World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
122
Citations
51333
World Ranking
3496
National Ranking
132

H.M. Pinedo publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H.M. Pinedo sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 852 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

H.M. Pinedo D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where H.M. Pinedo sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 122 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

H.M. Pinedo is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their academic contributions include research published in the field of oncology, with a focus on topics discussed in reputable venues.

Pinedo has authored the paper titled Unus pro Omnibus, Omnes pro Uno (One for All, All for One), published in 2020 in The Oncologist. This publication represents their documented work in a peer-reviewed journal specializing in oncology.

Their frequent publication venue is:

  • The Oncologist

There are no recorded frequent co-authors or listed main fields, subfields, or main topics of study associated with Pinedo beyond the available publication.

Best Publications

  • The human multidrug resistance-associated protein MRP is a plasma membrane drug-efflux pump.

    G.J.R. Zaman;M.J. Flens;M.R. van Leusden;M. de Haas

  • The drug resistance-related protein LRP is the human major vault protein

    George L. Scheffer;Peter L.J. Wijngaard;Marcel J. Flens;Miguel A. Izquierdo

  • Levels of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α During Breast Carcinogenesis

    Reinhard Bos;Hua Zhong;Colleen F. Hanrahan;Ellen C. M. Mommers

  • Overexpression of a M(r) 110,000 vesicular protein in non-P-glycoprotein-mediated multidrug resistance.

    R.J. Scheper;H.J. Broxterman;G.L. Scheffer;P. Kaaijk

  • A phase I study of the natural killer T-cell ligand alpha-galactosylceramide (KRN7000) in patients with solid tumors.

    Giuseppe Giaccone;Cornelis J. A. Punt;Yoshitaka Ando;Rita Ruijter

  • Possible molecular mechanisms involved in the toxicity of angiogenesis inhibition

    Henk. M. W. Verheul;Herbert M. Pinedo

  • Active specific immunotherapy for stage II and stage III human colon cancer: a randomised trial

    Jan B Vermorken;Anke M E Claessen;Harm van Tinteren;Helen E Gall

  • Comparison of the sulforhodamine B protein and tetrazolium (MTT) assays for in vitro chemosensitivity testing.

    Yvonne P. Keepers;Paulo E. Pizao;Godefridus J. Peters;Jannette van Ark-Otte

  • Use of a targeted oncolytic poxvirus, JX-594, in patients with refractory primary or metastatic liver cancer: a phase I trial

    Byeong Ho Park;Taeho Hwang;Taeho Hwang;Ta Chiang Liu;Daniel Y. Sze

  • Antifolate resistance mediated by the multidrug resistance proteins MRP1 and MRP2.

    Jan Hendrik Hooijberg;Henk J. Broxterman;Marcel Kool;Yehuda G. Assaraf

  • Platelet: transporter of vascular endothelial growth factor.

    H.M.W. Verheul;K. Hoekman;S. Luykx-de Bakker;C.A. Eekman

  • Combined immunotherapy with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-transduced allogeneic prostate cancer cells and ipilimumab in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a phase 1 dose-escalation trial

    Alfons J M van den Eertwegh;Jurjen Versluis;H Pieter van den Berg;Saskia J A M Santegoets

  • Involvement of platelets in tumour angiogenesis

    H. M. Pinedo;H. M. W. Verheul;R. J. D'amato;R. J. D'amato;J. Folkman;J. Folkman

  • Induction of thymidylate synthase as a 5-fluorouracil resistance mechanism

    G.J Peters;H.H.J Backus;S Freemantle;B van Triest

  • Pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel and metabolites in a randomized comparative study in platinum-pretreated ovarian cancer patients

    M.T. Huizing;A.C.F. Keung;H. Rosing;V. van der Kuij

  • Determinants of resistance to 2′,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine (gemcitabine)

    Andries M Bergman;Herbert M Pinedo;Godefridus J Peters

  • Mechanism of Action of Antitumor Drug Etoposide: A Review

    J.M.S. van Maanen;J. Retel;J. de Vries;H.M. Pinedo

  • Taxanes: A New Class of Antitumor Agents

    M. T. Huizing;V. H. Sewberath Misser;R. C. Pieters;W. W. ten Bokkel Huinink

  • 5-Fluorouracil incorporation into RNA and DNA in relation to thymidylate synthase inhibition of human colorectal cancers

    P. Noordhuis;U. Holwerda;C. L. Van der Wilt;C. J. Van Groeningen

  • Dose-Finding and Pharmacokinetic Study of Cisplatin, Gemcitabine, and SU5416 in Patients With Solid Tumors

    Bart C. Kuenen;Lee Rosen;Egbert F. Smit;Mandy R.N. Parson

Frequent Co-Authors

Jan B. Vermorken
Jan B. Vermorken University of Antwerp
Jan Lankelma
Jan Lankelma Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Godefridus J. Peters
Godefridus J. Peters Gdańsk Medical University
Hidde J. Haisma
Hidde J. Haisma University of Groningen
Sybren L. Meijer
Sybren L. Meijer University of Amsterdam
Gerrit Jansen
Gerrit Jansen Amsterdam UMC
Jos H. Beijnen
Jos H. Beijnen Utrecht University
George L. Scheffer
George L. Scheffer VU University Medical Center
Hilde Rosing
Hilde Rosing Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital
David T. Curiel
David T. Curiel Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a medical career in the USA opens doors to many alternative and complementary pathways. Beyond the traditional MD route, multiple high-demand healthcare disciplines offer online degree options, combining flexibility and career advancement.

If you're interested in preventative health, best online nutrition programs can provide foundational knowledge in dietetics and health promotion—fields critical for public wellness. For those targeting healthcare leadership and administration, cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs build expertise for managerial roles in hospitals and healthcare organizations.

Nurses looking to boost qualifications can explore online rn-bsn programs without clinicals, ideal for working professionals seeking advancement without lab-based components. Meanwhile, advanced practitioners can fast-track leadership in nursing with accelerated dnp programs, designed for those seeking the highest level of clinical nursing education.

Exploring these online educational opportunities can open up rewarding healthcare careers that align with your interests, current credentials, and future goals.

Best Scientists Citing H.M. Pinedo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles