World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Günther R. Raidl

Günther R. Raidl

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
44
Citations
9691
World Ranking
7488
National Ranking
60

Mathematics

D-Index
41
Citations
9090
World Ranking
1877
National Ranking
25

Günther R. Raidl publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Günther R. Raidl sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 252 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Günther R. Raidl D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Günther R. Raidl sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

Günther R. Raidl is affiliated with TU Wien in Austria and has contributed extensively to the fields of Engineering and Computer Science. Their research spans various subfields, with a significant focus on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Automotive Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, and Computational Theory and Mathematics.

The scientist's work covers multiple topics within these fields, including:

  • Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods
  • Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Algorithms and Data Compression
  • Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms
  • Scheduling and Timetabling Solutions
  • Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
  • Advanced Graph Theory Research

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Applied Soft Computing
  • Energies
  • Computers & Operations Research
  • Procedia Computer Science

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Finding Longest Common Subsequences: New anytime A∗ search results" (2020, Applied Soft Computing)
  • "Smart Charging of Electric Vehicles Considering SOC-Dependent Maximum Charging Powers" (2021, Energies)
  • "A∗-based construction of decision diagrams for a prize-collecting scheduling problem" (2020, Computers & Operations Research)
  • "Solving the Longest Common Subsequence Problem Concerning Non-Uniform Distributions of Letters in Input Strings" (2021, Mathematics)
  • "Computational Methods for Scheduling the Charging and Assignment of an On-Site Shared Electric Vehicle Fleet" (2022, IEEE Access)

Raidl's network of frequent coauthors includes Marko Djukanović, Christian Blum, Tobias Rodemann, Nikolaus Frohner, and Johannes Varga, with each collaborator having contributed alongside Raidl numerous times.

Best Publications

  • Hybrid metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization: A survey

    Christian Blum;Jakob Puchinger;Günther R. Raidl;Andrea Roli

  • Handbook of Metaheuristics

    Unknown

  • Combining metaheuristics and exact algorithms in combinatorial optimization: a survey and classification

    Jakob Puchinger;Günther R. Raidl

  • Evolutionary Computation in Combinatorial Optimization

    Jens Gottlieb;Günther R. Raidl

  • Edge sets: an effective evolutionary coding of spanning trees

    G.R. Raidl;B.A. Julstrom

  • The Multidimensional Knapsack Problem: Structure and Algorithms

    Jakob Puchinger;Günther R. Raidl;Ulrich Pferschy

  • Metaheuristics for solving a multimodal home-healthcare scheduling problem

    Gerhard Hiermann;Matthias Prandtstetter;Andrea Rendl;Jakob Puchinger

  • A unified view on hybrid metaheuristics

    Günther R. Raidl

  • Combining (Integer) Linear Programming Techniques and Metaheuristics for Combinatorial Optimization

    Günther R. Raidl;Jakob Puchinger

  • Models and algorithms for three-stage two-dimensional bin packing

    Jakob Puchinger;Günther R. Raidl

  • Balancing bicycle sharing systems: a variable neighborhood search approach

    Marian Rainer-Harbach;Petrina Papazek;Bin Hu;Günther R. Raidl

  • An improved genetic algorithm for the multiconstrained 0-1 knapsack problem

    G.R. Raidl

  • Balancing Bicycle Sharing Systems: An Approach for the Dynamic Case

    Christian Kloimüllner;Petrina Papazek;Bin Hu;Günther R. Raidl

  • Prüfer numbers: a poor representation of spanning trees for evolutionary search

    Jens Gottlieb;Bryant A. Julstrom;Günther R. Raidl;Franz Rothlauf

  • Greedy heuristics and an evolutionary algorithm for the bounded-diameter minimum spanning tree problem

    Günther R. Raidl;Bryant A. Julstrom

  • An efficient evolutionary algorithm for the degree-constrained minimum spanning tree problem

    G.R. Raidl

  • Empirical Analysis of Locality, Heritability and Heuristic Bias in Evolutionary Algorithms: A Case Study for the Multidimensional Knapsack Problem

    Günther R. Raidl;Jens R. Gottlieb

  • Solving the post enrolment course timetabling problem by ant colony optimization

    Clemens Nothegger;Alfred Mayer;Andreas M. Chwatal;Günther R. Raidl

  • An Integer Linear Programming Approach and a Hybrid Variable Neighborhood Search for the Car Sequencing Problem

    Matthias Prandtstetter;Günther R. Raidl

  • A weighted coding in a genetic algorithm for the degree-constrained minimum spanning tree problem

    Günther R. Raidl;Bryant A. Julstrom

  • Part E: Evolutionary Computation

    Frank Neumann;Carsten Witt;Peter Merz;Carlos A. Coello Coello

  • Neighbourhood searches for the bounded diameter minimum spanning tree problem embedded in a VNS, EA, and ACO

    Martin Gruber;Jano van Hemert;Günther R. Raidl

  • Applications of Evolutionary Computing - EvoWorkshops 2004: EvoBio, EvoComNet, EvoHOT, EvoIASP, EvoMUSART, EvoSTOC, Coimbra, Portugal

    Günther R. Raidl;Stefano Cagnoni;Jürgen Branke;David Wolfe Corne

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Blum
Christian Blum Spanish National Research Council
Martin Middendorf
Martin Middendorf Leipzig University
Ulrich Pferschy
Ulrich Pferschy University of Graz
David Corne
David Corne Heriot-Watt University
Elena Marchiori
Elena Marchiori Radboud University
Yew-Soon Ong
Yew-Soon Ong Nanyang Technological University
Petra Mutzel
Petra Mutzel University of Bonn
Karl Mechtler
Karl Mechtler Research Institute of Molecular Pathology
Jan-Michael Peters
Jan-Michael Peters Research Institute of Molecular Pathology
Frank Eisenhaber
Frank Eisenhaber Agency for Science, Technology and Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Mathematics graduates often explore interdisciplinary fields to enhance their career prospects. One promising direction is pursuing an ms in digital marketing degree cost tuition fees carefully, which combines analytical skills with market insights, offering excellent job opportunities in the evolving digital economy.

For those aiming at leadership roles, business education is a great complement to mathematical expertise. Many students consider one year mba programs that provide an accelerated path to gaining essential business knowledge without a long gap in their career.

Flexibility is key, and online options are popular among professionals. Online MBA programs often incorporate policies like online mba transfer credits, allowing students to make the most of their previous academic work and reduce time and cost.

Additionally, data-driven roles are expanding rapidly. Pursuing data analysis programs enhances capabilities in interpreting complex data — a skill highly sought after in finance, technology, and consulting sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Günther R. Raidl

Trending Scientists