World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
48
Citations
25826
World Ranking
5381
National Ranking
1967

Robert J. Andres publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Andres sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 112 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Robert J. Andres D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Andres sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert J. Andres is affiliated with Oak Ridge National Laboratory in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on environmental science, with particular attention to global and planetary change and atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics.

The scientist has contributed to various publication venues, including:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)

The recent papers by Robert J. Andres include:

  • Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions: 1751-2017, 2020, published in OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions: 1751-2017, 2020, published in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • CEDS v_2019_12_23 Emission Data, 2020, published in OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions: 1751-2017, 2020, published in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Frequent coauthors working alongside Robert J. Andres include:

  • Dennis Gilfillan
  • Gregg Marland
  • T. A. Boden
  • Rachel Hoesly
  • Patrick O'Rourke

The main fields of study in Robert J. Andres' work are environmental science with a subfield focus on global and planetary change. The primary research topics address atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, reflecting a specialized interest in emissions and their global impact.

Best Publications

  • Global Carbon Budget 2016

    Corinne Le Quere;Robbie M. Andrew;Josep G. Canadell;Stephen Sitch

  • Global Carbon Budget 2015

    C. Le Quéré;R. Moriarty;R. M. Andrew;J. G. Canadell

  • Global carbon budget 2013

    C. Le Quere;G.P. Peters;R.J. Andres;Robbie M Andrew

  • Historical (1750–2014) anthropogenic emissions of reactive gases and aerosols from the Community Emissions Data System (CEDS)

    Rachel M. Hoesly;Steven J. Smith;Leyang Feng;Zbigniew Klimont

  • Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China

    Z Liu;Dabo Guan;Wei Wei;Steven J Davis

  • Anthropogenic sulfur dioxide emissions: 1850–2005

    S. J. Smith;J. Van Aardenne;Z. Klimont;Robert Joseph Andres

  • The HadGEM2-ES implementation of CMIP5 centennial simulations

    C. D. Jones;J. K. Hughes;Nicolas Bellouin;S. C. Hardiman

  • A time‐averaged inventory of subaerial volcanic sulfur emissions

    R. J. Andres;A. D. Kasgnoc

  • The global carbon budget 1959-2011

    C. Le Quere;R.J. Andres;T.A. Boden;T. Conway

  • The Open-source Data Inventory for Anthropogenic CO 2 , version 2016 (ODIAC2016): a global monthly fossil fuel CO 2 gridded emissions data product for tracer transport simulations and surface flux inversions

    Tomohiro Oda;Tomohiro Oda;Shamil Maksyutov;Robert J. Andres

  • China: Emissions pattern of the world leader in CO2 emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement production

    J Gregg;Robert Joseph Andres;Gregg Marland;Gregg Marland

  • Drivers of declining CO2 emissions in 18 developed economies

    Corinne Le Quéré;Jan Ivar Korsbakken;Charlie Wilson;Charlie Wilson;Jale Tosun

  • A synthesis of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil-fuel combustion

    R.J. Andres;T.A. Boden;F.-M. Bréon;P. Ciais

  • A 1° × 1° distribution of carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement manufacture, 1950–1990

    Robert J. Andres;Gregg Marland;Inez Fung;Elaine Matthews

  • Current systematic carbon-cycle observations and the need for implementing a policy-relevant carbon observing system

    P. Ciais;A. J. Dolman;A. Bombelli;R. Duren

  • Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions (1751 - 2014) (V. 2017)

    Dennis Gilfillan;Gregg Marland;Tom Boden;Robert Andres

  • Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions, 1751 - 2006 (published 2009)

    Thomas A. Boden;G. Marland;Robert J. Andres

  • Carbon dioxide emissions from fossil‐fuel use, 1751–1950

    R. J. Andres;D. J. Fielding;G. Marland;T. A. Boden

  • Improving the temporal and spatial distribution of CO2 emissions from global fossil fuel emission data sets

    Ray Nassar;Louis Napier-Linton;Louis Napier-Linton;Kevin R. Gurney;Robert J. Andres

  • Monthly, global emissions of carbon dioxide from fossil fuel consumption

    Robert Joseph Andres;JS Gregg;London M Losey;Gregg Marland

  • Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions, 1751 - 2007 (Version 2010)

    Thomas A. Boden;G. Marland;Robert J. Andres

Frequent Co-Authors

Tomohiro Oda
Tomohiro Oda Universities Space Research Association
Gregg Marland
Gregg Marland Appalachian State University
Shamil Maksyutov
Shamil Maksyutov National Institute for Environmental Studies
Tatsuya Yokota
Tatsuya Yokota National Institute for Environmental Studies
Qiang Zhang
Qiang Zhang Peking University
Glen P. Peters
Glen P. Peters Center for International Climate and Environmental Research
Zbigniew Klimont
Zbigniew Klimont International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Christian Rödenbeck
Christian Rödenbeck Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
Qiang Zhang
Qiang Zhang Tsinghua University
Sönke Zaehle
Sönke Zaehle Max Planck Society

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their studies in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many professionals seek flexible options like doctoral programs online no dissertation, which enable them to earn advanced credentials without the extensive research demands of traditional PhDs.

Educators and administrators aiming to enhance their expertise may find valuable opportunities through eds to edd programs online. These degrees focus on leadership and policy skills, relevant for environmental advocacy and educational program development.

For those looking to combine environmental concerns with social welfare, pursuing dsw online programs offers a pathway to impact community well-being and policy from a social sciences perspective.

Additionally, students seeking cost-effective and broad academic foundations should explore the most affordable online general studies degree programs. Such flexibility can support customized learning aligned with environmental interests and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Robert J. Andres

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles