World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
66
Citations
54646
World Ranking
2247
National Ranking
127

Thore Graepel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thore Graepel sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 191 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Thore Graepel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thore Graepel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thore Graepel is affiliated with Altos Labs in the United States and works primarily in the field of Computer Science with a focus on Artificial Intelligence. Their research spans several subfields, including Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research, Economics and Econometrics, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The scientist has authored numerous papers, with significant contributions appearing in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Nature, Science Robotics, and Artificial Intelligence. Key recent papers include:

  • Learning a Generic Value-Selection Heuristic Inside a Constraint Programming Solver, 2023, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Cooperative AI: machines must learn to find common ground, 2021, Nature
  • From motor control to team play in simulated humanoid football, 2022, Science Robotics
  • Crowd IQ -- Aggregating Opinions to Boost Performance, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Negotiating team formation using deep reinforcement learning, 2020, Artificial Intelligence

The recurring topics in Thore Graepel's research address areas such as Reinforcement Learning in Robotics, Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies, Game Theory and Applications, Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation, Sports Analytics and Performance, Artificial Intelligence in Games, and Auction Theory and Applications.

  • Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Game Theory and Applications
  • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Sports Analytics and Performance
  • Artificial Intelligence in Games
  • Auction Theory and Applications

Frequent collaborators of Thore Graepel include Joel Z. Leibo, Karl Tuyls, Wojciech Marian Czarnecki, Yoram Bachrach, and Luke Marris. These relationships reflect ongoing joint work, particularly in topics bridging AI, multi-agent interactions, and learning strategies.

  • Joel Z. Leibo
  • Karl Tuyls
  • Wojciech Marian Czarnecki
  • Yoram Bachrach
  • Luke Marris

The publication record is dominated by contributions to arXiv (Cornell University) with 19 papers, supplemented by work in Zenodo, Nature, Science Robotics, and Artificial Intelligence. The scientist's work integrates AI methodologies with behavioral and economic models to explore computational approaches to decision-making and cooperation.

Best Publications

  • Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search

    David Silver;Aja Huang;Christopher J. Maddison;Arthur Guez

  • Mastering the game of Go without human knowledge

    David Silver;Julian Schrittwieser;Karen Simonyan;Ioannis Antonoglou

  • A general reinforcement learning algorithm that masters chess, shogi, and Go through self-play.

    David Silver;Thomas Hubert;Julian Schrittwieser;Ioannis Antonoglou

  • Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior

    Michal Kosinski;David Stillwell;Thore Graepel

  • Mastering Atari, Go, chess and shogi by planning with a learned model

    Julian Schrittwieser;Ioannis Antonoglou;Thomas Hubert;Karen Simonyan

  • Mastering Chess and Shogi by Self-Play with a General Reinforcement Learning Algorithm

    David Silver;Thomas Hubert;Julian Schrittwieser;Ioannis Antonoglou

  • TrueSkill™: A Bayesian Skill Rating System

    Ralf Herbrich;Tom Minka;Thore Graepel

  • Web-Scale Bayesian Click-Through rate Prediction for Sponsored Search Advertising in Microsoft's Bing Search Engine

    Thore Graepel;Joaquin Q. Candela;Thomas Borchert;Ralf Herbrich

  • Support vector learning for ordinal regression

    R. Herbrich;T. Graepel;K. Obermayer

  • Personality and patterns of Facebook usage

    Yoram Bachrach;Michal Kosinski;Thore Graepel;Pushmeet Kohli

  • Human-level performance in first-person multiplayer games with population-based deep reinforcement learning.

    Max Jaderberg;Wojciech M. Czarnecki;Iain Dunning;Luke Marris

  • ML confidential: machine learning on encrypted data

    Thore Graepel;Kristin Lauter;Michael Naehrig

  • Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learning

    Peter Sunehag;Guy Lever;Audrunas Gruslys;Wojciech Marian Czarnecki

  • Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning in Sequential Social Dilemmas

    Joel Z. Leibo;Vinicius Zambaldi;Marc Lanctot;Janusz Marecki

  • Human-level performance in 3D multiplayer games with population-based reinforcement learning

    Max Jaderberg;Wojciech M. Czarnecki;Iain Dunning;Luke Marris

  • Value-Decomposition Networks For Cooperative Multi-Agent Learning Based On Team Reward

    Peter Sunehag;Guy Lever;Audrunas Gruslys;Wojciech Marian Czarnecki

  • Manifestations of user personality in website choice and behaviour on online social networks

    Michal Kosinski;Yoram Bachrach;Pushmeet Kohli;David Stillwell

  • Gaussian process regression: active data selection and test point rejection

    Sambu Seo;M. Wallat;T. Graepel;K. Obermayer

  • Matchbox: large scale online bayesian recommendations

    David H. Stern;Ralf Herbrich;Thore Graepel

  • A Unified Game-Theoretic Approach to Multiagent Reinforcement Learning

    Marc Lanctot;Vinícius Flores Zambaldi;Audrunas Gruslys;Angeliki Lazaridou

  • Large Margin Rank Boundaries for Ordinal Regression

    Darren Gehring;Thore Graepel

Frequent Co-Authors

Ralf Herbrich
Ralf Herbrich Hasso Plattner Institute
Yoram Bachrach
Yoram Bachrach DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Karl Tuyls
Karl Tuyls DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Joel Z. Leibo
Joel Z. Leibo DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Marc Lanctot
Marc Lanctot DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Klaus Obermayer
Klaus Obermayer Technical University of Berlin
John Shawe-Taylor
John Shawe-Taylor University College London
David Silver
David Silver DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Andrew D. Gordon
Andrew D. Gordon Microsoft (United States)
Demis Hassabis
Demis Hassabis Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a diverse field with many specialized online degree options. Choosing a reputable program is crucial, so many students start by researching the best online accredited universities to ensure quality education and recognition by employers.

Beyond traditional computer science, related fields are rapidly growing. For creative tech enthusiasts, an online game design program can lead to exciting roles designing, developing, or testing new games and interactive media.

As cybersecurity threats increase worldwide, earning a cyber security online degree is a valuable pathway for those interested in digital protection and risk management across all industries.

Computer science skills are also in demand outside of IT-oriented sectors. A construction management degree blends technology and practical management—ideal for those aiming to lead technology-driven construction projects.

Exploring these online degrees allows you to tailor your education to your interests and career goals, all while benefiting from the flexibility and innovation that online learning offers.

Best Scientists Citing Thore Graepel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles