World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
53
Citations
9155
World Ranking
1826
National Ranking
477

Amy F. Iezzoni publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy F. Iezzoni sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 184 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Amy F. Iezzoni D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy F. Iezzoni sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is she best known for?

The fields of study she is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Genetics
  • Botany

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Prunus, Genetics, Microsatellite, Germplasm and Prunus cerasus. Her work in Prunus covers topics such as Genomics which are related to areas like Malus and Fragaria. As a part of the same scientific family, Amy F. Iezzoni mostly works in the field of Genetics, focusing on Pollen and, on occasion, Polyploid.

Her studies deal with areas such as Genetic marker and Botany as well as Microsatellite. As a part of the same scientific study, Amy F. Iezzoni usually deals with the Germplasm, concentrating on Genetic diversity and frequently concerns with Prunus serotina, DNA sequencing and Chloroplast DNA. The concepts of her Prunus cerasus study are interwoven with issues in Hybrid and Loss of heterozygosity.

Her most cited work include:

  • Multiple Models for Rosaceae Genomics (228 citations)
  • Genome-wide SNP detection, validation, and development of an 8K SNP array for apple. (215 citations)
  • The S haplotype‐specific F‐box protein gene, SFB, is defective in self‐compatible haplotypes of Prunus avium and P. mume (202 citations)

What are the main themes of her work throughout her whole career to date?

Amy F. Iezzoni focuses on Prunus, Botany, Horticulture, Genetics and Cultivar. Her Prunus research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Malus, Quantitative trait locus, Prunus cerasus, Allele and Ploidy. Amy F. Iezzoni interconnects Pollen, Polyploid and Hybrid in the investigation of issues within Prunus cerasus.

Her work is dedicated to discovering how Botany, Microsatellite are connected with Genetic marker and other disciplines. Her study in Genetics concentrates on Genome, Single-nucleotide polymorphism, Haplotype, Gene and SNP array. Amy F. Iezzoni has researched Cultivar in several fields, including Plant disease resistance, Germplasm and Genotype.

She most often published in these fields:

  • Prunus (36.62%)
  • Botany (31.69%)
  • Horticulture (30.28%)

What were the highlights of her more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Horticulture (30.28%)
  • Quantitative trait locus (14.08%)
  • Genetics (26.76%)

In recent papers she was focusing on the following fields of study:

Her primary areas of investigation include Horticulture, Quantitative trait locus, Genetics, Cultivar and Prunus. Her work focuses on many connections between Horticulture and other disciplines, such as Heritability, that overlap with her field of interest in Genetic model, Epistasis, Genetic gain and Genetic variation. Her Quantitative trait locus study combines topics in areas such as Allele, Haplotype and Candidate gene.

Her study focuses on the intersection of Haplotype and fields such as Linkage with connections in the field of Genomics. Her Genetics study frequently involves adjacent topics like Malus. Amy F. Iezzoni undertakes multidisciplinary investigations into Prunus and Vascular cambium in her work.

Between 2017 and 2021, her most popular works were:

  • Prunus genetics and applications after de novo genome sequencing: achievements and prospects. (42 citations)
  • High-quality, genome-wide SNP genotypic data for pedigreed germplasm of the diploid outbreeding species apple, peach, and sweet cherry through a common workflow (33 citations)
  • Genomic heritability estimates in sweet cherry reveal non-additive genetic variance is relevant for industry-prioritized traits (14 citations)

In her most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Genetics
  • Botany

Her scientific interests lie mostly in Genetics, Prunus, Germplasm, Quantitative trait locus and Genomics. Her research combines Pollen and Genetics. The various areas that she examines in her Prunus study include Genetic analysis, Inbreeding, Inbreeding depression, Genetic marker and Synteny.

The Quantitative trait locus study combines topics in areas such as Allele and Horticulture. Her Sour cherry and Prunus cerasus study in the realm of Horticulture connects with subjects such as Trait. In her study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Genomics, Outbreeding depression is strongly linked to SNP.

Best Publications

  • Multiple Models for Rosaceae Genomics

    Vladimir Shulaev;Schuyler S. Korban;Bryon Sosinski;Albert G. Abbott

  • Genome-wide SNP detection, validation, and development of an 8K SNP array for apple.

    David Chagné;Ross N. Crowhurst;Michela Troggio;Mark W. Davey

  • A SET OF SIMPLE-SEQUENCE REPEAT (SSR) MARKERS COVERING THE PRUNUS GENOME

    Maria José Aranzana;A Pineda;P Cosson;E Dirlewanger

  • The S haplotype‐specific F‐box protein gene, SFB, is defective in self‐compatible haplotypes of Prunus avium and P. mume

    Koichiro Ushijima;Hisayo Yamane;Akiko Watari;Eiko Kakehi

  • Development and evaluation of a 9K SNP array for peach by internationally coordinated SNP detection and validation in breeding germplasm.

    Ignazio Verde;Nahla Bassil;Simone Scalabrin;Barbara Gilmore

  • DNA Fingerprinting of Tetraploid Cherry Germplasm Using Simple Sequence Repeats

    Claudio Cantini;Amy F. Iezzoni;Warren F. Lamboy;Manuela Boritzki

  • Polymorphic DNA Markers in Black Cherry (Prunus serotina) Are Identified Using Sequences from Sweet Cherry, Peach, and Sour Cherry

    Suzanne L. Downey;Amy F. Iezzoni

  • Development and preliminary evaluation of a 90 K Axiom® SNP array for the allo-octoploid cultivated strawberry Fragaria × ananassa

    Nahla V Bassil;Thomas M Davis;Hailong Zhang;Stephen Ficklin

  • Primary structural features of the S haplotype-specific F-box protein, SFB, in Prunus

    Kazuo Ikeda;Boris Igic;Koichiro Ushijima;Hisayo Yamane

  • The S-RNase-based gametophytic self-incompatibility system in Prunus exhibits distinct genetic and molecular features

    Ryutaro Tao;Amy F. Iezzoni

  • Accumulation of Nonfunctional S-Haplotypes Results in the Breakdown of Gametophytic Self-Incompatibility in Tetraploid Prunus

    Nathanael R. Hauck;Hisayo Yamane;Ryutaro Tao;Amy F. Iezzoni

  • Development and evaluation of a genome-wide 6K SNP array for diploid sweet cherry and tetraploid sour cherry

    Cameron Peace;Nahla Bassil;Dorrie Main;Stephen Ficklin

  • CBF1 Orthologs in Sour Cherry and Strawberry and the Heterologous Expression of CBF1 in Strawberry

    Christopher L. Owens;Michael F. Thomashow;James F. Hancock;Amy F. Iezzoni

  • Prunus genetics and applications after de novo genome sequencing: achievements and prospects.

    Maria José Aranzana;Véronique Decroocq;Elisabeth Dirlewanger;Iban Eduardo

  • Fruit size QTL analysis of an F1 population derived from a cross between a domesticated sweet cherry cultivar and a wild forest sweet cherry

    Guorong Zhang;Audrey M. Sebolt;Suneth S. Sooriyapathirana;Dechun Wang

  • Genotypic Differences in Sweet Cherry Fruit Size are Primarily a Function of Cell Number

    James W. Olmstead;Amy F. Iezzoni;Matthew D. Whiting

  • Cell number regulator genes in Prunus provide candidate genes for the control of fruit size in sweet and sour cherry

    P. De Franceschi;T. Stegmeir;A. Cabrera;E. van der Knaap

  • QTL analysis of flower and fruit traits in sour cherry

    D. Wang;R. Karle;A. F. Iezzoni

  • Quantification and characterization of anthocyanins in Balaton Tart cherries

    H. Wang;M. G. Nair;A. F. Iezzoni;G. M. Strasburg

  • Molecular characterization of three non-functional S-haplotypes in sour cherry (Prunus cerasus).

    Tatsuya Tsukamoto;Nathanael R. Hauck;Ryutaro Tao;Ning Jiang

  • Identification and Characterization of S-RNases in Tetraploid Sour Cherry (Prunus cerasus)

    Hisayo Yamane;Ryutaro Tao;Akira Sugiura;Nathanael R. Hauck

  • Characteristics and transferability of new apple EST-derived SSRs to other Rosaceae species

    Ksenija Gasic;Ksenija Gasic;Yuepeng Han;Yuepeng Han;Sunee Kertbundit;Vladimir Shulaev

  • Self‐incompatibility (S) locus region of the mutated S6‐haplotype of sour cherry (Prunus cerasus) contains a functional pollen S allele and a non‐functional pistil S allele

    Hisayo Yamane;Kazuo Ikeda;Nathanael R. Hauck;Amy F. Iezzoni

  • QTL analysis and candidate gene mapping for skin and flesh color in sweet cherry fruit (Prunus avium L.)

    Suneth S. Sooriyapathirana;Amjad Khan;Audrey M. Sebolt;Dechun Wang

  • Self-compatibility and incompatibility in tetraploid sour cherry (Prunus cerasus L.)

    Nathanael R. Hauck;Hisayo Yamane;Ryutaro Tao;Amy F. Iezzoni

Frequent Co-Authors

Ryutaro Tao
Ryutaro Tao Kyoto University
Nahla V. Bassil
Nahla V. Bassil Agricultural Research Service
Ksenija Gasic
Ksenija Gasic Clemson University
James J. Luby
James J. Luby University of Minnesota
Hisayo Yamane
Hisayo Yamane Kyoto University
Elisabeth Dirlewanger
Elisabeth Dirlewanger INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Pere Arús
Pere Arús Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology
Dechun Wang
Dechun Wang Michigan State University
Chad E. Finn
Chad E. Finn Agricultural Research Service
Eric van de Weg
Eric van de Weg Wageningen University & Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Amy F. Iezzoni

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles