World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 89 2552 2340 188 177 485 29186

Thomas Carell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas Carell between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas Carell published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 17.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2011. 37 of the 568 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2011. 1993: 2 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 8 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 20 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 32 publications 2008: 24 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 30 publications 2011: 37 publications 2012: 32 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 29 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 25 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 20 publications 2025: 17 publications
1993 2025

568 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas Carell: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 2
1994 6
1995 7
1996 4
1997 5
1998 7
1999 5
2000 7
2001 1
2002 8
2003 7
2004 20
2005 10
2006 17
2007 32
2008 24
2009 31
2010 30
2011 37
2012 32
2013 28
2014 29
2015 23
2016 21
2017 12
2018 16
2019 17
2020 26
2021 25
2022 23
2023 19
2024 20
2025 17
Total 568
Download as CSV

Thomas Carell publications per year - data summary

  • Thomas Carell, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, has 568 publications recorded across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1993 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2011, with 37 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 2001, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 17.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 17.2 per year counting only the 33 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 104 publications, 18% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1993-2003: 59 publications (5.4 per year); 2004-2014: 290 publications (26.4 per year); 2015-2025: 219 publications (19.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Thomas Carell publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Carell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 477–486 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 485 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80 485
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas Carell publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 19,587 Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 100 ranges running from 47–56 to 1,028+ publications.
  • Thomas Carell, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, records 485 publications - the 94th percentile of the discipline.
  • 94% of ranked Biology and Biochemistry scientists score the same or lower than Thomas Carell, and about 6% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 197–206 publications range, and Thomas Carell ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 127–136 publications, holding 980 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 77% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 287–296 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Thomas Carell D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Carell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273 89
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Thomas Carell D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 19,587 Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 65 ranges running from 40–41 to 167+ D-Index.
  • Thomas Carell, a Biology and Biochemistry scholar from Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, records 89 D-Index - the 87th percentile of the discipline.
  • 87% of ranked Biology and Biochemistry scientists score the same or lower than Thomas Carell, and about 13% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 64–65 D-Index range, and Thomas Carell ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 58–59 D-Index, holding 1,253 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 71% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 72–73 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Chemistry

Overview

Thomas Carell is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a specialized concentration in Molecular Biology, Immunology, Materials Chemistry, Astronomy and Astrophysics, and Organic Chemistry.

Their scientific work covers a broad range of topics, including:

  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques
  • Interferon and immune responses
  • DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry

Thomas Carell has published extensively in notable journals and publication venues. They have contributed 21 publications to both Angewandte Chemie International Edition and Angewandte Chemie, 14 to bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), 11 to The Cambridge Structural Database, and 7 to Nature Communications.

Frequent collaborators include Markus Müller, Franziska R. Traube, Mirko Wagner, Eva Korytiaková, and Matthias Heiß, with whom Carell has co-authored multiple papers.

Significant recent publications include:

  • A prebiotically plausible scenario of an RNA-peptide world (2022), published in Nature
  • Targeting the nucleotide salvage factor DNPH1 sensitizes BRCA-deficient cells to PARP inhibitors (2021), published in Science
  • Recent evolution of a TET-controlled and DPPA3/STELLA-driven pathway of passive DNA demethylation in mammals (2020), published in Nature Communications
  • STING agonism turns human T cells into interferon-producing cells but impedes their functionality (2023), published in EMBO Reports
  • Third-Generation Sequencing of Epigenetic DNA (2022), published in Angewandte Chemie International Edition

Thomas Carell was recognized by the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina in 2008 for contributions in Chemistry.

Best Publications

  • Dynamic Readers for 5-(Hydroxy)Methylcytosine and Its Oxidized Derivatives

    Cornelia G. Spruijt;Felix Gnerlich;Arne H. Smits;Toni Pfaffeneder

  • Tissue distribution of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine and search for active demethylation intermediates

    Daniel Globisch;Martin Münzel;Markus Müller;Stylianos Michalakis

  • DNA--metal base pairs.

    Guido H. Clever;Corinna Kaul;Thomas Carell

  • Click chemistry as a reliable method for the high-density postsynthetic functionalization of alkyne-modified DNA.

    Johannes Gierlich;Glenn A Burley;Philipp M E Gramlich;David M Hammond

  • Thymine Dimerization in DNA is an Ultrafast Photoreaction

    Wolfgang J. Schreier;Tobias E. Schrader;Florian O. Koller;Peter Gilch

  • The Discovery of 5-Formylcytosine in Embryonic Stem Cell DNA†

    Toni Pfaffeneder;Benjamin Hackner;Matthias Truß;Martin Münzel

  • Tumour hypoxia causes DNA hypermethylation by reducing TET activity

    Bernard Thienpont;Jessica Steinbacher;Hui Zhao;Flora D’Anna

  • N6-methyladenosine (m6A) recruits and repels proteins to regulate mRNA homeostasis.

    Raghu R Edupuganti;Simon Geiger;Rik G H Lindeboom;Hailing Shi

  • Postsynthetic DNA Modification through the Copper‐Catalyzed Azide–Alkyne Cycloaddition Reaction

    Philipp M. E. Gramlich;Christian T. Wirges;Antonio Manetto;Thomas Carell

  • Quantification of the sixth DNA base hydroxymethylcytosine in the brain.

    Martin Münzel;Daniel Globisch;Tobias Brückl;Mirko Wagner

  • Crystal Structure of a Photolyase Bound to a CPD-Like DNA Lesion After in Situ Repair

    Alexandra Mees;Tobias Klar;Petra Gnau;Ulrich Hennecke

  • Error-prone replication of oxidatively damaged DNA by a high-fidelity DNA polymerase

    Gerald W Hsu;Matthias Ober;Thomas Carell;Lorena S Beese

  • Directed DNA Metallization

    Glenn A Burley;Johannes Gierlich;Mohammad R Mofid;Hadar Nir

  • Two-polymerase mechanisms dictate error-free and error-prone translesion DNA synthesis in mammals

    Sigal Shachar;Omer Ziv;Sharon Avkin;Sheera Adar

  • Programmable self-assembly of metal ions inside artificial DNA duplexes

    Kentaro Tanaka;Kentaro Tanaka;Guido H. Clever;Yusuke Takezawa;Yasuyuki Yamada

  • Tet oxidizes thymine to 5-hydroxymethyluracil in mouse embryonic stem cell DNA

    Toni Pfaffeneder;Fabio Spada;Mirko Wagner;Caterina Brandmayr

  • A Novel Procedure for the Synthesis of Libraries Containing Small Organic Molecules

    Thomas Carell;Edward A. Wintner;A. Bashir‐Hashemi;Julius Rebek

  • CPD damage recognition by transcribing RNA polymerase II

    F. Brueckner;U. Hennecke;T. Carell;P. Cramer

  • Click–Click–Click: Single to Triple Modification of DNA

    Philipp M. E. Gramlich;Simon Warncke;Johannes Gierlich;Thomas Carell

  • 5‐Hydroxymethylcytosine, the Sixth Base of the Genome

    Martin Münzel;Daniel Globisch;Thomas Carell

Frequent Co-Authors

Wolfgang Zinth
Wolfgang Zinth Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Guido H. Clever
Guido H. Clever TU Dortmund University
Julius Rebek
Julius Rebek Scripps Research Institute
Martin Biel
Martin Biel Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Heinrich Leonhardt
Heinrich Leonhardt Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Ilme Schlichting
Ilme Schlichting Max Planck Society
Zvi Livneh
Zvi Livneh Weizmann Institute of Science
Ulrich Simon
Ulrich Simon RWTH Aachen University
Patrick Cramer
Patrick Cramer Max Planck Society
Paul Knochel
Paul Knochel Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry opens the door to several dynamic career paths—many of which now offer flexible, online degree and certificate options. Whether you're interested in human health, scientific research, or allied health professions, there are specialized programs to fit your goals.

For those drawn to exercise science and human movement, consider online kinesiology degrees, which prepare students for careers in fitness, rehabilitation, and sports medicine. Meanwhile, professionals with a nursing background can expand their expertise through fast-tracked certifications. You might pursue a 1 year pmhnp program online to become a psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioner, or complete a 1 year post master's fnp online certificate to qualify as a family nurse practitioner.

Nutrition and biochemistry are closely linked, and those passionate about diet and wellness can pursue an online dietitian degree. This leads to careers in clinical nutrition, food policy, or public health. By choosing a related online degree, you can align your education with emerging job opportunities and specialize in the area that excites you most.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Carell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles