World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
63
Citations
13459
World Ranking
1792
National Ranking
580

Cass T. Miller publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cass T. Miller sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 308 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Cass T. Miller D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cass T. Miller sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cass T. Miller is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily lies within the field of engineering, with notable contributions to several subfields including computational mechanics, ocean engineering, environmental engineering, mechanical engineering, and biomedical engineering.

Their studies focus on a variety of topics related to fluid dynamics and porous media, including enhanced oil recovery techniques, heat and mass transfer in porous media, lattice Boltzmann simulation studies, hydraulic fracturing and reservoir analysis, groundwater flow and contamination studies, rheology and fluid dynamics studies, and CO2 sequestration and geologic interactions.

Recent publications by Cass T. Miller include:

  • "Modeling cross model non-Newtonian fluid flow in porous media," 2020, Journal of Contaminant Hydrology
  • "Molecular methods for assessing the morphology, topology, and performance of polyamide membranes," 2021, Journal of Membrane Science
  • "Towards Understanding Factors Affecting Arsenic, Chromium, and Vanadium Mobility in the Subsurface," 2022, Water
  • "A continuum mechanical framework for modeling tumor growth and treatment in two- and three-phase systems," 2021, Archive of Applied Mechanics
  • "Generalized Newtonian fluid flow in porous media," 2021, Physical Review Fluids

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Miller include William G. Gray, T. M. Weigand, Christopher A. Bowers, Riley Vickers, and Orlando Coronell.

Their work has been published notably in the following venues:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Physical Review E
  • Physics of Fluids
  • Journal of Hydraulic Research
  • OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)

Best Publications

  • An evaluation of lattice Boltzmann schemes for porous medium flow simulation

    Chongxun Pan;Li Shi Luo;Cass T. Miller

  • Dissolution of Trapped Nonaqueous Phase Liquids: Mass Transfer Characteristics

    Cass T. Miller;Michele M. Poirier-McNeil;Alex S. Mayer

  • Lattice‐Boltzmann simulation of two‐phase flow in porous media

    C. Pan;M. Hilpert;C. T. Miller

  • Pore-morphology-based simulation of drainage in totally wetting porous media

    Markus Hilpert;Cass T. Miller

  • Multiphase flow and transport modeling in heterogeneous porous media: challenges and approaches

    Cass T. Miller;George Christakos;Paul T. Imhoff;John F. McBride

  • Pore-scale investigation of viscous coupling effects for two-phase flow in porous media.

    Huina Li;Chongxun Pan;Cass T. Miller

  • Comprehensive Comparison of Pore-Scale Models for Multiphase Flow in Porous Media

    Benzhong Zhao;Christopher W. MacMinn;Bauyrzhan K. Primkulov;Yu Chen

  • Modelling the fate of oxidisable organic contaminants in groundwater

    D.A. Barry;H. Prommer;C.T. Miller;Peter Knudegaard Engesgaard

  • Introduction to the Thermodynamically Constrained Averaging Theory for Porous Medium Systems

    William G. Gray;Cass T. Miller

  • Accurate and economical solution of the pressure-head form of Richards' equation by the method of lines

    Michael D. Tocci;C.T. Kelley;Cass T. Miller

  • Thermodynamically constrained averaging theory approach for modeling flow and transport phenomena in porous medium systems: 1. Motivation and overview

    William G. Gray;Cass T. Miller

  • The influence of mass transfer characteristics and porous media heterogeneity on nonaqueous phase dissolution

    Alex S. Mayer;Cass T. Miller

  • Robust solution of Richards' equation for nonuniform porous media

    Cass T. Miller;G. A. Williams;Carl Tim Kelley;Michael D. Tocci;Michael D. Tocci

  • Pore-scale modeling of saturated permeabilities in random sphere packings.

    Chongxun Pan;Markus Hilpert;Cass T. Miller

  • The influence of porous medium characteristics and measurement scale on pore-scale distributions of residual nonaqueous-phase liquids

    Alex S. Mayer;Cass T. Miller

  • Cosolvent-enhanced remediation of residual dense nonaqueous phase liquids: experimental investigation.

    Paul T. Imhoff;Simon N. Gleyzer;John F. McBride;Laura A. Vancho

  • A multiphase model for three-dimensional tumor growth.

    G. Sciumè;S. Shelton;William G Gray;Cass T Miller

  • Use of a reactive surface-diffusion model to describe apparent sorption-desorption hysteresis and abiotic degradation of lindane in a subsurface material

    Cass T. Miller;Joseph A. Pedit

  • Pore‐Scale Modeling of Nonwetting‐Phase Residual in Porous Media

    Michael I. Lowry;Cass T. Miller

  • Sorption of hydrophobic organic pollutants in saturated soil systems

    Cass T. Miller;Cass T. Miller;Walter J. Weber;Walter J. Weber

  • Computation of the interfacial area for two-fluid porous medium systems.

    Elisa Dalla;Markus Hilpert;Cass T Miller

  • Modelling the fate of oxidisable organic contaminants in groundwater. In C. T. Miller, M. B. Parlange, and S. M. Hassanizadeh (editors),

    D. A. Barry;H. Prommer;C. T. Miller;P. Engesgaard

Frequent Co-Authors

William G. Gray
William G. Gray University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Carl Tim Kelley
Carl Tim Kelley North Carolina State University
David Andrew Barry
David Andrew Barry École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Jan F. Prins
Jan F. Prins University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Walter J. Weber
Walter J. Weber University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michael D. Aitken
Michael D. Aitken University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Bernhard A. Schrefler
Bernhard A. Schrefler University of Padua
Henning Prommer
Henning Prommer University of Western Australia
Treavor H. Boyer
Treavor H. Boyer Arizona State University
Philip C. Singer
Philip C. Singer University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Cass T. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles