World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ulf Jeppsson

Ulf Jeppsson

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
44
Citations
7707
World Ranking
6725
National Ranking
124

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
44
Citations
7708
World Ranking
5802
National Ranking
47

Ulf Jeppsson publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulf Jeppsson sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 176 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Ulf Jeppsson D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulf Jeppsson sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulf Jeppsson is affiliated with Lund University in Sweden and has an extensive publication record in the fields of Environmental Science and Engineering. Their research spans a variety of subfields including Water Science and Technology, Building and Construction, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Pollution, and Environmental Engineering.

The scientist's work focuses on several main topics such as Building Energy and Comfort Optimization, Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies, Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal, Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production, Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment, Geothermal Energy Systems and Applications, and Wastewater Treatment and Reuse.

Jeppsson has published in prominent venues, with frequent contributions to Water Science & Technology, Water Research, The Science of The Total Environment, and Water Environment Research. Notable recent papers include:

  • A plant-wide model describing GHG emissions and nutrient recovery options for water resource recovery facilities (2022, Water Research)
  • Modelling heat recovery potential from household wastewater (2020, Water Science & Technology)
  • Plant-wide modelling and analysis of WWTP temperature dynamics for sustainable heat recovery from wastewater (2021, Water Science & Technology)
  • City-wide model-based analysis of heat recovery from wastewater using an uncertainty-based approach (2022, The Science of The Total Environment)
  • Modelling temperature dynamics in sewer systems - comparing mechanistic and conceptual modelling approaches (2021, Water Science & Technology)

Their frequent coauthors include Xavier Flores-Alsina, Magnus Arnell, Damien J. Batstone, Christoffer Wärff, and Krist V. Gernaey. Jeppsson's publication record demonstrates collaborations spanning multiple researchers with significant joint contributions.

In addition to journal papers, Jeppsson has contributed to book publications with UWA Publishing, including:

  • Quantification and Modelling of Fugitive Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Urban Water Systems (2022)
  • Generalised Physicochemical Model (PCM) for Wastewater Processes (2022)
  • Celebrating passion for Water, Science and Technology (2022)

Best Publications

  • A framework for systems analysis of sustainable urban water management

    Daniel Hellström;Ulf Jeppsson;Erik Kärrman

  • Modelling Aspects of Wastewater Treatment Processes

    Ulf Jeppsson

  • Benchmark Simulation Model no. 1 (BSM1)

    J. Alex;L. Benedetti;J. Copp;K.V. Gernaey

  • Benchmark simulation model no 2: general protocol and exploratory case studies

    U. Jeppsson;Marie-Noëlle Pons;I. Nopens;J. Alex

  • Benchmarking of Control Strategies for Wastewater Treatment Plants

    Krist V. Gernaey;Ulf Jeppsson;Peter A. Vanrolleghem;John B. Copp

  • Benchmark Simulation Model No 2 – Finalisation of plant layout and default control strategy

    Ingmar Nopens;Lorenzo Benedetti;Ulf Jeppsson;Marie-Noëlle Pons

  • Towards a benchmark simulation model for plant-wide control strategy performance evaluation of WWTPs.

    Ulf Jeppsson;Christian Rosén;J Alex;J Copp

  • Aspects on ADM1 Implementation within the BSM2 Framework

    Christian Rosén;Ulf Jeppsson

  • Benchmark for evaluating control strategies in wastewater treatment plants

    J. Alex;J. F. Beteau;J. B. Copp;C. Hellinga

  • Implementing ADM1 for plant-wide benchmark simulations in Matlab/Simulink

    Christian Rosen;Darko Vrecko;Darko Vrecko;Krist Gernaey;Krist Gernaey;Marie-Noelle Pons

  • Integration of wastewater treatment plant design and operation - A systematic approach using cost functions

    Peter A. Vanrolleghem;Ulf Jeppsson;Jacob Carstensen;Bengt Carlsson

  • Modelling phosphorus (P), sulfur (S) and iron (Fe) interactions for dynamic simulations of anaerobic digestion processes.

    Xavier Flores-Alsina;Kimberly Solon;Christian Kazadi Mbamba;Stephan Tait

  • Dynamic influent pollutant disturbance scenario generation using a phenomenological modelling approach

    Krist V. Gernaey;Xavier Flores-Alsina;Christian Rosen;Lorenzo Benedetti

  • An ASM/ADM model interface for dynamic plant-wide simulation

    Ingmar Nopens;Damien J. Batstone;John B. Copp;Ulf Jeppsson

  • Balancing effluent quality, economic cost and greenhouse gas emissions during the evaluation of (plant-wide) control/operational strategies in WWTPs

    Xavier Flores-Alsina;Magnus Arnell;Youri Amerlinck;Lluís Corominas

  • The COST benchmark simulation model—current state and future perspective

    Ulf Jeppsson;Marie-Noëlle Pons

  • Plant-wide modelling of phosphorus transformations in wastewater treatment systems: Impacts of control and operational strategies

    K Solon;X Flores-Alsina;C Kazadi Mbamba;D Ikumi

  • Instrumentation, Control and Automation in wastewater - from London 1973 to Narbonne 2013

    G. Olsson;Bengt Carlsson;J. Comas;J. Copp

  • GISCOD: General Integrated Solid Waste Co-Digestion model

    Usama Zaher;Rongping Li;Rongping Li;Ulf Jeppsson;Jean-Philippe Steyer

  • Risk assessment modelling of microbiology-related solids separation problems in activated sludge systems

    J. Comas;I. Rodríguez-Roda;K. V. Gernaey;C. Rosen

  • Benchmarking of control strategies for wastewater treatment plants.

    K. V. Gernaey;U. Jeppsson;P. A. Vanrolleghem;J. B. Copp

Frequent Co-Authors

Krist V. Gernaey
Krist V. Gernaey Technical University of Denmark
Peter A. Vanrolleghem
Peter A. Vanrolleghem Université Laval
Damien J. Batstone
Damien J. Batstone University of Queensland
Ingmar Nopens
Ingmar Nopens Ghent University
Gustaf Olsson
Gustaf Olsson Lund University
Ignasi Rodríguez-Roda
Ignasi Rodríguez-Roda University of Girona
Jean-Philippe Steyer
Jean-Philippe Steyer INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Marie-Noëlle Pons
Marie-Noëlle Pons University of Lorraine
Manel Poch
Manel Poch University of Girona
Benedek G. Plósz
Benedek G. Plósz University of Bath

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore engineering and technology studies in the USA, consider how online and accelerated degree programs can expand your career options. Increasingly, leading universities and colleges now offer diverse online degrees to help you advance faster or pivot to new fields.

For example, if you’re interested in the business side of technology, online finance degree programs can help you gain crucial financial skills that complement your technical background. Those seeking leadership roles may consider one of the top accelerated mba programs, designed to build management expertise in less time.

Additionally, professionals interested in legal or administrative sectors might look at an accelerated paralegal program online or gain practical finance skills through a recognized bookkeeping certification. These pathways open doors to roles in compliance, administration, and finance.

Exploring these related online degrees helps you stay competitive and versatile in today’s evolving job market, whether you remain in engineering or choose a complementary career path.

Best Scientists Citing Ulf Jeppsson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles