World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
163
Citations
105383
World Ranking
97
National Ranking
63

Thomas M. Jessell publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Jessell sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 285 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Thomas M. Jessell D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas M. Jessell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 163 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Ralph W. Gerard Prize in Neuroscience, Society for Neuroscience
  • 2014 - Gruber Prize in Neuroscience, Society for Neuroscience
  • 2012 - Canada Gairdner International Award
  • 2009 - Perl-UNC Prize, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Defining Molecular Mechanisms that Regulate the Development of Neural Circuits
  • 2008 - Kavli Prize, The Kavli Foundation for discoveries on the developmental and functional logic of neuronal circuits
  • 2006 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2003 - Robert J. and Claire Pasarow Foundation Medical Research Award
  • 2002 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2001 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Thomas M. Jessell was affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their research focused extensively on neuroscience and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, contributing to various subfields such as cell biology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, neurology, and cognitive neuroscience.

Their recent published papers include:

  • Differential Loss of Spinal Interneurons in a Mouse Model of ALS, 2020, Neuroscience
  • Genetic targeting of adult Renshaw cells using a Calbindin 1 destabilized Cre allele for intersection with Parvalbumin or Engrailed1, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Distinct anatomical and functional corticospinal inputs innervate different spinal neuron types, 2024, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Muscle-derived Cues are Required to Specify Proprioceptor Pool Identity, 2022, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Potentiation of active locomotor state by spinal-projecting serotonergic neurons, 2024, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Their frequent co-authors were:

  • Susan Brenner-Morton
  • Jay B. Bikoff
  • Alina Salamatina
  • Jerry H. Yang
  • Linjing Fang

Their work was commonly published in several venues, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neuroscience
  • Scientific Reports
  • UNC Libraries

The main topics covered in their research were:

  • Zebrafish Biomedical Research Applications
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
  • Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Over the course of their career, Thomas M. Jessell received several awards, including:

  • Ralph W. Gerard Prize in Neuroscience, Society for Neuroscience, 2016
  • Gruber Prize in Neuroscience, Society for Neuroscience, 2014
  • Canada Gairdner International Award, 2012
  • Perl-UNC Prize, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 2009, for defining molecular mechanisms that regulate the development of neural circuits
  • Kavli Prize, The Kavli Foundation, 2008, for discoveries on the developmental and functional logic of neuronal circuits
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2006
  • Robert J. and Claire Pasarow Foundation Medical Research Award, 2003
  • Member of the National Academy of Sciences, 2002
  • Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM), 2001

Best Publications

  • Principles of Neural Science

    Eric R. Kandel;James H. Schwartz;Thomas M. Jessell

  • Cre reporter strains produced by targeted insertion of EYFP and ECFP into the ROSA26 locus

    Shankar Srinivas;Tomoko Watanabe;Chyuan-Sheng Lin;Chris M William

  • Neuronal specification in the spinal cord: inductive signals and transcriptional codes

    Thomas M. Jessell

  • Directed Differentiation of Embryonic Stem Cells into Motor Neurons

    Hynek Wichterle;Ivo Lieberam;Jeffery A. Porter;Thomas M. Jessell

  • The netrins define a family of axon outgrowth-promoting proteins homologous to C. elegans UNC-6

    Tito Serafini;Timothy E. Kennedy;Michael J. Gaiko;Christine Mirzayan

  • A homeodomain protein code specifying progenitor cell identity and neuronal fate in the ventral neural tube

    Thomas M. Jessell;James Briscoe;Johan Ericson;Johan Ericson

  • Topographic organization of embryonic motor neurons defined by expression of LIM homeobox genes

    T. Tsuchida;M. Ensini;S.B. Morton;M. Baldassare

  • Astrocytes expressing ALS-linked mutated SOD1 release factors selectively toxic to motor neurons

    Makiko Nagai;Diane B Re;Tetsuya Nagata;Alcmène Chalazonitis

  • Dorsal differentiation of neural plate cells induced by BMP-mediated signals from epidermal ectoderm

    Karel F Liem;Gabi Tremml;Henk Roelink;Thomas M Jessell

  • Pax6 Controls Progenitor Cell Identity and Neuronal Fate in Response to Graded Shh Signaling

    J Ericson;P Rashbass;A Schedl;S Brenner-Morton

  • Simultaneous Denoising, Deconvolution, and Demixing of Calcium Imaging Data

    Eftychios A. Pnevmatikakis;Daniel Soudry;Yuanjun Gao;Timothy A. Machado

  • Floor plate and motor neuron induction by different concentrations of the amino-terminal cleavage product of sonic hedgehog autoproteolysis

    H Roelink;J.A Porter;C Chiang;Y Tanabe

  • Two Critical Periods of Sonic Hedgehog Signaling Required for the Specification of Motor Neuron Identity

    Johan Ericson;Susan Morton;Atsushi Kawakami;Henk Roelink

  • Floor plate and motor neuron induction by vhh-1, a vertebrate homolog of hedgehog expressed by the notochord

    H. Roelink;A. Augsburger;J. Heemskerk;V. Korzh

  • Diversity and Pattern in the Developing Spinal Cord

    Yasuto Tanabe;Thomas M. Jessell

  • Axon guidance and the patterning of neuronal projections in vertebrates

    Jane Dodd;Thomas M. Jessell

  • Intrathecal morphine inhibits substance P release from mammalian spinal cord in vivo

    T. L. Yaksh;T. M. Jessell;R. Gamse;A. W. Mudge

  • Opiate analgesics inhibit substance P release from rat trigeminal nucleus

    Unknown

  • Molecular characterization of a functional cDNA encoding the serotonin 1c receptor.

    David Julius;Amy B. MacDermott;Richard Axel;Thomas M. Jessell

  • Requirement for LIM Homeobox Gene Isl1 in Motor Neuron Generation Reveals a Motor Neuron– Dependent Step in Interneuron Differentiation

    Samuel L. Pfaff;Monica Mendelsohn;Colin L. Stewart;Thomas Edlund

  • Homeobox gene Nkx2.2 and specification of neuronal identity by graded Sonic hedgehog signalling

    J. Briscoe;L. Sussel;P. Serup;D. Hartigan-O'Connor

  • Spatial regulation of axonal glycoprotein expression on subsets of embryonic spinal neurons

    J. Dodd;S.B. Morton;D. Karagogeos;M. Yamamoto

  • Independent requirement for ISL1 in formation of pancreatic mesenchyme and islet cells

    Ulf Ahlgren;Samuel L. Pfaff;Samuel L. Pfaff;Thomas M. Jessell;Thomas Edlund

Frequent Co-Authors

Silvia Arber
Silvia Arber University of Basel
Thomas Edlund
Thomas Edlund Umeå University
Eric R. Kandel
Eric R. Kandel Columbia University
Marc Tessier-Lavigne
Marc Tessier-Lavigne Xaira Therapeutics
Yutaka Yoshida
Yutaka Yoshida Cornell University
Samuel L. Pfaff
Samuel L. Pfaff Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Johan Ericson
Johan Ericson Karolinska Institute
Barry Honig
Barry Honig Columbia University
Lawrence Shapiro
Lawrence Shapiro Columbia University
James H. Schwartz
James H. Schwartz Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in neuroscience opens up several flexible educational and professional options. Many students today are exploring accelerated degrees online, which allow faster completion of coursework and a quicker entrance into the workforce. These programs are ideal for motivated learners eager to begin their careers or pivot to a new field.

When considering degree choices, it's important to be mindful of degrees that pay well. Neuroscience and related STEM fields frequently appear on lists of high-earning majors, making them attractive for students thinking about financial return. Exploring the current landscape of highest paying college majors can help inform your decision and align your studies with promising career pathways.

Affordability is another key factor. Fortunately, there are many online college courses with financial aid, so cost doesn't have to be a barrier to advancing your education. Exploring these options ensures you can pursue your neuroscience goals without compromising on budget or flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas M. Jessell

Recently Published Articles