World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
51
Citations
8924
World Ranking
2034
National Ranking
531

Nahla V. Bassil publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nahla V. Bassil sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 228 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Nahla V. Bassil D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nahla V. Bassil sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The genome of woodland strawberry ( Fragaria vesca )

    Vladimir Shulaev;Daniel J. Sargent;Ross N. Crowhurst;Todd C. Mockler

  • Genome-wide SNP detection, validation, and development of an 8K SNP array for apple.

    David Chagné;Ross N. Crowhurst;Michela Troggio;Mark W. Davey

  • Development and evaluation of a 9K SNP array for peach by internationally coordinated SNP detection and validation in breeding germplasm.

    Ignazio Verde;Nahla Bassil;Simone Scalabrin;Barbara Gilmore

  • Development and preliminary evaluation of a 90 K Axiom® SNP array for the allo-octoploid cultivated strawberry Fragaria × ananassa

    Nahla V Bassil;Thomas M Davis;Hailong Zhang;Stephen Ficklin

  • Saturated linkage map construction in Rubus idaeus using genotyping by sequencing and genome-independent imputation

    Judson A Ward;Jasbir Bhangoo;Felicidad Fernández-Fernández;Patrick Moore

  • An enhanced microsatellite map of diploid Fragaria

    D. J. Sargent;D. J. Sargent;J. Clarke;D. W. Simpson;K. R. Tobutt

  • Insights into phylogeny, sex function and age of Fragaria based on whole chloroplast genome sequencing

    Wambui Njuguna;Aaron Liston;Richard Cronn;Tia-Lynn Ashman

  • Characterization of European hazelnut (Corylus avellana) cultivars using SSR markers

    Tufan Gökirmak;Tufan Gökirmak;Shawn A. Mehlenbacher;Nahla V. Bassil

  • Partial Purification of a cis-trans-Isomerase of Zeatin from Immature Seed of Phaseolus vulgaris L

    Nahla V. Bassil;David W. S. Mok;Machteld C. Mok

  • Development and evaluation of a genome-wide 6K SNP array for diploid sweet cherry and tetraploid sour cherry

    Cameron Peace;Nahla Bassil;Dorrie Main;Stephen Ficklin

  • Generation and analysis of blueberry transcriptome sequences from leaves, developing fruit, and flower buds from cold acclimation through deacclimation

    Lisa J Rowland;Nadim Alkharouf;Omar Darwish;Elizabeth L Ogden

  • A genetic linkage map for hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) based on RAPD and SSR markers.

    Shawn A. M Mehlenbacher;Rebecca N. Brown;Eduardo Ramon Nouhra;Tufan Gokirmak

  • Microsatellite markers in hazelnut : Isolation, characterization, and cross-species amplification

    Nahla V. Bassil;R. Botta;S.A. Mehlenbacher

  • The genome of black raspberry (Rubus occidentalis)

    Robert VanBuren;Doug Bryant;Jill M. Bushakra;Kelly J. Vining

  • Strawberry GenBank-derived and Genomic Simple Sequence Repeat (SSR) Markers and Their Utility with Strawberry, Blackberry, and Red and Black Raspberry

    K.S. Lewers;S.M.N. Styan;S.C. Hokanson;N.V. Bassil

  • Pseudo-chromosome-length genome assembly of a double haploid "Bartlett" pear (Pyrus communis L.)

    Gareth Linsmith;Stephane Rombauts;Sara Montanari;Cecilia H Deng

  • Microsatellite markers for Vaccinium from EST and genomic libraries

    P. S. Boches;N. V. Bassil;L. J. Rowland

  • Characterization and evaluation of microsatellite loci in European hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) and their transferability to other Corylus species

    P. Boccacci;A. Akkak;N. V. Bassil;S. A. Mehlenbacher

  • RosBREED: Enabling marker-assisted breeding in Rosaceae

    A. Iezzoni;C. Weebadde;J. Luby;Chengyan Yue

  • Characterization of Iranian grapevine cultivars using microsatellite markers

    R. Fatahi;A. Ebadi;N. Bassil;S. A. Mehlenbacher

  • Genetic stability of cryopreserved shoot tips of Rubus germplasm

    Nina Rosa F. Castillo;Nahla V. Bassil;Sugae Wada;Barbara M. Reed

  • Genetic diversity in the highbush blueberry evaluated with microsatellite markers

    Peter Boches;Nahla V. Bassil;Lisa Rowland

  • High-quality, genome-wide SNP genotypic data for pedigreed germplasm of the diploid outbreeding species apple, peach, and sweet cherry through a common workflow

    Stijn Vanderzande;Nicholas P. Howard;Nicholas P. Howard;Lichun Cai;Cassia Da Silva Linge

  • Unraveling the Complex Hybrid Ancestry and Domestication History of Cultivated Strawberry.

    Michael A Hardigan;Anne Lorant;Dominique D A Pincot;Mitchell J Feldmann

  • A near complete, chromosome-scale assembly of the black raspberry (Rubus occidentalis) genome

    Robert VanBuren;Ching Man Wai;Marivi Colle;Jie Wang

  • Diversity of wild Pyrus communis based on microsatellite analyses

    Gayle M. Volk;Christopher M. Richards;Adam D. Henk;Ann A. Reilley

  • Genetic diversity in wild and cultivated black raspberry (Rubus occidentalis L.) evaluated by simple sequence repeat markers

    Michael Dossett;Nahla V. Bassil;Kim S. Lewers;Chad E. Finn

  • Microsatellite Markers for Raspberry and Blackberry

    Nina R.F. Castillo;Barbara M. Reed;Julie Graham;Felicidad Fernández-Fernández

  • Genetic and genomic resources for Rubus breeding: a roadmap for the future.

    Toshi M Foster;Nahla V Bassil;Michael Dossett;Margaret Leigh Worthington

Frequent Co-Authors

Chad E. Finn
Chad E. Finn Agricultural Research Service
Kim E. Hummer
Kim E. Hummer Oregon State University
Amy F. Iezzoni
Amy F. Iezzoni Michigan State University
Vance M. Whitaker
Vance M. Whitaker University of Florida
James F. Hancock
James F. Hancock Michigan State University
Todd C. Mockler
Todd C. Mockler Donald Danforth Plant Science Center
Lisa J. Rowland
Lisa J. Rowland Agricultural Research Service
Shawn A. Mehlenbacher
Shawn A. Mehlenbacher Oregon State University
David Chagné
David Chagné Plant & Food Research
Patrick P. Edger
Patrick P. Edger Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Nahla V. Bassil

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles