World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
38750
World Ranking
13433
National Ranking
1252

Paul Garner publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Garner sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 366 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Paul Garner D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paul Garner sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paul Garner is affiliated with the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with significant contributions in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Neurology, and General Health Professions.

The scientist has extensively published in multiple venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • BMJ Open
  • PLoS ONE
  • PLoS Biology

Paul Garner's scholarly output includes several recent papers focused on research guidelines and animal research, particularly in the year 2020. Notable publications include:

  • "The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research," 2020, PLoS Biology
  • "The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research," 2020, Experimental Physiology
  • "Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0," 2020, PLoS Biology
  • "The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research*," 2020, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
  • "The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research," 2020, British Journal of Pharmacology

Their areas of research focus encompass multiple topics, including:

  • Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Animal testing and alternatives
  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Paul Garner often collaborates with several frequent co-authors, such as:

  • Nathalie Percie du Sert
  • Viki Hurst
  • Amrita Ahluwalia
  • Sabina Alam
  • Marc T. Avey

Best Publications

  • The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research

    Nathalie Percie du Sert;Viki Hurst;Amrita Ahluwalia;Sabina Alam

  • Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the ARRIVE guidelines 2.0.

    Nathalie Percie du Sert;Amrita Ahluwalia;Sabina Alam;Marc T. Avey

  • SARS: Systematic Review of Treatment Effects

    Lauren J Stockman;Lauren J Stockman;Richard Bellamy;Paul Garner

  • Directly observed therapy for treating tuberculosis

    Jimmy Volmink;Paul Garner

  • Artesunate combinations for treatment of malaria: meta-analysis

    M Adjuik;A Babiker;P Garner;P Olliaro

  • Road traffic injuries in developing countries: a comprehensive review of epidemiological studies

    Wilson W. Odero;P. Garner;Anthony B. Zwi

  • GRADE guidelines 26: informative statements to communicate the findings of systematic reviews of interventions

    Nancy Santesso;Claire Glenton;Philipp Dahm;Paul Garner

  • Quality of private and public ambulatory health care in low and middle income countries: systematic review of comparative studies

    Sima Berendes;Peter Heywood;Sandy Oliver;Paul Garner

  • Deworming drugs for soil-transmitted intestinal worms in children: effects on nutritional indicators, haemoglobin, and school performance

    David C Taylor-Robinson;Nicola Maayan;Karla Soares-Weiser;Sarah Donegan

  • Interpretation of subgroup analyses in systematic reviews: A tutorial

    Martha Richardson;Paul Garner;Sarah Donegan

  • Amodiaquine-artesunate versus amodiaquine for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in African children: a randomised, multicentre trial.

    M. Adjuik;P. Agnamey;A. Babiker;S. Borrmann;S. Borrmann

  • Intermittent preventive therapy for malaria during pregnancy using 2 vs 3 or more doses of sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine and risk of low birth weight in Africa: systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Kassoum Kayentao;Paul Garner;Anne Maria van Eijk;Inbarani Naidoo

  • Selective versus routine use of episiotomy for vaginal birth

    Hong Jiang;Xu Qian;Guillermo Carroli;Paul Garner

  • Artemisinin-based combination therapy for treating uncomplicated malaria.

    David Sinclair;Babalwa Zani;Sarah Donegan;Piero Olliaro

  • Systematic review of amodiaquine treatment in uncomplicated malaria

    P Olliaro;C Nevill;J LeBras;P Ringwald

  • When and how to update systematic reviews: consensus and checklist.

    P Garner;S Hopewell;J Chandler;H MacLehose

  • Rapid diagnostic tests for diagnosing uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria in endemic countries

    Katharine Abba;Jonathan J Deeks;Piero L Olliaro;Cho‐Min Naing

  • Low Carbohydrate versus Isoenergetic Balanced Diets for Reducing Weight and Cardiovascular Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Celeste E. Naude;Anel Schoonees;Marjanne Senekal;Taryn Young

  • Directly observed therapy and treatment adherence.

    Jimmy Volmink;Patrice Matchaba;Paul Garner

  • The Impact of Pyrethroid Resistance on the Efficacy of Insecticide-Treated Bed Nets against African Anopheline Mosquitoes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Clare Strode;Sarah Donegan;Paul Garner;Ahmad Ali Enayati

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Sinclair
David A. Sinclair Harvard University
Piero Olliaro
Piero Olliaro University of Oxford
Paula R Williamson
Paula R Williamson University of Liverpool
Julia A Critchley
Julia A Critchley St George's, University of London
Peter Tugwell
Peter Tugwell University of Ottawa
Jonathan J Deeks
Jonathan J Deeks University of Birmingham
Thomas R. Burkot
Thomas R. Burkot Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine
Stephen T. Holgate
Stephen T. Holgate University of Southampton
Ole H. Petersen
Ole H. Petersen Cardiff University
Ulrich Dirnagl
Ulrich Dirnagl Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine doesn’t always mean becoming a doctor. A variety of accessible online degree programs open the door to rewarding healthcare roles. If you’re seeking a practical, patient-focused path, consider these easiest nursing programs to get into. Many options are available for individuals looking for streamlined entry into nursing without excessive barriers.

For those drawn to healthcare but interested in administrative or behind-the-scenes roles, medical billing and coding schools online offer a flexible and in-demand career pathway. These accredited programs often come with financial aid, making them accessible for a wide range of students.

Wondering about admission requirements? Not all nursing programs are the same. It’s helpful to know: do all nursing schools require the teas exam? Some top programs now drop standardized test requirements, offering alternative pathways to qualification.

If you’re interested in the business side of healthcare, explore a healthcare administration degree. These accelerated online programs prepare graduates for leadership positions—an ideal option for those who want to make a broad impact in healthcare settings.

Best Scientists Citing Paul Garner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles