World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
58
Citations
11608
World Ranking
4176
National Ranking
242

John D. Steeves publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John D. Steeves sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 160 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

John D. Steeves D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John D. Steeves sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

John D. Steeves is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada and has a focused research portfolio primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields, notably Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Rehabilitation.

The scientist's research is concentrated on topics such as Spinal Cord Injury Research, Nerve Injury and Rehabilitation, Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations, Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders, Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery, Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials, and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews.

Frequent publication venues where John D. Steeves has contributed include:

  • Neurorehabilitation and neural repair
  • Spinal Cord
  • BMC Medical Research Methodology
  • Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
  • The Journal Of Hand Surgery

Recent publications authored or co-authored by John D. Steeves include:

  • Adaptive trial designs for spinal cord injury clinical trials directed to the central nervous system, 2020, Spinal Cord
  • Experimental Treatments for Spinal Cord Injury: What you Should Know, 2021, Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation
  • Evaluation of Functional Independence in Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Implications for Surgery to Restore Upper Limb Function, 2021, The Journal Of Hand Surgery
  • Spontaneous Motor Recovery after Cervical Spinal Cord Injury: Issues for Nerve Transfer Surgery Decision Making, 2022, Spinal Cord
  • Baseline-adjusted proportional odds models for the quantification of treatment effects in trials with ordinal sum score outcomes, 2020, BMC Medical Research Methodology

Throughout their career, John D. Steeves has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Armin Curt
  • Christine B. Novak
  • Catherine Curtin
  • Carie R. Kennedy
  • Katherine C. Stenson

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials

    J W Fawcett;A Curt;J D Steeves;W P Coleman

  • Minocycline Treatment Reduces Delayed Oligodendrocyte Death, Attenuates Axonal Dieback, and Improves Functional Outcome after Spinal Cord Injury

    David P. Stirling;Kourosh Khodarahmi;Jie Liu;Lowell T. McPhail

  • Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury (SCI) as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial outcome measures

    J. D. Steeves;D. Lammertse;A. Curt;J. W. Fawcett

  • Modulating astrogliosis after neurotrauma

    J. McGraw;G.W. Hiebert;J.D. Steeves

  • Orthostatic hypotension following spinal cord injury: understanding clinical pathophysiology

    V E Claydon;J D Steeves;A Krassioukov

  • Minocycline as a Neuroprotective Agent

    David P. Stirling;Kaveh M. Koochesfahani;John D. Steeves;Wolfram Tetzlaff

  • Suppression of Rho-kinase activity promotes axonal growth on inhibitory CNS substrates.

    Jaimie F Borisoff;Carmen C.M Chan;Gordon W Hiebert;Loren Oschipok

  • Triggering of locust jump by multimodal inhibitory interneurons.

    K. G. Pearson;W. J. Heitler;J. D. Steeves

  • Outcome measures in spinal cord injury: recent assessments and recommendations for future directions.

    Melannie S. Alexander;K. D. Anderson;F. Biering-Sorensen;A. R. Blight

  • Localization of a descending pathway in the spinal cord which is necessary for controlled treadmill locomotion

    John D. Steeves;Larry M. Jordan

  • Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP Panel: clinical trial inclusion/exclusion criteria and ethics.

    M H Tuszynski;M H Tuszynski;J D Steeves;J W Fawcett;D Lammertse;D Lammertse

  • Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: clinical trial design.

    D Lammertse;D Lammertse;M H Tuszynski;M H Tuszynski;J D Steeves;A Curt

  • Autoradiographic demonstration of the projections from the mesencephalic locomotor region

    John D. Steeves;Larry M. Jordan

  • Axonal regeneration contributes to repair of injured brainstem-spinal neurons in embryonic chick

    SJ Hasan;HS Keirstead;GD Muir;JD Steeves

  • Dose-dependent beneficial and detrimental effects of ROCK inhibitor Y27632 on axonal sprouting and functional recovery after rat spinal cord injury.

    Carmen C.M. Chan;Kourosh Khodarahmi;Jie Liu;Darren Sutherland

  • Setting the stage for functional repair of spinal cord injuries: a cast of thousands

    L M Ramer;M S Ramer;J D Steeves

  • Modulation of stretch reflexes during locomotion in the mesencephalic cat

    Unknown

  • Suppression of the onset of myelination extends the permissive period for the functional repair of embryonic spinal cord.

    Unknown

  • Sensorimotor stimulation to improve locomotor recovery after spinal cord injury

    Gillian D Muir;John D Steeves

  • Axotomy abolishes NeuN expression in facial but not rubrospinal neurons

    Lowell T. McPhail;Christopher B. McBride;John McGraw;John D. Steeves

  • International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury: cases with classification challenges.

    S. C. Kirshblum;F. Biering-Sørensen;R. Betz;S. Burns

  • Axonal Regeneration and Physiological Activity Following Transection and Immunological Disruption of Myelin within the Hatchling Chick Spinal Cord

    HS Keirstead;JK Dyer;GN Sholomenko;J McGraw

Frequent Co-Authors

Armin Curt
Armin Curt University of Zurich
Wolfram Tetzlaff
Wolfram Tetzlaff University of British Columbia
James W. Fawcett
James W. Fawcett University of Cambridge
Mark H. Tuszynski
Mark H. Tuszynski University of California, San Diego
Matt S. Ramer
Matt S. Ramer University of British Columbia
Andrei V. Krassioukov
Andrei V. Krassioukov University of British Columbia
Gregory D. Funk
Gregory D. Funk University of Alberta
Michael G. Fehlings
Michael G. Fehlings University of Toronto
Bruce H. Dobkin
Bruce H. Dobkin University of California, Los Angeles
Robert G. Grossman
Robert G. Grossman Houston Methodist

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience opens doors to many career paths, from academic research and medicine to roles in biotech or pharmaceuticals. When considering your educational journey, it's worth exploring flexible options like an accelerated bachelor's degree online. These programs can help you earn your degree faster, saving both time and money.

Career outcomes and earning potential are often key factors for students. Neuroscience and related STEM fields are consistently listed among the highest paying degrees. If maximizing your return on investment is important, you may also want to review other degrees that make the most money. This can help you compare how a neuroscience degree stacks up against similar majors.

Affordability is another critical consideration. Many universities in the USA offer fafsa-approved online certificate programs, making financial aid accessible to eligible students. Carefully evaluating your degree and financial aid options can help you build a successful career in neuroscience or related fields.

Best Scientists Citing John D. Steeves

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles