World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
45
Citations
6563
World Ranking
5610
National Ranking
177

Gerardo M. Verderame publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerardo M. Verderame sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 203 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Gerardo M. Verderame D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerardo M. Verderame sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gerardo M. Verderame is affiliated with the University of Naples Federico II in Italy and specializes in engineering with a particular focus on civil and structural engineering. Their research spans several subfields including building and construction, mechanical engineering, earth-surface processes, and archeology.

Their main research topics include:

  • Seismic Performance and Analysis
  • Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
  • Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete
  • Structural Health Monitoring Techniques
  • Structural Response to Dynamic Loads
  • Seismic and Structural Analysis of Tall Buildings
  • Structural Analysis of Composite Materials

Verderame has been published frequently in several venues with a focus on earthquake engineering and structural integrity. Key publication venues include:

  • Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
  • COMPDYN Proceedings
  • Journal of Earthquake Engineering
  • Procedia Structural Integrity
  • Engineering Structures

Notable recent publications include:

  • "Seismic risk assessment of residential buildings in Italy," 2020, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
  • "Empirical fragility curves for Italian residential RC buildings," 2020, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering
  • "Experimental analysis of strengthening solutions for the out-of-plane collapse of masonry infills in RC structures through textile reinforced mortars," 2020, Engineering Structures
  • "Empirical prediction of the in-plane/out-of-plane interaction effects in clay brick unreinforced masonry infill walls," 2020, Engineering Structures
  • "Modelling and Seismic Response Analysis of Italian Pre-Code and Low-Code Reinforced Concrete Buildings. Part I: Bare Frames," 2022, Journal of Earthquake Engineering

Throughout their career, Verderame has collaborated frequently with other researchers in their field. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Paolo Ricci
  • Carlo Del Gaudio
  • Mariano Di Domenico
  • Maria Teresa De Risi
  • Santa Anna Scala

Best Publications

  • 6th April 2009 L’Aquila earthquake, Italy: reinforced concrete building performance

    Paolo Ricci;Flavia De Luca;Gerardo Mario Verderame

  • Seismic risk assessment of residential buildings in Italy

    Mauro Dolce;Andrea Prota;Barbara Borzi;Francesca da Porto

  • Empirical fragility curves from damage data on RC buildings after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake

    Carlo Del Gaudio;Giuseppina De Martino;Marco Di Ludovico;Gaetano Manfredi

  • The structural role played by masonry infills on RC building performances after the 2011 Lorca, Spain, earthquake

    Flavia De Luca;Gerardo M. Verderame;Fernando Gómez-Martínez;Agustín Pérez-García

  • Preliminary analysis of a soft‐storey mechanism after the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake

    Gerardo M. Verderame;Flavia De Luca;Paolo Ricci;Gaetano Manfredi

  • Empirical fragility curves for Italian residential RC buildings

    A. Rosti;C. Del Gaudio;M. Rota;P. Ricci

  • Experimental assessment of the in-plane/out-of-plane interaction in unreinforced masonry infill walls

    Paolo Ricci;Mariano Di Domenico;Gerardo M. Verderame

  • Seismic response of r.c. columns with smooth reinforcement. Part I: Monotonic tests

    Gerardo Mario Verderame;Giovanni Fabbrocino;Gaetano Manfredi

  • Cyclic bond behaviour of plain bars. Part II: Analytical investigation

    Gerardo M. Verderame;Giovanni De Carlo;Paolo Ricci;Giovanni Fabbrocino

  • Cyclic bond behaviour of plain bars. Part I: Experimental investigation

    Gerardo M. Verderame;Paolo Ricci;Giovanni De Carlo;Gaetano Manfredi

  • In-plane behaviour and damage assessment of masonry infills with hollow clay bricks in RC frames

    Maria Teresa De Risi;Carlo Del Gaudio;Paolo Ricci;Gerardo Mario Verderame

  • Study of the seismic behavior of external RC beam–column joints through experimental tests and numerical simulations

    Angelo Masi;Giuseppe Santarsiero;Gian Piero Lignola;Gerardo M. Verderame

  • Analytical investigation of elastic period of infilled RC MRF buildings

    Paolo Ricci;Gerardo Mario Verderame;Gaetano Manfredi

  • A simulated design procedure for the assessment of seismic capacity of existing reinforced concrete buildings

    G. M. Verderame;M. Polese;C. Mariniello;G. Manfredi

  • Seismic response of RC buildings during the M w 6.0 August 24, 2016 Central Italy earthquake: the Amatrice case study

    A. Masi;L. Chiauzzi;G. Santarsiero;V. Manfredi

  • Development and urban-scale application of a simplified method for seismic fragility assessment of RC buildings

    C. Del Gaudio;P. Ricci;G.M. Verderame;G. Manfredi

  • Empirical‐based out‐of‐plane URM infill wall model accounting for the interaction with in‐plane demand

    Paolo Ricci;Mariano Di Domenico;Gerardo M. Verderame

  • Empirical fragility curves for masonry buildings after the 2009 L’Aquila, Italy, earthquake

    Carlo Del Gaudio;Giuseppina De Martino;Marco Di Ludovico;Gaetano Manfredi

  • A MULTILEVEL APPROACH TO THE CAPACITY ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING RC BUILDINGS

    Edoardo Cosenza;Gaetano Manfredi;Maria Polese;Gerardo M. Verderame

  • Experimental investigation on the influence of the aspect ratio on the in-plane/out-of-plane interaction for masonry infills in RC frames

    Maria Teresa De Risi;Mariano Di Domenico;Paolo Ricci;Gerardo Mario Verderame

  • Vulnerability Analysis for Gravity Load Designed RC Buildings in Naples – Italy

    Maria Polese;Gerardo Mario Verderame;Cristiano Mariniello;Iunio Iervolino

Frequent Co-Authors

Gaetano Manfredi
Gaetano Manfredi University of Naples Federico II
Andrea Prota
Andrea Prota University of Naples Federico II
Edoardo Cosenza
Edoardo Cosenza University of Naples Federico II
Marco Di Ludovico
Marco Di Ludovico University of Naples Federico II
Enrico Spacone
Enrico Spacone University of Chieti-Pescara
Iunio Iervolino
Iunio Iervolino University of Naples Federico II
Andrea Penna
Andrea Penna University of Pavia
Humberto Varum
Humberto Varum University of Porto
Enzo Martinelli
Enzo Martinelli University of Salerno
Hugo Rodrigues
Hugo Rodrigues University of Aveiro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Engineering and Technology in the USA opens the door to many alternative and complementary career paths through further education. Advanced management roles are increasingly accessible with options like the accelerated mba, which allows professionals to gain business and leadership skills in a time-efficient manner.

For students interested in law and technology applications, online paralegal programs offer a flexible way to expand your skill set into the legal sector, an area closely linked to intellectual property and compliance in engineering fields.

Developing practical business skills can also improve employability and management capability. Earning a bookkeeper certification can equip you with essential financial knowledge relevant to tech startups and engineering firms.

Lastly, office administration degrees help you gain foundational business operations expertise, which can be valuable in technical environments and enhance opportunities for administrative or managerial advancement.

Best Scientists Citing Gerardo M. Verderame

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles