World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
73
Citations
18996
World Ranking
5938
National Ranking
99

Vera Rogiers publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vera Rogiers sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 545 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Vera Rogiers D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vera Rogiers sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Vera Rogiers is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium. The main field of their research is Medicine, with a specific focus on subfields including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Molecular Biology, Dermatology, Small Animals, and Epidemiology.

Their recent scientific contributions include papers addressing regulatory toxicology, cosmetics safety, liver injury, and risk assessment. Notable recent papers are:

  • "New approach methodologies in human regulatory toxicology - Not if, but how and when!" (2023) published in Environment International
  • "COVID-19 and drug-induced liver injury: a problem of plenty or a petty point?" (2020) published in Archives of Toxicology
  • "Paving the way for application of next generation risk assessment to safety decision-making for cosmetic ingredients" (2021) published in Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • "The way forward for assessing the human health safety of cosmetics in the EU - Workshop proceedings" (2020) published in Toxicology

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Vera Rogiers include:

  • Tamara Vanhaecke
  • Éric Gaffet
  • Laurent Bodin
  • Wolfgang Uter
  • E. Panteri

Vera Rogiers's publications appear predominantly in the following venues:

  • HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)
  • Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
  • Archives of Toxicology
  • Toxicology Letters
  • NAM journal.

Their work covers key topics such as:

  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Animal testing and alternatives
  • Contact dermatitis and allergies
  • Liver disease diagnosis and treatment
  • Carcinogens and genotoxicity assessment
  • Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Chemical safety and risk management

Vera Rogiers has also contributed substantially to multiple book publications, primarily produced by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. These works often provide scientific advice and opinions related to the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients and include detailed reports on substances such as titanium dioxide, benzophenone, and other chemical compounds used in cosmetics. These publications span from 2021 and are ongoing through 2025, reflecting continuing involvement in regulatory science and public health assessments.

Best Publications

  • Recent advances in 2D and 3D in vitro systems using primary hepatocytes, alternative hepatocyte sources and non-parenchymal liver cells and their use in investigating mechanisms of hepatotoxicity, cell signaling and ADME.

    Patricio Godoy;Nicola J. Hewitt;Ute Albrecht;Melvin E. Andersen

  • EEMCO Guidance for the Assessment of Transepidermal Water Loss in Cosmetic Sciences

    Vera Rogiers

  • Alternative (non-animal) methods for cosmetics testing: current status and future prospects—2010

    Sarah Adler;David Basketter;Stuart Creton;Olavi Pelkonen

  • Molecular Mechanisms Underlying the Dedifferentiation Process of Isolated Hepatocytes and Their Cultures

    Greetje Elaut;Tom Henkens;Peggy Papeleu;Sarah Snykers

  • In vitro differentiation of embryonic and adult stem cells into hepatocytes: state of the art

    Sarah Snykers;Joery De Kock;Vera Rogiers;Tamara Vanhaecke

  • Trichostatin A - like Hydroxamate Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors as Therapeutic Agents: Toxicological Point of View

    Tamara Vanhaecke;Peggy Papeleu;Greetje Elaut;Vera Rogiers

  • Connexins and their channels in cell growth and cell death

    Mathieu Vinken;Tamara Vanhaecke;Peggy Papeleu;Sarah Snykers

  • Selective inhibition of Cx43 hemichannels by Gap19 and its impact on myocardial ischemia/reperfusion injury.

    Nan Wang;Elke De Vuyst;Raf Ponsaerts;Kerstin Boengler

  • Connexin-related signaling in cell death: to live or let die?

    E Decrock;M Vinken;E De Vuyst;D V Krysko

  • Transforming growth factor-β gene expression in normal and fibrotic rat liver

    Pieter J. De Bleser;Toshiro Niki;Vera Rogiers;Albert Geerts

  • Sustained Serine Proteases Activity by Prolonged Increase in pH Leads to Degradation of Lipid Processing Enzymes and Profound Alterations of Barrier Function and Stratum Corneum Integrity

    Jean-Pierre Hachem;Jean-Pierre Hachem;Mao-Quiang Man;Debra Crumrine;Yoshikazu Uchida

  • Keratin 19: a key role player in the invasion of human hepatocellular carcinomas

    Olivier Govaere;Mina Komuta;Johannes Berkers;Bart Spee

  • A histone deacetylase inhibitor, trichostatin A, suppresses myofibroblastic differentiation of rat hepatic stellate cells in primary culture.

    Toshiro Niki;Krista Rombouts;Pieter De Bleser;Karen De Smet

  • Ca2+ regulation of connexin 43 hemichannels in C6 glioma and glial cells

    Elke De Vuyst;Nan Wang;Elke Decrock;Marijke De Bock

  • Paracrine signaling through plasma membrane hemichannels.

    Nan Wang;Marijke De Bock;Elke Decrock;Mélissa Bol

  • Connexin 43 hemichannels contribute to the propagation of apoptotic cell death in a rat C6 glioma cell model.

    E. Decrock;E. De Vuyst;M. Vinken;M. Van Moorhem

  • Glutathione levels discriminate between oxidative stress and transforming growth factor-beta signaling in activated rat hepatic stellate cells.

    Pieter J. De Bleser;Guoxiong Xu;Krista Rombouts;Vera Rogiers

  • EEMCO guidance for the in vivo assessment of skin greasiness

    Gérald E. Piérard;Claudine Piérard-Franchimont;R. Marks;M. Paye

  • Sequential Exposure to Cytokines Reflecting Embryogenesis: The Key for in vitro Differentiation of Adult Bone Marrow Stem Cells into Functional Hepatocyte-like Cells

    Sarah Snykers;Tamara Vanhaecke;Peggy Papeleu;Aernout Luttun

  • Validation of the VapoMeter, a closed unventilated chamber system to assess transepidermal water loss vs. the open chamber Tewameter.

    Kristien De Paepe;Evi Houben;Ralf Adam;Frank Wiesemann

Frequent Co-Authors

Mathieu Vinken
Mathieu Vinken Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Eric Gaffet
Eric Gaffet University of Lorraine
Corrado L. Galli
Corrado L. Galli University of Milan
Luc Leybaert
Luc Leybaert Ghent University
Wolfgang Uter
Wolfgang Uter University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Dirk Tourwé
Dirk Tourwé Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Elizabeth A. Shephard
Elizabeth A. Shephard University College London
Agapios Sachinidis
Agapios Sachinidis University of Cologne
Jos C. S. Kleinjans
Jos C. S. Kleinjans Maastricht University
Lajos Kemény
Lajos Kemény University of Szeged

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Vera Rogiers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles