World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
69
Citations
30909
World Ranking
7230
National Ranking
3316

Neuroscience

D-Index
69
Citations
30863
World Ranking
2574
National Ranking
1215

James H. Schwartz publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James H. Schwartz sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 162 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

James H. Schwartz D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James H. Schwartz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

James H. Schwartz was affiliated with Columbia University in the United States. Their research primarily focused on the field of Medicine, with particular attention to Emergency Medical Services, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, and Emergency Medicine as subfields of study.

Their work covered topics related to Disaster Response and Management, Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation, and Trauma and Emergency Care Studies.

James H. Schwartz published research in several venues, including:

  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Journal of Special Operations Medicine

Among their recent papers were:

  • WHEN SCI COMM BECOMES PERSONAL: 'ROCKS & ROCKETS' OUTREACH EVENT IN MY RURAL HOMETOWN, 2022, Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Proceedings of the 2023 Spring/Summer Meeting of the Committee for Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (C-TECC) and Committee Updates, 2023, Journal of Special Operations Medicine

Throughout their career, James H. Schwartz collaborated frequently with several co-authors including Jeanette S. Bosch, Pamela D. Kempton, Logan French, C. Marshall, and Sarah Lamm.

James H. Schwartz was recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1994 and was a member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Principles of Neural Science

    Eric R. Kandel;James H. Schwartz;Thomas M. Jessell

  • Molecular Biology of Learning: Modulation of Transmitter Release.

    Eric R. Kandel;James H. Schwartz

  • Lipoxygenase metabolites of arachidonic acid as second messengers for presynaptic inhibition of Aplysia sensory cells.

    D. Piomelli;A. Volterra;N. Dale;S. A. Siegelbaum

  • Essentials of Neural Science and Behavior

    Eric R. Kandel;James H. Schwartz;Thomas M. Jessell

  • Integration of Long-Term-Memory-Related Synaptic Plasticity Involves Bidirectional Regulation of Gene Expression and Chromatin Structure

    Zhonghui Guan;Maurizio Giustetto;Maurizio Giustetto;Stavros Lomvardas;Joung-Hun Kim

  • Intracellular injection of t he catalytic subunit of cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase simulates facilitation of transmitter release underlying behavioral sensitization in Aplysia

    Vincent F. Castellucci;Eric R. Kandel;James H. Schwartz;Frank D. Wilson

  • Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase Is an Immediate-Early Gene Essential for Long-Term Facilitation in Aplysia

    Ashok N. Hegde;Kaoru Inokuchi;Wanzheng Pei;Andrea Casadio

  • Phosphorylation-dependent subcellular translocation of a Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase produces an autonomous enzyme in Aplysia neurons.

    Tsunao Saitoh;James H. Schwartz

  • Principles of Neural Sciences

    Eric R Kandel;James H Schwartz

  • CREB-binding protein controls response to cocaine by acetylating histones at the fosB promoter in the mouse striatum

    Amir A. Levine;Zhonghui Guan;Angel Barco;Shiqin Xu

  • Facilitatory transmitter causes a selective and prolonged increase in adenosine 3':5'-monophosphate in sensory neurons mediating the gill and siphon withdrawal reflex in Aplysia

    Lise Bernier;Vincent F. Castellucci;Eric R. Kandel;James H. Schwartz

  • Inhibitor of adenosine 3':5'-monophosphate-dependent protein kinase blocks presynaptic facilitation in Aplysia.

    VF Castellucci;A Nairn;P Greengard;JH Schwartz

  • Axonal Transport: Components, Mechanisms, and Specificity

    James H Schwartz

  • A molecular mechanism for long-term sensitization in Aplysia.

    Steven M. Greenberg;Vincent F. Castellucci;Hagan Bayley;James H. Schwartz

  • Regulatory subunits of cAMP-dependent protein kinases are degraded after conjugation to ubiquitin: a molecular mechanism underlying long-term synaptic plasticity.

    A N Hegde;A L Goldberg;J H Schwartz

  • Classical conditioning and sensitization share aspects of the same molecular cascade in Aplysia.

    E.R. Kandel;T. Abrams;L. Bernier;T.J. Carew

  • Mechanisms for generating the autonomous cAMP-dependent protein kinase required for long-term facilitation in Aplysia.

    Daniel G Chain;Andrea Casadio;Samuel Schacher;Ashok N Hegde

  • Functioning of identified neurons and synapses in abdominal ganglion of Aplysia in absence of protein synthesis.

    J H Schwartz;V F Castellucci;E R Kandel

  • Cyclic Adenosine Monophosphate in the Nervous System of Aplysia californica : II. Effect of serotonin and dopamine

    Howard Cedar;James H. Schwartz

  • A family of genes that codes for ELH, a neuropeptide eliciting a stereotyped pattern of behavior in Aplysia

    Richard H. Scheller;James F. Jackson;Linda Beth McAllister;James H. Schwartz

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric R. Kandel
Eric R. Kandel Columbia University
Daniele Piomelli
Daniele Piomelli University of California, Irvine
Wayne S. Sossin
Wayne S. Sossin Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
David A. Harris
David A. Harris Boston University
James E. Goldman
James E. Goldman Columbia University
Steven M. Greenberg
Steven M. Greenberg Harvard University
Vincent F. Castellucci
Vincent F. Castellucci University of Montreal
Hagan Bayley
Hagan Bayley University of Oxford
Thomas M. Jessell
Thomas M. Jessell Columbia University
Samuel Schacher
Samuel Schacher Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in neuroscience but looking for flexible or alternative educational paths? There are several relevant online degrees and career routes to consider. Many students combine neuroscience interests with psychology, counseling, or social work fields, expanding their job options in healthcare, research, and therapy.

For those considering therapy, mft masters programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) are available online and can enhance clinical skills with a neuroscience background. If you’re curious about the cost of further specialization, explore how much does masters in psychology cost to help plan financially for your graduate studies.

Many future students search for the cheapest online bachelor's degree in psychology as an accessible path to careers in mental health and neuroscience-adjacent roles. For those considering social work as a pathway, you can explore the msw programs that are easier to access and offer versatile career prospects.

Combining neuroscience studies with online psychology, therapy, or social work degrees broadens your career opportunities in clinical, research, or educational settings.

Best Scientists Citing James H. Schwartz

Recently Published Articles