World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 53 15924 14617 6614 5909 98 16752

Stephen A. Rehner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephen A. Rehner between 1988 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephen A. Rehner published across 39 years, from 1988 to 2026, averaging 2.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2005. 3 of the 102 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2005. 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 3 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication 2026: 2 publications
1988 2026

102 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephen A. Rehner: publications per year, 1988 to 2026
Year Publications
1988 2
1989 1
1990 2
1991 1
1992 0
1993 2
1994 4
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 4
1999 2
2000 2
2001 4
2002 0
2003 2
2004 3
2005 8
2006 5
2007 2
2008 2
2009 4
2010 3
2011 7
2012 5
2013 6
2014 5
2015 3
2016 0
2017 6
2018 1
2019 2
2020 3
2021 1
2022 3
2023 1
2024 2
2025 1
2026 2
Total 102
Download as CSV

Stephen A. Rehner publications per year - data summary

  • Stephen A. Rehner, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from Agricultural Research Service, has 102 publications recorded across 39 years, from 1988 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1988 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2005, with 8 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1989, 1991, 1995, 2018 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 5 of the 39 years in the span carry no publications at all (1992, 1996, 1997, 2002 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 2.6 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.0 per year counting only the 34 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 9 publications, 9% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1988-2000: 21 publications (1.6 per year); 2001-2013: 51 publications (3.9 per year); 2014-2026: 30 publications (2.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Stephen A. Rehner publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen A. Rehner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 97–106 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 98 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546 98
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephen A. Rehner publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 19,587 Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 100 ranges running from 47–56 to 1,028+ publications.
  • Stephen A. Rehner, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from Agricultural Research Service, records 98 publications - the 5th percentile of the discipline.
  • 5% of ranked Biology and Biochemistry scientists score the same or lower than Stephen A. Rehner, and about 95% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 197–206 publications range, and Stephen A. Rehner ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 127–136 publications, holding 980 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 77% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 287–296 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Stephen A. Rehner D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen A. Rehner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 52–53 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025 53
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Stephen A. Rehner D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 19,587 Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 65 ranges running from 40–41 to 167+ D-Index.
  • Stephen A. Rehner, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from Agricultural Research Service, records 53 D-Index - the 19th percentile of the discipline.
  • 19% of ranked Biology and Biochemistry scientists score the same or lower than Stephen A. Rehner, and about 81% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 64–65 D-Index range, and Stephen A. Rehner ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 58–59 D-Index, holding 1,253 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 72–73 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Stephen A. Rehner is affiliated with the Agricultural Research Service in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on agricultural and biological sciences, with significant contributions to biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Within these broader fields, their work specifically addresses insect science, plant science, molecular biology, ecology, evolution, behavior, systematics, and cell biology.

The main topics covered in Stephen A. Rehner's research include entomopathogenic microorganisms in pest control, insect symbiosis and bacterial influences, insect resistance and genetics, nematode management and characterization studies, plant pathogens and fungal diseases, research on scale insects, and insect and arachnid ecology and behavior.

Frequent venues for publication by Stephen A. Rehner are the Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, Biological Control, Science, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, and Microbiology Resource Announcements. These publications demonstrate a focus on the biological control of pests and fungal pathogen research related to insects and plants.

Their recent published papers include:

  • "Several Metarhizium Species Produce Ergot Alkaloids in a Condition-Specific Manner," 2020, Applied and Environmental Microbiology
  • "The coevolution of fungus-ant agriculture," 2024, Science
  • "Local isolates of Beauveria bassiana for control of the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei in Puerto Rico: Virulence, efficacy and persistence," 2021, Biological Control
  • "Genetic structure of Metarhizium species in western USA: Finite populations composed of divergent clonal lineages with limited evidence for recent recombination," 2020, Journal of Invertebrate Pathology
  • "Genome Resources for the Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Species Complex: 13 Tree Endophytes from the Neotropics and Paleotropics," 2023, Microbiology Resource Announcements

Stephen A. Rehner often collaborates with other researchers, including Vinson P. Doyle, Chiara Pedrazzini, Franco Widmer, J. Enkerli, and Giovana Matos Franco. These collaborations have contributed to various aspects of their research fields, reflecting interdisciplinary engagement and coauthorship in multiple projects.

Best Publications

  • A Beauveria phylogeny inferred from nuclear ITS and EF1-alpha sequences: evidence for cryptic diversification and links to Cordyceps teleomorphs.

    Stephen A. Rehner;Ellen Buckley

  • The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation

    Edward Allen Herre;Nancy Knowlton;Nancy Knowlton;Ulrich Gerhard Mueller;Stuart A. Rehner

  • A multilocus phylogeny of the Metarhizium anisopliae lineage

    Joseph F. Bischoff;Stephen A. Rehner;Richard A. Humber

  • Phylogenetic relationships of agaric fungi based on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences.

    Jean-Marc Moncalvo;François M. Lutzoni;Stephen A. Rehner;Jacqui Johnson

  • Evolutionary History of the Symbiosis Between Fungus-Growing Ants and Their Fungi

    Ignacio H. Chapela;Stephen A. Rehner;Ted R. Schultz;Ulrich G. Mueller

  • Phylogeny and systematics of the anamorphic, entomopathogenic genus Beauveria

    Stephen A. Rehner;Andrew M. Minnis;Gi-Ho Sung;J. Jennifer Luangsa-ard

  • Phylogeny of mycoplasmalike organisms (Phytoplasmas): a basis for their classification.

    D. E. Gundersen;Ing-Ming Lee;S. A. Rehner;R. E. Davis

  • Phylogenetic analyses of RPB1 and RPB2 support a middle Cretaceous origin for a clade comprising all agriculturally and medically important fusaria

    Kerry O’Donnell;Alejandro P. Rooney;Robert H. Proctor;Daren W. Brown

  • Ancient tripartite coevolution in the attine ant-microbe symbiosis.

    Cameron Robert Currie;Bess Wong;Alison E. Stuart;Ted R. Schultz

  • Colletotrichum gloeosporioides s.l. associated with Theobroma cacao and other plants in Panama: multilocus phylogenies distinguish host-associated pathogens from asymptomatic endophytes.

    Enith I. Rojas;Stephen A. Rehner;Gary J. Samuels;Sunshine A. Van Bael

  • A phylogenetically-based nomenclature for Cordycipitaceae (Hypocreales).

    Ryan M. Kepler;J. Jennifer Luangsa-ard;Nigel L. Hywel-Jones;C. Alisha Quandt

  • Inoculation of coffee plants with the fungal entomopathogen Beauveria bassiana (Ascomycota: Hypocreales).

    Francisco Posada;M. Catherine Aime;Stephen W. Peterson;Stephen A. Rehner

  • One Fungus, One Name: Defining the Genus Fusarium in a Scientifically Robust Way That Preserves Longstanding Use

    David M. Geiser;Takayuki Aoki;Charles W. Bacon;Scott E. Baker

  • Clarification of generic and species boundaries for Metarhizium and related fungi through multigene phylogenetics

    Ryan Michael Kepler;Richard A. Humber;Joseph F. Bischoff;Stephen A. Rehner

  • Fungal endophyte diversity in coffee plants from Colombia, Hawai'i, Mexico and Puerto Rico

    Fernando E. Vega;Ann Simpkins;M. Catherine Aime;Francisco Posada

  • Phylogenetic diversity of insecticolous fusaria inferred from multilocus DNA sequence data and their molecular identification via FUSARIUM-ID and Fusarium MLST

    Kerry O’Donnell;Richard A. Humber;David M. Geiser;Seogchan Kang

  • Phylogenetic-based nomenclatural proposals for Ophiocordycipitaceae (Hypocreales) with new combinations in Tolypocladium.

    C. Alisha Quandt;Ryan M. Kepler;Walter Gams;João P.M. Araújo

  • Phylogeny and historical biogeography of true morels (Morchella) reveals an early Cretaceous origin and high continental endemism and provincialism in the Holarctic.

    Kerry O’Donnell;Alejandro P. Rooney;Gary L. Mills;Michael Kuo

  • Metarhizium frigidum sp. nov.: a cryptic species of M. anisopliae and a member of the M. flavoviride complex

    Joseph F. Bischoff;Stephen A. Rehner;Richard A. Humber

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard A. Humber
Richard A. Humber Agricultural Research Service
Kerry O'Donnell
Kerry O'Donnell National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research
Ulrich G. Mueller
Ulrich G. Mueller The University of Texas at Austin
Alejandro P. Rooney
Alejandro P. Rooney National Center for Agricultural Utilization Research
Rytas Vilgalys
Rytas Vilgalys Duke University
M. Catherine Aime
M. Catherine Aime Purdue University West Lafayette
J. Jennifer Luangsa-ard
J. Jennifer Luangsa-ard National Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
David M. Geiser
David M. Geiser Pennsylvania State University
Vincent Robert
Vincent Robert Utrecht University
Pedro W. Crous
Pedro W. Crous Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry can open the door to a wide array of online degrees and fast-track career pathways in healthcare and the sciences. If you're interested in advanced clinical roles, nursing programs are a popular choice. Options such as the fastest pmhnp program and the 1 year post master's fnp online certificate offer accelerated pathways for nurses seeking specialized practice in mental health or family care.

For students considering nutrition, highly affordable programs are increasingly available. Those looking to integrate biochemistry with wellness may find the online dietitian degree options especially appealing.

Additionally, registered nurses interested in building on their scientific knowledge can pursue the rn to bsn route—another flexible online pathway that can lead to advanced roles and broader career prospects.

Overall, whether you’re aiming for specialized practice or a cost-effective credential, these online programs are designed to support your educational journey in the sciences and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen A. Rehner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles