World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
34
Citations
5484
World Ranking
5308
National Ranking
205

Pietro Tonutti publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pietro Tonutti sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 169 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Pietro Tonutti D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pietro Tonutti sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The high-quality draft genome of peach ( Prunus persica ) identifies unique patterns of genetic diversity, domestication and genome evolution

    Ignazio Verde;Albert G Abbott;Simone Scalabrin

  • Primary Metabolism in Fresh Fruits During Storage.

    Stefano Brizzolara;George A. Manganaris;Vasileios Fotopoulos;Christopher B. Watkins

  • The ethylene biosynthetic and signal transduction pathways are differently affected by 1-MCP in apple and peach fruit

    Valeriano Dal Cin;Fabio Massimo Rizzini;Alessandro Botton;Pietro Tonutti

  • Characterization of two putative ethylene receptor genes expressed during peach fruit development and abscission

    Angela Rasori;Benedetto Ruperti;Claudio Bonghi;Pietro Tonutti

  • The use of microarray μPEACH1.0 to investigate transcriptome changes during transition from pre-climacteric to climacteric phase in peach fruit

    Livio Trainotti;Claudio Bonghi;Fiorenza Ziliotto;Dario Zanin

  • Characterization and expression of two members of the peach 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate oxidase gene family.

    Benedetto Ruperti;Claudio Bonghi;Angela Rasori;Angelo Ramina

  • Ethylene Evolution and 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate Oxidase Gene Expression during Early Development and Ripening of Peach Fruit

    Pietro Tonutti;Claudio Bonghi;Benedetto Ruperti;Giovanni Battista Tornielli

  • Peach fruit ripening and quality in relation to picking time, and hypoxic and high CO2 short-term postharvest treatments.

    C Bonghi;A Ramina;B Ruperti;R Vidrih

  • Ethylene Biosynthesis During Peach Fruit-development

    Pietro Tonutti;P. Casson;Angelo Ramina

  • Transcriptome profiling of ripening nectarine (Prunus persica L. Batsch) fruit treated with 1-MCP

    Fiorenza Ziliotto;Maura Begheldo;Angela Rasori;Claudio Bonghi

  • Computational annotation of genes differentially expressed along olive fruit development.

    Giulio Galla;Gianni Barcaccia;Angelo Ramina;Silvio Collani

  • Postharvest water loss induces marked changes in transcript profiling in skins of wine grape berries

    Fabio Massimo Rizzini;Claudio Bonghi;Pietro Tonutti

  • Post-harvest UV-B irradiation induces changes of phenol contents and corresponding biosynthetic gene expression in peaches and nectarines.

    Claudia Scattino;Antonella Castagna;Susanne Neugart;Helen M. Chan

  • Effects of Se-enrichment on yield, fruit composition and ripening of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) plants grown in hydroponics

    B. Pezzarossa;I. Rosellini;E. Borghesi;P. Tonutti

  • Endo‐β‐1,4‐glucanases are involved in peach fruit growth and ripening, and regulated by ethylene

    Claudio Bonghi;Luca Ferrarese;Benedetto Ruperti;Pietro Tonutti

  • Fruit firmness and ethylene biosynthesis in three cultivars of peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch)

    Pietro Tonutti;Claudio Bonghi;Angelo Ramina

  • Phenol compound metabolism and gene expression in the skin of wine grape (Vitis vinifera L.) berries subjected to partial postharvest dehydration

    Claudio Bonghi;Fabio Massimo Rizzini;Angelita Gambuti;Luigi Moio

  • Biochemical and molecular aspects of fruitlet abscission.

    Claudio Bonghi;Pietro Tonutti;Angelo Ramina

  • Cell wall hydrolases and amylase in kiwifruit softening

    Claudio Bonghi;Silvana Pagni;Rajko Vidrih;Angelo Ramina

  • Extreme Hypoxic Conditions Induce Selective Molecular Responses and Metabolic Reset in Detached Apple Fruit

    Dubravka Cukrov;Monica Zermiani;Stefano Brizzolara;Alessandro Cestaro

  • Different postharvest conditions modulate ripening and ethylene biosynthetic and signal transduction pathways in Stony Hard peaches

    Maura Begheldo;George A. Manganaris;Claudio Bonghi;Pietro Tonutti

  • Effects of irrigation on fruit ripening behavior and metabolic changes in olive

    F. Martinelli;F. Martinelli;B. Basile;G. Morelli;R. d’Andria

  • Short-term postharvest carbon dioxide treatments induce selective molecular and metabolic changes in grape berries.

    Elisa Becatti;Lamia Chkaiban;Pietro Tonutti;Claudio Forcato

Frequent Co-Authors

Claudio Bonghi
Claudio Bonghi University of Padua
Angelo Ramina
Angelo Ramina University of Padua
Annamaria Ranieri
Annamaria Ranieri University of Pisa
George A. Manganaris
George A. Manganaris Cyprus University of Technology
Damiano Remorini
Damiano Remorini University of Pisa
Carlos H. Crisosto
Carlos H. Crisosto University of California, Davis
Giovanni Agati
Giovanni Agati National Research Council (CNR)
Luca Sebastiani
Luca Sebastiani Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
Paul Holford
Paul Holford Western Sydney University
Lucia Guidi
Lucia Guidi University of Pisa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Pietro Tonutti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles