World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
33
Citations
3835
World Ranking
12785
National Ranking
242

Jacques Terken publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacques Terken sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 146 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jacques Terken D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacques Terken sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jacques Terken is affiliated with Eindhoven University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans psychology, computer science, and engineering, with a focus on subfields such as social psychology, human-computer interaction, automotive engineering, safety, risk, reliability and quality, and mechanical engineering.

The scientist's work is centered around topics including human-automation interaction and safety, innovative human-technology interaction, traffic and road safety, autonomous vehicle technology and safety, persona design and applications, design education and practice, and usability and user interface design.

Among their recent published papers are:

  • "Taming the eHMI jungle: A classification taxonomy to guide, compare, and assess the design principles of automated vehicles' external human-machine interfaces" (2020, Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives)
  • "Communicating the intention of an automated vehicle to pedestrians: The contributions of eHMI and vehicle behavior" (2020, it - Information Technology)
  • "Toward Shared Control Between Automated Vehicles and Users" (2020, Automotive Innovation)
  • "Gaining Situation Awareness through a Vibrotactile Display to Mitigate Motion Sickness in Fully-Automated Driving Cars" (2020, International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering)
  • "Reading During Fully Automated Driving: A Study of the Effect of Peripheral Visual and Haptic Information on Situation Awareness and Mental Workload" (2022, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems)

Frequent coauthors contributing to their research include Fang Chen, Bastian Pfleging, Debargha Dey, Marieke Martens, and Nidzamuddin Md. Yusof.

Their research findings have been published in venues such as:

  • Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
  • it - Information Technology
  • Automotive Innovation
  • International Journal of Automotive and Mechanical Engineering
  • IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems

Jacques Terken has also contributed to book publications, including "Automotive Interaction Design" published by Springer Nature in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Taming the eHMI jungle: A classification taxonomy to guide, compare, and assess the design principles of automated vehicles' external human-machine interfaces

    Debargha (Dave) Dey;Azra Habibovic;Andreas Löcken;Philipp Wintersberger

  • Deaccentuation of words representing 'given' information : effects of persistence of grammatical function and surface position

    Jacques Terken;Julia Hirschberg

  • Pedestrian Interaction with Vehicles: Roles of Explicit and Implicit Communication

    Debargha Dey;Jacques Terken

  • Computers in the Human Interaction Loop

    Unknown

  • Enhancing trust in autonomous vehicles through intelligent user interfaces that mimic human behavior

    Peter A. M. Ruijten;Jacques M. B. Terken;Sanjeev N. Chandramouli

  • Question marking in Hungarian: timing and height of pitch peaks

    Mária Gósy;Jacques Terken

  • The effect of peripheral visual feedforward system in enhancing situation awareness and mitigating motion sickness in fully automated driving

    Juffrizal Karjanto;Juffrizal Karjanto;Nidzamuddin Md. Yusof;Nidzamuddin Md. Yusof;Chao Wang;Jacques Terken

  • Pedestrian road-crossing willingness as a function of vehicle automation, external appearance, and driving behaviour

    Debargha Dey;Marieke Martens;Berry Eggen;Jacques Terken

  • Co-constructing stories: a participatory design technique to elicit in-depth user feedback and suggestions about design concepts

    Derya Ozcelik Buskermolen;Jacques Terken

  • The Exploration of Autonomous Vehicle Driving Styles: Preferred Longitudinal, Lateral, and Vertical Accelerations

    Nidzamuddin Md. Yusof;Juffrizal Karjanto;Jacques Terken;Frank Delbressine

  • Anthropomorphizing information to enhance trust in autonomous vehicles

    Dongfang Niu;Jacques Terken;Berry Eggen

  • Interface Concepts for Intent Communication from Autonomous Vehicles to Vulnerable Road Users

    Debargha Dey;Marieke Martens;Chao Wang;Felix Ros

  • Prosodic predictors of discourse finality in spontaneous monologues

    Marc Swerts;René Collier;Jacques Terken

  • Gaze Patterns in Pedestrian Interaction with Vehicles: Towards Effective Design of External Human-Machine Interfaces for Automated Vehicles

    Debargha Dey;Francesco Walker;Marieke Martens;Jacques Terken

  • Beyond Sentence Prosody: Paragraph Intonation in Dutch

    Unknown

  • Influencing social dynamics in meetings through a peripheral display

    Janienke Sturm;Olga Houben-van Herwijnen;Anke Eyck;Jacques Terken

  • Prosodic realizations of global and local structure and rhetorical relations in read aloud news reports

    Hanny den Ouden;Leo Noordman;Jacques Terken

  • The relation between self-reported driving style and driving behaviour : a simulator study

    Hanneke Hooft van Huysduynen;Jacques Terken;Berry Eggen

  • User-centred design and evaluation of ubiquitous services

    Rahat Iqbal;Janienke Sturm;Olga Kulyk;Jimmy Wang

  • Identifying the intended addressee in mixed human-human and human-computer interaction from non-verbal features

    Koen van Turnhout;Jacques Terken;Ilse Bakx;Berry Eggen

  • The Impact of Vehicle Appearance and Vehicle Behavior on Pedestrian Interaction with Autonomous Vehicles

    Debargha Dey;Marieke Martens;Berry Eggen;Jacques Terken

  • Real-time feedback on nonverbal behaviour to enhance social dynamics in small group meetings

    Olga Anatoliyivna Kulyk;Jimmy Wang;Jacques Terken

  • Multimodal support for social dynamics in co-located meetings

    Jacques Terken;Janienke Sturm

Frequent Co-Authors

Berry Eggen
Berry Eggen Eindhoven University of Technology
Matthias Rauterberg
Matthias Rauterberg Eindhoven University of Technology
Marc Swerts
Marc Swerts Tilburg University
Jean-Bernard Martens
Jean-Bernard Martens Eindhoven University of Technology
Christian Müller
Christian Müller Freie Universität Berlin
Sriram Subramanian
Sriram Subramanian University College London
Julia Hirschberg
Julia Hirschberg Columbia University
Manfred Tscheligi
Manfred Tscheligi University of Salzburg
Massimo Zancanaro
Massimo Zancanaro University of Trento

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Computer Science opens up a wide range of study and career options. For those seeking quick entry into tech fields, short certificate programs that pay well can be an ideal starting point. These certifications are designed to boost hiring potential in less time and are especially suitable for career switchers or upskillers.

If you’re looking to advance your education rapidly, consider enrolling in one of the fastest masters degree online programs. These accelerated pathways let you earn a graduate degree in just one year, helping you get back into the workforce or climb the ladder faster.

For those considering long-term career prospects, it’s useful to explore which master's degree is most in demand in usa. Certain computer science-related master’s degrees continue to top the list for employer demand and salary growth across the country.

Not ready for a bachelor’s program? Starting with online associate degree programs can provide the foundational skills needed for many tech support roles and entry-level IT jobs, while still leaving the door open for transfer to a four-year degree in the future.

Best Scientists Citing Jacques Terken

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles