World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
66
Citations
12128
World Ranking
8875
National Ranking
3946

Thomas P. Shanley publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas P. Shanley sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 181 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Thomas P. Shanley D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas P. Shanley sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • In vivo suppression of NF-kappa B and preservation of I kappa B alpha by interleukin-10 and interleukin-13.

    Alex B. Lentsch;Thomas P. Shanley;Vidya Sarma;Peter A. Ward

  • Sublytic concentrations of the membrane attack complex of complement induce endothelial interleukin-8 and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 through nuclear factor-κB activation

    K S Kilgore;E Schmid;T P Shanley;C M Flory

  • New concepts of IL-10-induced lung fibrosis: fibrocyte recruitment and M2 activation in a CCL2/CCR2 axis.

    Lei Sun;Marisa C. Louie;Kevin M. Vannella;Carol A. Wilke

  • IL-17–Induced Pulmonary Pathogenesis during Respiratory Viral Infection and Exacerbation of Allergic Disease

    Sumanta Mukherjee;Dennis M. Lindell;Aaron A. Berlin;Susan B. Morris

  • Genome-level expression profiles in pediatric septic shock indicate a role for altered zinc homeostasis in poor outcome

    Hector R. Wong;Thomas P. Shanley;Bhuvaneswari Sakthivel;Natalie Cvijanovich

  • Identification of pediatric septic shock subclasses based on genome-wide expression profiling.

    Hector R. Wong;Natalie Z Cvijanovich;Richard Lin;Geoffrey L. Allen

  • Tristetraprolin (TTP)-14-3-3 Complex Formation Protects TTP from Dephosphorylation by Protein Phosphatase 2a and Stabilizes Tumor Necrosis Factor-α mRNA

    Lei Sun;Georg Stoecklin;Susan Van Way;Vania Hinkovska-Galcheva

  • Requirement for C-X-C chemokines (macrophage inflammatory protein-2 and cytokine-induced neutrophil chemoattractant) in IgG immune complex-induced lung injury

    Thomas P. Shanley;Hagen Schmal;Hagen Schmal;Roscoe L. Warner;Elisabeth Schmid;Elisabeth Schmid

  • Genomic expression profiling across the pediatric systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, and septic shock spectrum*

    Hector R. Wong;Natalie Cvijanovich;Geoffrey L. Allen;Richard Lin

  • Role for macrophage inflammatory protein-2 in lipopolysaccharide-induced lung injury in rats.

    Hagen Schmal;Thomas P. Shanley;Michael L. Jones;Hans Peter Friedl

  • Suppression of macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)‐1α production and collagen‐induced arthritis by adenosine receptor agonists

    Csaba Szabó;Gwen S Scott;László Virág;Greg Egnaczyk

  • The pediatric sepsis biomarker risk model.

    Hector R. Wong;Hector R. Wong;Shelia Salisbury;Qiang Xiao;Natalie Z Cvijanovich

  • Combined steroid treatment for congenital heart surgery improves oxygen delivery and reduces postbypass inflammatory mediator expression.

    Valerie A. Schroeder;Jeffery M. Pearl;Steven M. Schwartz;Thomas P. Shanley

  • The serine/threonine phosphatase, PP2A: endogenous regulator of inflammatory cell signaling.

    Thomas P. Shanley;Niti Vasi;Alvin Denenberg;Hector R. Wong

  • Role of macrophage inflammatory protein-1 alpha (MIP-1 alpha) in acute lung injury in rats.

    T P Shanley;H Schmal;H P Friedl;M L Jones

  • Extracellular heat shock protein-70 induces endotoxin tolerance in THP-1 cells.

    Rajesh Aneja;Kelli Odoms;Katherine Dunsmore;Thomas P. Shanley

  • Usefulness of Corticosteroid Therapy in Decreasing Epinephrine Requirements in Critically Ill Infants With Congenital Heart Disease

    Shirah Shore;David P Nelson;Jeffrey M Pearl;Peter B Manning

  • Glomerular inflammation induces resistance to tubular injury in the rat. A novel form of acquired, heme oxygenase-dependent resistance to renal injury.

    Beth A. Vogt;Thomas P. Shanley;Anthony Croatt;Jawed Alam

  • Role of CC Chemokines (Macrophage Inflammatory Protein-1β, Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein-1, RANTES) in Acute Lung Injury in Rats

    Nicolas M. Bless;Markus Huber-Lang;Markus Huber-Lang;Ren Feng Guo;Roscoe L. Warner

  • Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Models of Macrophage-Dependent Acute Lung Injury Evidence for Alveolar Macrophage as Source of Proteinases

    Douglas F. Gibbs;Thomas P. Shanley;Roscoe L. Warner;Hedwig S. Murphy

Frequent Co-Authors

Hector R. Wong
Hector R. Wong Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Peter A. Ward
Peter A. Ward University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Richard Holubkov
Richard Holubkov University of Utah
Joseph A. Carcillo
Joseph A. Carcillo University of Pittsburgh
Robert A. Berg
Robert A. Berg Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
David L. Wessel
David L. Wessel George Washington University
Kent J. Johnson
Kent J. Johnson University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Matthew M. Davis
Matthew M. Davis Northwestern University
Katsuo Kurabayashi
Katsuo Kurabayashi New York University
James G. Gurney
James G. Gurney University of Memphis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a broad range of online degrees and professional paths in healthcare and life sciences. Many students advance from foundational science studies into specialized roles focused on patient care, health management, or wellness.

If you’re interested in direct patient care, pursuing an rn to bsn can help registered nurses expand their skills and career options. Those aiming for leadership roles in healthcare might look into the masters degree in healthcare management to quickly gain advanced management expertise.

Students passionate about mental health can consider pmhnp programs, which prepare nurses to address the increasing demand for psychiatric care. For those with an interest in preventive care and nutrition, an online nutrition degree can lead to roles in public health, food science, and dietary consulting.

Exploring these online programs lets you tailor your academic journey to match your interests and emerging opportunities in science and healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas P. Shanley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles