World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
70
Citations
27981
World Ranking
6860
National Ranking
3165

Mark Noble publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Noble sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 197 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mark Noble D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Noble sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Noble is affiliated with the University of Rochester in the United States. Their research spans key fields including Medicine and Neuroscience, with a particular focus on subfields such as Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Neurology, Epidemiology, and Immunology.

Their scientific contributions cover several main topics of study, notably:

  • Wound Healing and Treatments
  • Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Dermatologic Treatments and Research
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Immunotoxicology and immune responses
  • Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation

Mark Noble has authored multiple papers in prominent journals. Recent publications include:

  • "Drying Climates and Gendered Suffering: Links Between Drought, Food Insecurity, and Women's HIV in Less-Developed Countries," 2020, Social Indicators Research
  • "Erythropoietin promotes functional recovery in a mouse model of postoperative ileus," 2020, Neurogastroenterology & Motility
  • "Human equivalent dose of oral 4-aminopyridine differentiates nerve crush injury from transection injury and improves post-injury function in mice," 2020, Neural Regeneration Research
  • "4-Aminopyridine Induces Nerve Growth Factor to Improve Skin Wound Healing and Tissue Regeneration," 2022, Biomedicines
  • "Acute axon damage and demyelination are mitigated by 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) therapy after experimental traumatic brain injury," 2022, Acta Neuropathologica Communications

The venues where Mark Noble frequently publishes their research include:

  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Social Indicators Research
  • Neurogastroenterology & Motility
  • Biomedicines

They collaborate regularly with several researchers including:

  • John C. Elfar
  • Mashanipalya G. Jagadeeshaprasad
  • Prem Kumar Govindappa
  • Amanda M. Nelson
  • Kryslaine L. Radomski

Best Publications

  • A glial progenitor cell that develops in vitro into an astrocyte or an oligodendrocyte depending on culture medium

    Martin C. Raff;Robert H. Miller;Mark Noble

  • Cancer Stem Cells

    Craig T. Jordan;Monica L. Guzman;Mark Noble

  • Proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy unambiguously identifies different neural cell types

    Jutta Urenjak;Steve R. Williams;David G. Gadian;Mark Noble

  • Platelet-derived growth factor promotes division and motility and inhibits premature differentiation of the oligodendrocyte/type-2 astrocyte progenitor cell.

    Mark Noble;Kerren Murray;Paul Stroobant;Michael D. Waterfield

  • Development of oligodendrocytes and Schwann cells studied with a monoclonal antibody against galactocerebroside

    B Ranscht;P A Clapshaw;J Price;M Noble

  • Platelet-derived growth factor from astrocytes drives the clock that times oligodendrocyte development in culture.

    Martin C. Raff;Laura E. Lillien;William D. Richardson;Julia F. Burne

  • Two types of astrocytes in cultures of developing rat white matter: differences in morphology, surface gangliosides, and growth characteristics

    MC Raff;ER Abney;J Cohen;R Lindsay

  • Direct derivation of conditionally immortal cell lines from an H-2Kb-tsA58 transgenic mouse.

    Parmjit S. Jat;Mark D. Noble;Paris Ataliotis;Yujiro Tanaka

  • LIM-kinase1 Hemizygosity Implicated in Impaired Visuospatial Constructive Cognition

    J.Michael Frangiskakis;Amanda K Ewart;Colleen A Morris;Carolyn B Mervis

  • Cooperation between two growth factors promotes extended self-renewal and inhibits differentiation of oligodendrocyte-type-2 astrocyte (O-2A) progenitor cells.

    Oliver Bogler;Damian Wren;Susan C. Barnett;Hartmut Land

  • Specific expression of N-acetylaspartate in neurons, oligodendrocyte-type-2 astrocyte progenitors, and immature oligodendrocytes in vitro.

    Jutta Urenjak;Stephen R. Williams;David G. Gadian;Mark Noble

  • CNS progenitor cells and oligodendrocytes are targets of chemotherapeutic agents in vitro and in vivo

    Joerg Dietrich;Ruolan Han;Yin-Yin Yang;Margot Mayer-Pröschel

  • Identification of an adult-specific glial progenitor cell.

    G. Wolswijk;M. Noble

  • Evidence for migration of oligodendrocyte--type-2 astrocyte progenitor cells into the developing rat optic nerve.

    R. K. Small;P. Riddle;M. Noble;M. Noble

  • Redox state is a central modulator of the balance between self-renewal and differentiation in a dividing glial precursor cell

    Joel Smith;Ena Ladi;Margot Mayer-Pröschel;Mark Noble

  • Repair of demyelinated lesions by transplantation of purified O-2A progenitor cells

    A. K. Groves;S. C. Barnett;R. J. M. Franklin;A. J. Crang

  • Glia are a unique substrate for the in vitro growth of central nervous system neurons

    M. Noble;Juin Fok-Seang;J. Cohen

  • Purified astrocytes promote the in vitro division of a bipotential glial progenitor cell.

    M Noble;K Murray

  • N-acetyl-L-cysteine is a pluripotent protector against cell death and enhancer of trophic factor-mediated cell survival in vitro

    Margot Mayer;Mark Noble

  • ESTABLISHMENT OF CONDITIONALLY IMMORTALIZED EPITHELIAL-CELL LINES FROM BOTH COLON AND SMALL-INTESTINE OF ADULT H-2KB-TSA58 TRANSGENIC MICE

    R H Whitehead;P E VanEeden;M D Noble;P Ataliotis

Frequent Co-Authors

Margot Mayer-Pröschel
Margot Mayer-Pröschel University of Rochester
Parmjit S. Jat
Parmjit S. Jat University College London
Andrew K. Groves
Andrew K. Groves Baylor College of Medicine
Susan C. Barnett
Susan C. Barnett University of Glasgow
William F. Blakemore
William F. Blakemore University of Cambridge
Martin Raff
Martin Raff University College London
Hartmut Land
Hartmut Land University of Rochester Medical Center
Mahendra S. Rao
Mahendra S. Rao National Institutes of Health
Robin J.M. Franklin
Robin J.M. Franklin University of Cambridge
M. Eileen Dolan
M. Eileen Dolan University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to a diverse range of online degrees and healthcare careers. Many students interested in the life sciences later choose advanced business roles, such as pursuing online healthcare MBA programs, to gain leadership skills for healthcare organizations.

Another rewarding path is healthcare administration, especially in areas like medical billing and coding. Those who complete relevant training and certifications can explore various professional pathways. Determining the right credential can be confusing, so it can be helpful to compare the certified professional coder certification against others to see which matches your goals.

Understanding the certified medical coder salary range is essential, since salaries and roles may vary depending on certification, experience, and location. Job prospects remain stable and promising—review the medical billing and coding job outlook for more details about industry growth, advantages, and daily responsibilities.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Noble

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles