World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 59 1559 1397 285 258 291 14072

Matthew R. Broome publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew R. Broome between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew R. Broome published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 11.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2025. 47 of the 358 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2025. 1994: 2 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 24 publications
1994 2025

358 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew R. Broome: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 2
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 2
2002 4
2003 6
2004 17
2005 9
2006 17
2007 20
2008 14
2009 17
2010 13
2011 12
2012 15
2013 11
2014 14
2015 17
2016 17
2017 15
2018 16
2019 12
2020 16
2021 21
2022 9
2023 15
2024 23
2025 24
Total 358
Download as CSV

Matthew R. Broome publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew R. Broome sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 284–293 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 291 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113 291
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew R. Broome D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew R. Broome sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105 59
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthew R. Broome is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their research spans the intersecting fields of psychology and medicine, with particular focus on psychiatry and mental health, clinical psychology, and philosophy. The scientist has contributed extensively to the study of schizophrenia, mental health and psychiatry, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, bipolar disorder and treatment, and mental health research topics.

The primary topics covered in their work include:

  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access

Frequent publication venues for their research are:

  • The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Schizophrenia
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry
  • World Psychiatry
  • Philosophical Psychology

Notable recent papers include:

  • The Lancet Psychiatry Commission on youth mental health (2024, The Lancet Psychiatry)
  • Subjective experience and meaning of delusions in psychosis: a systematic review and qualitative evidence synthesis (2022, The Lancet Psychiatry)
  • Antipsychotic medication versus psychological intervention versus a combination of both in adolescents with first-episode psychosis (MAPS): a multicentre, three-arm, randomised controlled pilot and feasibility study (2020, The Lancet Psychiatry)
  • Ultrafast Optoelectronic Processes in 1D Radial van der Waals Heterostructures: Carbon, Boron Nitride, and MoS2 Nanotubes with Coexisting Excitons and Highly Mobile Charges (2020, Nano Letters)
  • Accelerating Medicines Partnership® Schizophrenia (AMP® SCZ): Rationale and Study Design of the Largest Global Prospective Cohort Study of Clinical High Risk for Psychosis (2024, Schizophrenia Bulletin)

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Rachel Upthegrove
  • Daniel H. Mathalon
  • Jesús Pérez
  • Paolo Fusar-Poli
  • Eric Chen

Matthew R. Broome has also contributed to book publications, including work published by King's College London. One such book is Risk Factors for Psychosis: Paradigms, Mechanisms, and Prevention, released in 2020.

Best Publications

  • Regionally Localized Thinning of the Cerebral Cortex in Schizophrenia

    Gina R. Kuperberg;Matthew R. Broome;Philip K. McGuire;Anthony S. David

  • Elevated Striatal Dopamine Function Linked to Prodromal Signs of Schizophrenia

    Oliver D Howes;Andrew J Montgomery;Marie-Claude Asselin;Robin M Murray

  • Physical, cognitive, and mental health impacts of COVID-19 after hospitalisation (PHOSP-COVID): a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study.

    Rachael A Evans;Hamish McAuley;Ewen M Harrison;Aarti Shikotra

  • Neurofunctional correlates of vulnerability to psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Jorge Perez;Matthew Broome;Stefan Borgwardt

  • Abnormal Frontostriatal Interactions in People With Prodromal Signs of Psychosis: A Multimodal Imaging Study

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;Oliver D. Howes;Paul Allen;Matthew Broome

  • Delusion formation and reasoning biases in those at clinical high risk for psychosis.

    M R Broome;L C Johns;I Valli;J B Woolley

  • Cannabis Use and Mania Symptoms: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

    M. Gibbs;C. Winsper;S. Marwaha;E. Gilbert

  • What causes the onset of psychosis

    Matthew R. Broome;James B. Woolley;Paul Tabraham;Louise C. Johns

  • Superior temporal lobe dysfunction and frontotemporal dysconnectivity in subjects at risk of psychosis and in first-episode psychosis

    Nicolas Crossley;Andrea Mechelli;Paolo Fusar-Poli;Matthew Broome

  • Abnormal prefrontal activation directly related to pre-synaptic striatal dopamine dysfunction in people at clinical high risk for psychosis.

    Paolo Fusar-Poli;O. D. Howes;O. D. Howes;Paul Allen;Matthew Broome

  • Alterations in White Matter Evident Before the Onset of Psychosis

    Francesco Carletti;James B. Woolley;Sagnik Bhattacharyya;Rocio Perez-Iglesias

  • The Oxford Handbook of Phenomenological Psychopathology

    Giovanni Stanghellini;Matthew Broome;Anthony Vincent Fernandez;Paolo Fusar-Poli

  • Brain-Wide Analysis of Functional Connectivity in First-Episode and Chronic Stages of Schizophrenia

    Tao Li;Qiang Wang;Jie Zhang;Jie Zhang;Edmund T. Rolls

  • Outreach and support in south London (OASIS): implementation of a clinical service for prodromal psychosis and the at risk mental state.

    Matthew R. Broome;James B. Woolley;Louise C. Johns;Lucia R. Valmaggia

  • Functional integration between the posterior hippocampus and prefrontal cortex is impaired in both first episode schizophrenia and the at risk mental state

    Stefania Benetti;Andrea Mechelli;Marco Picchioni;Matthew R. Broome

  • Misattribution of external speech in patients with hallucinations and delusions.

    Paul P Allen;Louise C Johns;Cynthia H.Y Fu;Matthew R Broome

  • A systematic review of the parenting and outcomes experienced by offspring of mothers with borderline personality pathology: Potential mechanisms and clinical implications.

    Julie Eyden;Catherine Winsper;Dieter Wolke;Matthew R. Broome

  • Neural correlates of executive function and working memory in the ‘ at-risk mental state’

    Matthew R. Broome;Pall Matthiasson;Paolo Fusar-Poli;James B. Woolley

  • How is affective instability defined and measured? A systematic review

    Steven Marwaha;Zhimin He;Matthew Broome;Swaran Singh

  • Regionally localized thinning of the cerebral cortex in schizophrenia

    G.R. Kuperberg;M. Broome;P.K. McGuire;A.S. David

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip McGuire
Philip McGuire University of Oxford
Louise Johns
Louise Johns University of Oxford
Lucia Valmaggia
Lucia Valmaggia King's College London
Paolo Fusar-Poli
Paolo Fusar-Poli King's College London
Elvira Bramon
Elvira Bramon University College London
Paul Allen
Paul Allen Royal Holloway University of London
Oliver D. Howes
Oliver D. Howes King's College London
Daniel Freeman
Daniel Freeman University of Oxford
James M. Stone
James M. Stone Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Paul Bebbington
Paul Bebbington University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA unlocks a diverse array of online degree options and career trajectories. Many students are now looking for ways to earn respected credentials quickly and affordably while fitting study around work or life commitments.

Popular choices include cheap msw programs online that make graduate-level social work accessible to more students. Those aiming to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts may opt for bcba online programs, which are designed for flexibility and accreditation.

Accelerated learning options are also available to help you fast-track your degree. For example, you can consider a masters in social work online or a fast psychology degree to quickly enter rewarding fields like counseling, clinical psychology, or social services.

No matter your passion—social work, psychology, research, or behavioral analysis—online programs offer accessible and affordable entry points, making it easier to launch or advance your career in the Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew R. Broome

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles