World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
60
Citations
16279
World Ranking
11786
National Ranking
5068

Lawrence C. Sowers publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence C. Sowers sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 165 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Lawrence C. Sowers D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lawrence C. Sowers sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lawrence C. Sowers is affiliated with The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a significant emphasis on Molecular Biology.

The main topics covered in their work include DNA Repair Mechanisms, Epigenetics and DNA Methylation, Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics, DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry, Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, and Advanced Biosensing and Bioanalysis Techniques.

Frequent publication venues where their research appears include Neuro-Oncology, Molecules, Chemical Research in Toxicology, UNC Libraries, and the International Journal of Molecular Sciences.

Some of their recent papers are:

  • Role of Tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification (2020, UNC Libraries)
  • Glioblastoma and Methionine Addiction (2022, International Journal of Molecular Sciences)
  • Chemical and enzymatic modifications of 5-methylcytosine at the intersection of DNA damage, repair, and epigenetic reprogramming (2022, PLoS ONE)
  • A combinatorial system to examine the enzymatic repair of multiply damaged DNA substrates (2022, Nucleic Acids Research)
  • DNA Base Excision Repair Intermediates Influence Duplex-Quadruplex Equilibrium (2023, Molecules)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Lawrence C. Sowers include:

  • Mark L. Sowers
  • Jason Herring
  • Tuvshintugs Baljinnyam
  • Linda C. Hackfeld
  • James W. Conrad

Best Publications

  • Role of Tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification

    Shinsuke Ito;Ana C. D’Alessio;Ana C. D’Alessio;Olena V. Taranova;Olena V. Taranova;Kwonho Hong;Kwonho Hong

  • Endogenous bile acids are ligands for the nuclear receptor FXR/BAR.

    Haibo Wang;Jasmine Chen;Kevin Hollister;Lawrence C Sowers

  • Oxidative damage to methyl-CpG sequences inhibits the binding of the methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) of methyl-CpG binding protein 2 (MeCP2)

    Victoria Valinluck;Hsin-Hao Tsai;Daniel K. Rogstad;Artur Burdzy

  • Endogenous Cytosine Damage Products Alter the Site Selectivity of Human DNA Maintenance Methyltransferase DNMT1

    Victoria Valinluck;Lawrence C. Sowers

  • Comparison between DNA melting thermodynamics and DNA polymerase fidelity.

    John Petruska;Myron F. Goodman;Michael S. Boosalis;Lawrence C. Sowers

  • Base pairing and mutagenesis: observation of a protonated base pair between 2-aminopurine and cytosine in an oligonucleotide by proton NMR.

    Lawrence Sowers;G. V. Fazakerley;R. Eritja;B. E. Kaplan

  • Dynamics of mismatched base pairs in DNA.

    Christopher R. Guest;Remo A. Hochstrasser;Remo A. Hochstrasser;Lawrence C. Sowers;Lawrence C. Sowers;David P. Millar;David P. Millar

  • Reverse chemical mutagenesis: identification of the mutagenic lesions resulting from reactive oxygen species-mediated damage to DNA

    Daniel I. Feig;Lawrence C. Sowers;Lawrence A. Loeb

  • First Principles Calculation of pKa Values for 5-Substituted Uracils

    Yun Hee Jang;Lawrence C. Sowers;Tahir Çağin;William A. Goddard

  • pKa Values of Guanine in Water: Density Functional Theory Calculations Combined with Poisson-Boltzmann Continuum-Solvation Model

    Yun Hee Jang;William A. Goddard;Katherine T. Noyes;Lawrence C. Sowers

  • The abasic site as a challenge to DNA polymerase: A nuclear magnetic resonance study of G, C and T opposite a model abasic site

    Ph Cuniasse;G. V. Fazakerley;W. Guschlbauer;B. E. Kaplan

  • Comparison of nucleotide interactions in water, proteins, and vacuum: Model for DNA polymerase fidelity

    J. Petruska;Lawrence Sowers;M. F. Goodman

  • Mechanism of human methyl-directed DNA methyltransferase and the fidelity of cytosine methylation.

    Steven S. Smith;Bruce E. Kaplan;Lawrence C. Sowers;Edward M. Newman

  • Inflammation-mediated cytosine damage: A mechanistic link between inflammation and the epigenetic alterations in human cancers

    Victoria Valinluck;Lawrence C. Sowers

  • The nucleotide analog 2-aminopurine as a spectroscopic probe of nucleotide incorporation by the Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli polymerase I and bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase.

    Michelle West Frey;Lawrence C. Sowers;David P. Millar;Stephen J. Benkovic

  • Metabolism and anti-human immunodeficiency virus-1 activity of 2-halo-2',3'-dideoxyadenosine derivatives.

    T. Haertle;C. J. Carrera;D. B. Wasson;Lawrence Sowers

  • A fluorescence-based assay for monitoring helicase activity.

    Kevin D. Raney;Lawrence C. Sowers;David P. Millar;Stephen J. Benkovic

  • Molecular basis of cisplatin resistance in human carcinomas: model systems and patients.

    K. J. Scanlon;M. Kashani-Sabet;H. Miyachi;Lawrence Sowers

  • Base stacking and molecular polarizability: Effect of a methyl group in the 5-position of pyrimidines

    Lawrence C. Sowers;Barbara Ramsay Shaw;W.David Sedwick

  • DNA base modification: ionized base pairs and mutagenesis

    Lawrence C. Sowers;Barbara Ramsay Shaw;Martina L. Veigl;W. David Sedwick

Frequent Co-Authors

Myron F. Goodman
Myron F. Goodman University of Southern California
Ramon Eritja
Ramon Eritja Spanish National Research Council
William A. Goddard
William A. Goddard California Institute of Technology
David P. Millar
David P. Millar Scripps Research Institute
Allan R. Brasier
Allan R. Brasier University of Wisconsin–Madison
Adrian Bird
Adrian Bird University of Edinburgh
Stephen J. Benkovic
Stephen J. Benkovic Pennsylvania State University
Ping Wu
Ping Wu The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Jiping Tang
Jiping Tang Loma Linda University
Tahir Cagin
Tahir Cagin Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Biology or Biochemistry can open doors to diverse professional paths, both in research and applied sciences. Increasingly, online programs are helping students advance their education and careers in health and science fields more flexibly than ever.

For those interested in nursing, consider exploring the best online rn to bsn programs to build on your clinical expertise and increase your career options. If your interests align with healthcare leadership, an online masters healthcare management degree can prepare you for management roles in hospitals, clinics, or biotech firms.

There's a growing demand for mental health professionals as well. The psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner programs online offer a streamlined path to advanced practice roles. For those looking to specialize in wellness and dietetics, a fast track nutrition degree online can provide targeted, science-based knowledge tailored for careers in nutrition.

These online programs make it easier than ever to upskill and diversify your career options in the life sciences—often at your own pace.

Best Scientists Citing Lawrence C. Sowers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles