World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
54
Citations
13973
World Ranking
15446
National Ranking
6445

Richard M. Bostock publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Bostock sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 139 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Richard M. Bostock D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Bostock sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Phytopathological Society
  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Richard M. Bostock is affiliated with the University of California, Davis, in the United States. Their research primarily spans Agricultural and Biological Sciences with a focus on Plant Science, Cell Biology, Ecology, Insect Science, and Oceanography as subfields.

Their work covers several main topics, including:

  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
  • Plant Pathogens and Resistance
  • Forest Insect Ecology and Management
  • Insect and Pesticide Research
  • Plant Growth Enhancement Techniques
  • Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Bostock include:

  • Tatiana V. Roubtsova
  • Jackson P. Audley
  • Steven J. Seybold
  • Domonique C. Lewis
  • Holly Little

Bostock's publications appear regularly in several journals, with the most common venues being:

  • Phytopathology
  • Nematology
  • Journal of Economic Entomology
  • Agricultural and Forest Entomology
  • Plant Disease

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Bostock include:

  • New and Interesting Fungi. 3, 2020, Fungal Systematics and Evolution
  • Eicosapolyenoic fatty acids induce defense responses and resistance to Phytophthora capsici in tomato and pepper, 2021, Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology
  • Trap Assays of the Walnut Twig Beetle, Pityophthorus juglandis Blackman (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), Reveal an Effective Semiochemical Repellent Combination, 2020, Journal of Chemical Ecology
  • Polyketide Synthase Gene Expression in Relation to Chloromonilicin and Melanin Production in Monilinia fructicola, 2020, Phytopathology
  • DNA barcoding, phylogeny and phylogeography of the cyst nematode species of the Humuli group from the genus Heterodera (Tylenchida: Heteroderidae), 2022, Nematology

Richard M. Bostock has been recognized with awards including:

  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2012
  • Fellow of the American Phytopathological Society, 2012

Best Publications

  • Rapid In Situ Assay for Indoleacetic Acid Production by Bacteria Immobilized on a Nitrocellulose Membrane

    John M. Bric;Richard M. Bostock;Sara E. Silverstone

  • APOPTOSIS : A FUNCTIONAL PARADIGM FOR PROGRAMMED PLANT CELL DEATH INDUCED BY A HOST-SELECTIVE PHYTOTOXIN AND INVOKED DURING DEVELOPMENT

    Hong Wang;Juan Li;Richard M. Bostock;David G. Gilchrist

  • Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR) Against Pathogens in the Context of Induced Plant Defences

    Martin Heil;Richard M. Bostock

  • Signal crosstalk and induced resistance: straddling the line between cost and benefit.

    Richard M Bostock

  • Phylogenetics and taxonomy of the fungal vascular wilt pathogen Verticillium, with the descriptions of five new species.

    Patrik Inderbitzin;Richard M. Bostock;R. Michael Davis;Toshiyuki Usami

  • Eicosapentaenoic and Arachidonic Acids from Phytophthora infestans Elicit Fungitoxic Sesquiterpenes in the Potato.

    Richard M. Bostock;Joseph A. Kuc;Roger A. Laine

  • Trade-Offs in Plant Defense Against Pathogens and Herbivores: A Field Demonstration of Chemical Elicitors of Induced Resistance

    Jennifer S. Thaler;Ana L. Fidantsef;Sean S. Duffey;Richard M. Bostock

  • Signal interactions in pathogen and insect attack: Systemic plant-mediated interactions between pathogens and herbivores of the tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum

    M.J. Stout;A.L. Fidantsef;S.S. Duffey;R.M. Bostock

  • Differential induction and suppression of potato 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase genes in response to Phytophthora infestans and to its elicitor arachidonic acid.

    Doil Choi;Bernard L. Ward;Richard M. Bostock

  • INTERACTIONS BETWEEN ABSCISIC-ACID-MEDIATED RESPONSES AND PLANT RESISTANCE TO PATHOGENS AND INSECTS

    Jennifer S. Thaler;Richard M. Bostock

  • Lipid-derived signals that discriminate wound- and pathogen-responsive isoprenoid pathways in plants: methyl jasmonate and the fungal elicitor arachidonic acid induce different 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase genes and antimicrobial isoprenoids in Solanum tuberosum L.

    Doil Choi;Richard M. Bostock;Sergei Avdiushko;David F. Hildebrand

  • Signal interactions in pathogen and insect attack: expression of lipoxygenase, proteinase inhibitor II, and pathogenesis-related protein P4 in the tomato,Lycopersicon esculentum

    A.L. Fidantsef;M.J. Stout;J.S. Thaler;S.S. Duffey

  • Specificity of induced resistance in the tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum

    Michael J. Stout;Kathi V. Workman;Richard M. Bostock;Sean S. Duffey

  • Cross-talk between jasmonate and salicylate plant defense pathways: effects on several plant parasites

    Jennifer S. Thaler;Richard Karban;Diane E. Ullman;Karina Boege

  • In situ isolation of mRNA from individual plant cells: creation of cell-specific cDNA libraries.

    Erik E. Karrer;James E. Lincoln;Saskia Hogenhout;Alan B. Bennett

  • Predisposition in Plant Disease: Exploiting the Nexus in Abiotic and Biotic Stress Perception and Response

    Richard M. Bostock;Matthew F. Pye;Tatiana V. Roubtsova

  • Expression of the antiapoptotic baculovirus p35 gene in tomato blocks programmed cell death and provides broad-spectrum resistance to disease

    James E. Lincoln;Craig Richael;Bert Overduin;Kathy Smith

  • The Ascomycete Verticillium longisporum Is a Hybrid and a Plant Pathogen with an Expanded Host Range

    Patrik Inderbitzin;R. Michael Davis;Richard M. Bostock;Krishna V. Subbarao

  • Arachidonic acid: an evolutionarily conserved signaling molecule modulates plant stress signaling networks

    Tatyana Savchenko;Justin W. Walley;Justin W. Walley;E. Wassim Chehab;Yanmei Xiao

  • Signal conflicts and synergies in induced resistance to multiple attackers

    R.M. Bostock

Frequent Co-Authors

David G. Gilchrist
David G. Gilchrist University of California, Davis
Themis J. Michailides
Themis J. Michailides University of California, Davis
Jennifer S. Thaler
Jennifer S. Thaler Cornell University
Steven J. Seybold
Steven J. Seybold US Forest Service
Krishna V. Subbarao
Krishna V. Subbarao University of California, Davis
Sean S. Duffey
Sean S. Duffey University of California, Davis
Katayoon Dehesh
Katayoon Dehesh University of California, Riverside
David M. Rizzo
David M. Rizzo University of California, Davis
Thomas M. Gradziel
Thomas M. Gradziel University of California, Davis
Doil Choi
Doil Choi Seoul National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens the door to a range of related online programs and career options in the health sciences. Many students expand their career potential by pursuing specialized online degrees that are both flexible and affordable.

If you are interested in nutrition or dietetics, consider the cheapest online master's in nutrition or learn more about the best dietetics masters programs available. These paths equip graduates with expert knowledge for roles in health education, clinical settings, and food science.

For those looking to work in diagnostic healthcare, online options for medical imaging are growing. Explore ultrasound tech programs online to gain skills in sonography, or discover flexible online radiology programs to prepare for careers in radiologic technology.

These online pathways provide practical experience and credentials, making it easier to start or advance a science-based career from anywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Richard M. Bostock

Trending Scientists