research.

Best Scientists Citing Mariusz Papp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles