World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
34
Citations
3994
World Ranking
9368
National Ranking
3955

Maxwell M. Mozell publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maxwell M. Mozell sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 61 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Maxwell M. Mozell D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maxwell M. Mozell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maxwell M. Mozell was affiliated with SUNY Upstate Medical University in the United States. Their academic contributions and research activities were connected to this institution during their career.

Details about Maxwell M. Mozell's publications, including recent papers, were not recorded in the available data, and no records of frequent co-authors or venues where they published were provided. Similarly, information about their involvement in specific fields or subfields of study, as well as main topics covered in their work, was not listed.

There was no information regarding book publications by Maxwell M. Mozell or any awards received throughout their career. The scientist is noted as deceased, and this profile reflects their past contributions based on the available data.

Best Publications

  • A quantitative analysis of sniffing strategies in rats performing odor detection tasks.

    Steven L. Youngentob;Maxwell M. Mozell;Paul R. Sheehe;David E. Hornung

  • A Numerical Model of Nasal Odorant Transport for the Analysis of Human Olfaction

    Keyvan Keyhani;Peter W. Scherer;Maxwell M. Mozell

  • Chromatographic Separation of Odorants by the Nose: Retention Times Measured across in vivo Olfactory Mucosa

    Unknown

  • Evidence for a Chromatographic Model of Olfaction

    Unknown

  • The interaction of imposed and inherent olfactory mucosal activity patterns and their composite representation in a mammalian species using voltage-sensitive dyes.

    PF Kent;MM Mozell;SJ Murphy;DE Hornung

  • Evidence for Sorption as a Mechanism of the Olfactory Analysis of Vapours

    Unknown

  • Nasal chemoreception in flavor identification.

    Unknown

  • Quantitative stimulation of frog olfactory receptors.

    Unknown

  • A mass transport model of olfaction.

    Unknown

  • The Spatiotemporal Analysis of Odorants at the Level of the Olfactory Receptor Sheet

    Unknown

  • Airflow patterns in a human nasal model

    Hornung De;Leopold Da;Youngentob Sl;Sheehe Pr

  • Successful Treatment of Phantosmia With Preservation of Olfaction

    Donald A. Leopold;James E. Schwob;Steven L. Youngentob;David E. Hornung

  • Imposed and inherent mucosal activity patterns. Their composite representation of olfactory stimuli.

    Maxwell M. Mozell;Paul R. Sheehe;David E. Hornung;Paul F. Kent

  • Olfactory sensitivity: Is there laterality?

    S.L. Youngentob;D.B. Kurtz;D.A. Leopold;M.M. Mozell

  • Factors influencing the differential sorption of odorant molecules across the olfactory mucosa

    Unknown

  • A method for establishing a five odorant identification confusion matrix task in rats.

    Steven L. Youngentob;Lisa M. Markert;Maxwell M. Mozell;David E. Hornung

  • The recording of odorant-induced mucosal activity patterns with a voltage-sensitive dye.

    Unknown

  • Mucosal activity patterns as a basis for olfactory discrimination: comparing behavior and optical recordings.

    P. F. Kent;M. M. Mozell;Steven Youngentob;P. Yurco

  • Numerical modeling of odorant uptake in the rat nasal cavity.

    Unknown

  • Improvement of olfaction in laeyngectomized patients with the larynx bypass

    David N. Schwartz;Maxwell M. Mozell;Steven L. Youngentob;Donald L. Leopold

  • Effect of airway resistance on perceived odor intensity.

    Steven L. Youngentob;Neil M. Stern;Maxwell M. Mozell;Donald A. Leopold

  • Impact of left and right nostril olfactory abilities on binasal olfactory performance

    David E. Hornung;Donald A. Leopold;Maxwell M. Mozell;Paul R. Sheehe

  • Olfactory mucosa/air partitioning of odorants.

    David E. Hornung;Steven L. Youngentob;Maxwell M. Mozell

  • Determination of carbon dioxide detection thresholds in trained rats.

    Steven L. Youngentob;David E. Hornung;Maxwell M. Mozell

  • The afferent neural processes in odor perception.

    Maxwell M. Mozell;Carl Pfaffmann

  • Effect of Nasal Dilators on Perceived Odor Intensity

    David E. Hornung;Carol Chin;Daniel B. Kurtz;Paul F. Kent

  • Odorant identification in rats: An update

    Steven L. Youngentob;Lisa M. Markert;Thomas W. Hill;Edward P. Matyas

  • Initial mechanisms basic to olfactory perception

    Maxwell M. Mozell;David E. Hornung;Donald A. Leopold;Steven L. Youngentob

  • Odorant removal from the frog olfactory mucosa

    David E. Hornung;David E. Hornung;Maxwell M. Mozell;Maxwell M. Mozell

  • Spatial and Temporal Patterning

    Maxwell M. Mozell

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven L. Youngentob
Steven L. Youngentob University of Tennessee Health Science Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens doors to a variety of future pathways, many of which can be pursued or supported through online degrees. Those interested in applying neuroscience concepts in clinical settings might consider online PsyD programs, which prepare graduates for advanced practice in psychology fields.

Alternatively, if you’re passionate about mental health and family systems, marriage and family therapy online programs offer a focused curriculum that incorporates behavioral science and therapeutic techniques—skills that frequently intersect with neuroscience.

For students aiming to enter the workforce quickly, accelerated online programs provide an efficient path to graduation. These programs let you earn your degree faster, making it easier to start building experience or advance to graduate studies.

When planning your career, it’s also helpful to consider the highest paying bachelor degrees. A background in neuroscience can complement many of these lucrative fields, enhancing both earning potential and career flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Maxwell M. Mozell

Recently Published Articles