World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 40 7897 7589 355 332 82 13681

Diana Verseghy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Diana Verseghy between 1989 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Diana Verseghy published across 35 years, from 1989 to 2023, averaging 2.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2000. 5 of the 86 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2000. 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 5 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 4 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 5 publications
1989 2023

86 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Diana Verseghy: publications per year, 1989 to 2023
Year Publications
1989 2
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 4
1997 1
1998 5
1999 4
2000 13
2001 3
2002 6
2003 5
2004 4
2005 2
2006 5
2007 2
2008 2
2009 0
2010 1
2011 0
2012 0
2013 2
2014 1
2015 4
2016 3
2017 7
2018 0
2019 3
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 5
Total 86
Download as CSV

Diana Verseghy publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana Verseghy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 82 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361 82
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Diana Verseghy D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Diana Verseghy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321 40
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Diana Verseghy is affiliated with Environment and Climate Change Canada and contributes to research in the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their academic work focuses primarily on Global and Planetary Change as well as Atmospheric Science.

The scientist's research covers topics related to Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics, Climate variability and models, and Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations. These topics are reflected across their publications and collaborations.

Verseghy has contributed to the following paper:

  • The Canadian Atmospheric Model version 5 (CanAM5.0.3), 2023, Geoscientific model development

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Jason N. S. Cole
  • Knut von Salzen
  • Jiangnan Li
  • John Scinocca
  • David A. Plummer

Verseghy's work has appeared in the publication venue Geoscientific model development.

Best Publications

  • Regions of Strong Coupling Between Soil Moisture and Precipitation

    Randal D. Koster;Paul A. Dirmeyer;Zhichang Guo;Gordon Bonan

  • Class—A Canadian land surface scheme for GCMS. I. Soil model

    Diana L. Verseghy

  • GLACE: The Global Land-Atmosphere Coupling Experiment. Part I: Overview

    Randal D. Koster;Zhichang Guo;Paul A. Dirmeyer;Gordon Bonan

  • Class—A Canadian land surface scheme for GCMS, II. Vegetation model and coupled runs

    D. L. Verseghy;N. A. McFarlane;M. Lazare

  • Cabauw Experimental Results from the Project for Intercomparison of Land-Surface Parameterization Schemes

    T.H. Chen;A. Henderson-Sellers;P.C.D. Milly;A.J. Pitman

  • The Representation of Snow in Land Surface Schemes: Results from PILPS 2(d)

    A. G. Slater;A. G. Slater;C. A. Schlosser;C. E. Desborough;A. J. Pitman

  • The Canadian Fourth Generation Atmospheric Global Climate Model (CanAM4). Part I: Representation of Physical Processes

    Knut von Salzen;John F. Scinocca;Norman A. McFarlane;Jiangnan Li

  • Parametrization of Peatland Hydraulic Properties for the Canadian Land Surface Scheme

    Matthew G. Letts;Nigel T. Roulet;Neil T. Comer;Michael R. Skarupa

  • Soil Moisture Memory in AGCM Simulations: Analysis of Global Land–Atmosphere Coupling Experiment (GLACE) Data

    Sonia I. Seneviratne;Sonia I. Seneviratne;Randal D. Koster;Zhichang Guo;Paul A. Dirmeyer

  • Glace: The Global Land-Atmosphere Coupling Experiment Part 2: Analysis

    Zhichang Guo;Paul A. Dirmeyer;Randal D. Koster;Gordon Bonan

  • The Project for Intercomparison of Land-surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS) Phase 2(c) Red–Arkansas River basin experiment:: 1. Experiment description and summary intercomparisons

    Eric F. Wood;Dennis P. Lettenmaier;Xu Liang;Dag Lohmann

  • Validation of the energy budget of an alpine snowpack simulated by several snow models (SnowMIP project)

    Pierre Etchevers;Eric Martin;Ross Brown;Charles Fierz

  • The Canadian land surface scheme (CLASS): Its history and future

    Diana L. Verseghy

  • The Rhône-Aggregation Land Surface Scheme Intercomparison Project: An Overview

    Aaron A. Boone;F. Habets;J. Noilhan;D. Clark

  • Simulation of high-latitude hydrological processes in the Torne-Kalix basin: PILPS phase 2(e) - 1: Experiment description and summary intercomparisons

    Laura C. Bowling;Dennis P. Lettenmaier;Bart Nijssen;Bart Nijssen;L. Phil Graham

  • Eddy covariance measurements of evaporation from Great Slave Lake, Northwest Territories, Canada

    Peter D. Blanken;Wayne R. Rouse;Alistair D. Culf;Chris Spence

  • The Project for Intercomparison of Land-surface Parameterization Schemes (PILPS) phase 2(c) Red–Arkansas River basin experiment:: 3. Spatial and temporal analysis of water fluxes

    Dag Lohmann;Dennis P. Lettenmaier;Xu Liang;Eric F. Wood

  • Development of the MESH modelling system for hydrological ensemble forecasting of the Laurentian Great Lakes at the regional scale

    A. Pietroniro;V. Fortin;N. Kouwen;C. Neal

  • Modified snow algorithms in the Canadian land surface scheme: Model runs and sensitivity analysis at three boreal forest stands

    Paul A. Bartlett;Murray D. MacKay;Diana L. Verseghy

  • Snow Cover and Snow Mass Intercomparisons of General Circulation Models and Remotely Sensed Datasets

    James Foster;Glen Liston;Randy Koster;Richard Essery

Frequent Co-Authors

Ross Brown
Ross Brown Environment and Climate Change Canada
Zong-Liang Yang
Zong-Liang Yang The University of Texas at Austin
Laxmi Sushama
Laxmi Sushama McGill University
Richard Essery
Richard Essery University of Edinburgh
Yongjiu Dai
Yongjiu Dai Sun Yat-sen University
Eric F. Wood
Eric F. Wood Princeton University
Michael Ek
Michael Ek National Center for Atmospheric Research
Yongkang Xue
Yongkang Xue University of California, Los Angeles
Robert E. Dickinson
Robert E. Dickinson The University of Texas at Austin
Kenneth E. Mitchell
Kenneth E. Mitchell National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences can open multiple career pathways, but many students also consider complementary online programs to enhance their expertise. For those interested in academic leadership or advanced research, exploring best eds to edd programs can be a strategic choice. These programs offer a route to doctoral-level education, often with flexible online options.

Additionally, professionals focused on social impact within environmental contexts might find value in fully funded dsw programs, which provide financial support for doctoral studies in social work—a field closely related to environmental justice and community health.

For students balancing education with other commitments, an affordable online general studies degree can offer a flexible foundation while incorporating environmental coursework. Many also appreciate the option to pursue some of the easy bachelor degrees online, which can help expedite entry into the workforce or support career shifts into environmental fields without compromising quality.

By combining Environmental Sciences with related online programs, students can tailor their education to match evolving career goals and industry demands.

Best Scientists Citing Diana Verseghy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles