What is she best known for?
The fields of study she is best known for:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Prunus, Genetics, Microsatellite, Germplasm and Prunus cerasus.
Her work in Prunus covers topics such as Genomics which are related to areas like Malus and Fragaria.
As a part of the same scientific family, Amy F. Iezzoni mostly works in the field of Genetics, focusing on Pollen and, on occasion, Polyploid.
Her studies deal with areas such as Genetic marker and Botany as well as Microsatellite.
As a part of the same scientific study, Amy F. Iezzoni usually deals with the Germplasm, concentrating on Genetic diversity and frequently concerns with Prunus serotina, DNA sequencing and Chloroplast DNA.
The concepts of her Prunus cerasus study are interwoven with issues in Hybrid and Loss of heterozygosity.
Her most cited work include:
- Multiple Models for Rosaceae Genomics (228 citations)
- Genome-wide SNP detection, validation, and development of an 8K SNP array for apple. (215 citations)
- The S haplotype‐specific F‐box protein gene, SFB, is defective in self‐compatible haplotypes of Prunus avium and P. mume (202 citations)
What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?
Amy F. Iezzoni focuses on Prunus, Botany, Horticulture, Genetics and Cultivar.
Her Prunus research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Malus, Quantitative trait locus, Prunus cerasus, Allele and Ploidy.
Amy F. Iezzoni interconnects Pollen, Polyploid and Hybrid in the investigation of issues within Prunus cerasus.
Her work is dedicated to discovering how Botany, Microsatellite are connected with Genetic marker and other disciplines.
Her study in Genetics concentrates on Genome, Single-nucleotide polymorphism, Haplotype, Gene and SNP array.
Amy F. Iezzoni has researched Cultivar in several fields, including Plant disease resistance, Germplasm and Genotype.
She most often published in these fields:
- Prunus (36.62%)
- Botany (31.69%)
- Horticulture (30.28%)
What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Horticulture (30.28%)
- Quantitative trait locus (14.08%)
- Genetics (26.76%)
In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:
Her primary areas of investigation include Horticulture, Quantitative trait locus, Genetics, Cultivar and Prunus.
Her work focuses on many connections between Horticulture and other disciplines, such as Heritability, that overlap with her field of interest in Genetic model, Epistasis, Genetic gain and Genetic variation.
Her Quantitative trait locus study combines topics in areas such as Allele, Haplotype and Candidate gene.
Her study focuses on the intersection of Haplotype and fields such as Linkage with connections in the field of Genomics.
Her Genetics study frequently involves adjacent topics like Malus.
Amy F. Iezzoni undertakes multidisciplinary investigations into Prunus and Vascular cambium in her work.
Between 2017 and 2021, her most popular works were:
- Prunus genetics and applications after de novo genome sequencing: achievements and prospects. (42 citations)
- High-quality, genome-wide SNP genotypic data for pedigreed germplasm of the diploid outbreeding species apple, peach, and sweet cherry through a common workflow (33 citations)
- Genomic heritability estimates in sweet cherry reveal non-additive genetic variance is relevant for industry-prioritized traits (14 citations)
In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Her scientific interests lie mostly in Genetics, Prunus, Germplasm, Quantitative trait locus and Genomics.
Her research combines Pollen and Genetics.
The various areas that she examines in her Prunus study include Genetic analysis, Inbreeding, Inbreeding depression, Genetic marker and Synteny.
The Quantitative trait locus study combines topics in areas such as Allele and Horticulture.
Her Sour cherry and Prunus cerasus study in the realm of Horticulture connects with subjects such as Trait.
In her study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Genomics, Outbreeding depression is strongly linked to SNP.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
