World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
5773
World Ranking
9834
National Ranking
4139

Russell Bent publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Russell Bent sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 162 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Russell Bent D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Russell Bent sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Russell Bent is affiliated with Los Alamos National Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of engineering, with significant contributions to electrical and electronic engineering, control and systems engineering, civil and structural engineering, safety, risk, reliability and quality, as well as management science and operations research.

Their work covers several topics related to power systems and energy management, including:

  • Optimal Power Flow Distribution
  • Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Electric Power System Optimization
  • Power System Reliability and Maintenance
  • Microgrid Control and Optimization
  • Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
  • Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis

Bent has published extensively in multiple venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Electric Power Systems Research
  • INFORMS Journal on Computing
  • Energies
  • IEEE Transactions on Power Systems

Some recent papers authored by Bent cover topics such as interdependent infrastructure restoration, optimal power flow, and resilient distribution systems. Selected recent publications include:

  • "Last-Mile Restoration for Multiple Interdependent Infrastructures," 2021, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Proving global optimality of ACOPF solutions," 2020, Electric Power Systems Research
  • "Learning to accelerate globally optimal solutions to the AC Optimal Power Flow problem," 2022, Electric Power Systems Research
  • "Communication-Constrained Expansion Planning for Resilient Distribution Systems," 2020, INFORMS Journal on Computing
  • "Optimal Microgrid Networking for Maximal Load Delivery in Phase Unbalanced Distribution Grids: A Declarative Modeling Approach," 2022, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, notably:

  • Kaarthik Sundar
  • Byron Tasseff
  • Carleton Coffrin
  • Ádám Máté
  • Pascal Van Hentenryck

Best Publications

  • Scenario-Based Planning for Partially Dynamic Vehicle Routing with Stochastic Customers

    Russell W. Bent;Pascal Van Hentenryck

  • A Two-Stage Hybrid Local Search for the Vehicle Routing Problem with Time Windows

    Russell Bent;Pascal Van Hentenryck

  • A two-stage hybrid algorithm for pickup and delivery vehicle routing problems with time windows

    Russell Bent;Pascal Van Hentenryck

  • PowerModels.J1: An Open-Source Framework for Exploring Power Flow Formulations

    Carleton Coffrin;Russell Bent;Kaarthik Sundar;Yeesian Ng

  • Online Stochastic Combinatorial Optimization

    Pascal Van Hentenryck;Russell Bent

  • Battle of the Water Networks II

    Angela Marchi;Elad Salomons;Avi Ostfeld;Zoran Kapelan

  • Convex Relaxations for Gas Expansion Planning

    Conrado Borraz-Sanchez;Russell Whitford Bent;Scott N. Backhaus;Hassan Hijazi

  • Strategic planning for disaster recovery with stochastic last mile distribution

    Pascal Van Hentenryck;Russell Bent;Carleton Coffrin

  • Security-Constrained Design of Isolated Multi-Energy Microgrids

    Salman Mashayekh;Michael Stadler;Goncalo Cardoso;Miguel Heleno

  • Locating PHEV Exchange Stations in V2G

    Feng Pan;Russell Bent;Alan Berscheid;David Izraelevitz

  • Optimal Compression in Natural Gas Networks: A Geometric Programming Approach

    Sidhant Misra;Michael W. Fisher;Scott Backhaus;Russell Bent

  • Waiting and relocation strategies in online stochastic vehicle routing

    Russell Bent;Pascal Van Hentenryck

  • Regrets only! online stochastic optimization under time constraints

    Russell Bent;Pascal Van Hentenryck

  • Cyber-Physical Security: A Game Theory Model of Humans Interacting Over Control Systems

    Scott Backhaus;Russell Bent;James Bono;Ritchie Lee

  • Approximating line losses and apparent power in AC power flow linearizations

    C. Coffrin;P. Van Hentenryck;R. Bent

  • Vehicle routing for the last mile of power system restoration

    Pascal Van Hentenryck;Carleton Coffrin;Russell Bent

  • Polyhedral approximation in mixed-integer convex optimization

    Miles Lubin;Emre Yamangil;Russell Bent;Juan Pablo Vielma

  • Convex Optimization for Joint Expansion Planning of Natural Gas and Power Systems

    Conrado Borraz Sanchez;Russell Bent;Scott Backhaus;Seth Blumsack

  • Transmission Network Expansion Planning With Complex Power Flow Models

    R. Bent;G. L. Toole;A. Berscheid

  • Extended Formulations in Mixed-Integer Convex Programming

    Miles Lubin;Emre Yamangil;Russell Bent;Juan Pablo Vielma

  • The value of consensus in online stochastic scheduling

    Russell Bent;Pascal Van Hentenryck

  • An adaptive, multivariate partitioning algorithm for global optimization of nonconvex programs

    Harsha Nagarajan;Mowen Lu;Site Wang;Russell Bent

Frequent Co-Authors

Pascal Van Hentenryck
Pascal Van Hentenryck Georgia Institute of Technology
Scott Backhaus
Scott Backhaus Los Alamos National Laboratory
Michael Chertkov
Michael Chertkov University of Arizona
Daniel Bienstock
Daniel Bienstock Columbia University
David H. Wolpert
David H. Wolpert Santa Fe Institute
Jeff Linderoth
Jeff Linderoth University of Wisconsin–Madison
Sylvie Thiébaux
Sylvie Thiébaux Australian National University
Avi Ostfeld
Avi Ostfeld Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Kameshwar Poolla
Kameshwar Poolla University of California, Berkeley
Xiaonan Lu
Xiaonan Lu Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in computer science opens up a wide range of career pathways, but it’s helpful to consider related fields as well. Many students are interested in how skills from computer science can translate into interdisciplinary careers, like in environmental science. If you’re curious about broadening your options, find out what can i do with an environmental science degree to see how technology and science can work together.

For those aiming to enter the workforce quickly, pursuing the fastest computer science degree can help you graduate at an accelerated pace. Budget is also a major factor. If you are interested in cost-effective online options related to computer science, examine the cheapest online environmental science degree and compare programs for affordability.

Engineering is another field with strong ties to computer science. To understand the mechanical engineering cost of education, explore the latest data on tuition and expenses in this area. Researching your options across these related disciplines can help you make smarter, more informed decisions about your educational and career future.

Best Scientists Citing Russell Bent

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles