World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jacques W.M. Lenders

Jacques W.M. Lenders

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
29763
World Ranking
13585
National Ranking
517

Jacques W.M. Lenders publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacques W.M. Lenders sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 380 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jacques W.M. Lenders D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jacques W.M. Lenders sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jacques W.M. Lenders is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands and conducts research primarily in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Surgery, Cancer Research, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Neurology. Their research spans multiple subfields, reflecting a broad and multidisciplinary approach to medical science.

Their recent research outputs include several papers addressing key topics in endocrinology and hypertension. Some notable recent publications are:

  • Genetics, diagnosis, management and future directions of research of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma: a position statement and consensus of the Working Group on Endocrine Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension, 2020, Journal of Hypertension
  • International Histopathology Consensus for Unilateral Primary Aldosteronism, 2020, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • International consensus on initial screening and follow-up of asymptomatic SDHx mutation carriers, 2021, Nature Reviews Endocrinology
  • Subtype diagnosis, treatment, complications and outcomes of primary aldosteronism and future direction of research: a position statement and consensus of the Working Group on Endocrine Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension, 2020, Journal of Hypertension
  • Use of Steroid Profiling Combined With Machine Learning for Identification and Subtype Classification in Primary Aldosteronism, 2020, JAMA Network Open

The research topics covered by Lenders' work include:

  • Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
  • Pituitary Gland Disorders and Treatments
  • Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders

Lenders frequently collaborates with various researchers in their field. Their most frequent co-authors include:

  • Graeme Eisenhofer
  • Christina Pamporaki
  • Aleksander Prejbisz
  • Henri Timmers
  • Karel Pacák

Lenders' work is published in well-known scientific venues, indicating consistent scholarly activity in important journals and platforms. These publication venues include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • Journal of Hypertension
  • Nature Reviews Endocrinology
  • Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)

Best Publications

  • Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: An endocrine society clinical practice guideline

    Jacques W.M. Lenders;Quan Yang Duh;Graeme Eisenhofer;Anne Paule Gimenez-Roqueplo

  • Biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma: which test is best?

    Jacques W. M. Lenders;Karel Pacak;McClellan M. Walther;W. Marston Linehan

  • Outcomes after adrenalectomy for unilateral primary aldosteronism: an international consensus on outcome measures and analysis of remission rates in an international cohort

    Tracy A Williams;Tracy A Williams;Jacques W M Lenders;Jacques W M Lenders;Paolo Mulatero;Jacopo Burrello

  • An immunohistochemical procedure to detect patients with paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma with germline SDHB, SDHC, or SDHD gene mutations: a retrospective and prospective analysis.

    Francien H van Nederveen;José Gaal;Judith Favier;Esther Korpershoek

  • An expert consensus statement on use of adrenal vein sampling for the subtyping of primary aldosteronism.

    Gian Paolo Rossi;Richard J. Auchus;Morris Brown;Jacques W.M. Lenders;Jacques W.M. Lenders

  • Biochemical Diagnosis of Pheochromocytoma: How to Distinguish True- from False-Positive Test Results

    Graeme Eisenhofer;David S. Goldstein;McClellan M. Walther;Peter Friberg

  • European Society of Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline for long-term follow-up of patients operated on for a phaeochromocytoma or a paraganglioma

    P F Plouin;L Amar;O M Dekkers;M Fassnacht

  • Plasma normetanephrine and metanephrine for detecting pheochromocytoma in von Hippel-Lindau disease and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2.

    G. Eisenhofer;J. W. M. Lenders;W. M. Linehan;M. M. Walther

  • Clinical presentations, biochemical phenotypes, and genotype-phenotype correlations in patients with succinate dehydrogenase subunit B-associated pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas.

    Henri J. L. M. Timmers;Anna Kozupa;Graeme Eisenhofer;Margarita Raygada

  • Pheochromocytomas in von Hippel-Lindau Syndrome and Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2 Display Distinct Biochemical and Clinical Phenotypes

    Graeme Eisenhofer;McClellan M. Walther;Thanh Truc Huynh;Sheng Ting Li

  • MAX Mutations Cause Hereditary and Sporadic Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma

    Nelly Burnichon;Alberto Cascón;Francesca Schiavi;Nicole Paes Morales

  • Study Heterogeneity and Estimation of Prevalence of Primary Aldosteronism: A Systematic Review and Meta-Regression Analysis

    Sabine C. Käyser;Tanja Dekkers;Hans J. Groenewoud;Gert Jan van der Wilt

  • SDHAF2 mutations in familial and sporadic paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma

    Jean Pierre Bayley;Henricus P.M. Kunst;Alberto Cascon;Maria Lourdes Sampietro

  • Plasma Metanephrines Are Markers of Pheochromocytoma Produced by Catechol-O-Methyltransferase Within Tumors

    Graeme Eisenhofer;Harry Keiser;Peter Friberg;Eva Mezey

  • Plasma methoxytyramine: A novel biomarker of metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma in relation to established risk factors of tumour size, location and SDHB mutation status

    Graeme Eisenhofer;Jacques W.M. Lenders;Gabriele Siegert;Stefan R. Bornstein

  • Superiority of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography to other functional imaging techniques in the evaluation of metastatic SDHB-associated pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

    Henri J.L.M. Timmers;Anna Kozupa;Clara C. Chen;Jorge A. Carrasquillo

  • Cardiovascular manifestations of phaeochromocytoma

    Aleksander Prejbisz;Jacques W.M. Lenders;Graeme Eisenhofer;Andrzej Januszewicz

  • Genetics, diagnosis, management and future directions of research of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma: a position statement and consensus of the Working Group on Endocrine Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension.

    Jacques W M Lenders;Jacques W M Lenders;Michiel N Kerstens;Laurence Amar;Aleksander Prejbisz

  • Measurements of Plasma Methoxytyramine, Normetanephrine, and Metanephrine as Discriminators of Different Hereditary Forms of Pheochromocytoma

    Graeme Eisenhofer;Jacques W.M. Lenders;Henri Timmers;Massimo Mannelli

  • Adrenal vein sampling versus CT scan to determine treatment in primary aldosteronism: an outcome-based randomised diagnostic trial

    Tanja Dekkers;Aleksander Prejbisz;Leo J Schultze Kool;Hans J M M Groenewoud

Frequent Co-Authors

Karel Pacak
Karel Pacak National Institutes of Health
Felix Beuschlein
Felix Beuschlein University of Zurich
Martin Reincke
Martin Reincke Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Massimo Mannelli
Massimo Mannelli University of Florence
David S. Goldstein
David S. Goldstein National Institutes of Health
Fred C.G.J. Sweep
Fred C.G.J. Sweep Radboud University
Martin Fassnacht
Martin Fassnacht University of Würzburg
Wouter Wieling
Wouter Wieling University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medicine but seeking alternatives to a traditional MD degree, there are several flexible and affordable online options that can open doors in healthcare. Pursuing a low cost medical coding and billing online program is a fast track to essential support roles in the industry, with many programs designed for working adults.

Students aiming to advance their clinical expertise might consider cheap np programs, which provide a pathway to becoming a Nurse Practitioner, one of the fastest-growing roles in healthcare. Meanwhile, individuals at the start of their nursing journey can benefit from the convenience and accessibility of nursing school online, enabling them to earn a degree while balancing other responsibilities.

For experienced nurses looking to take on leadership or academic positions, enrolling in online nursing doctoral programs can provide the advanced knowledge required for top-tier roles. Exploring these online programs can help you find a career path in healthcare that fits your schedule, interests, and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Jacques W.M. Lenders

Trending Scientists