World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
72
Citations
20066
World Ranking
1233
National Ranking
47

Jean-Dominique Lebreton publications per year

1980: 1 publications 1981: 1 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 1 publications 1987: 1 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 1 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 1 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 1 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publications
1980 2024

180 publications in total across all disciplines

Jean-Dominique Lebreton publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Dominique Lebreton sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 166 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Jean-Dominique Lebreton D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jean-Dominique Lebreton sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Member of Academia Europaea

Overview

Jean-Dominique Lebreton is affiliated with the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) in France. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science with a strong emphasis on ecology.

The main fields of study for Lebreton include:

  • Environmental Science

Their work touches on several subfields, including:

  • Ecology
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Genetics
  • Ecological Modeling

Key topics covered in their research are:

  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies
  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change

Lebreton has contributed to several peer-reviewed publications, including:

  • Life histories are not just fast or slow, 2024, Trends in Ecology & Evolution
  • Efficient use of harvest data: a size-class-structured integrated population model for exploited populations, 2021, Ecography
  • Building spaces of interactions between researchers and managers: Case studies with wildlife monitoring and conservation in France, 2023, Ecological Solutions and Evidence
  • Note sur la démographie pour une aide à la gestion et à la conservation des populations d'Oiseaux marins nicheurs du littoral français métropolitain, 2022, Naturae

The frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Lebreton include:

  • Marlène Gamelon
  • Jean-Michel Gaillard
  • Aurélien Besnard
  • Olivier Giménez
  • Iain Stott

Common venues for Lebreton's publications are:

  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution
  • Ecography
  • Ecological Solutions and Evidence
  • Naturae

In 2009, Lebreton was recognized as a Member of Academia Europaea.

Best Publications

  • Modeling Survival and Testing Biological Hypotheses Using Marked Animals: A Unified Approach with Case Studies

    Jean-Dominique Lebreton;Kenneth P. Burnham;Jean Clobert;David R. Anderson

  • U‐CARE: Utilities for performing goodness of fit tests and manipulating CApture–REcapture data

    Rémi Choquet;Jean-Dominique Lebreton;Olivier Gimenez;Anne-Marie Reboulet

  • Capture-recapture survival models taking account of transients

    Roger Pradel;James E. Hines;Jean-Dominique Lebreton;James D. Nichols

  • Multistate recapture models: Modelling incomplete individual histories

    Jean-Dominique Lebreton;Roger Pradel

  • An analysis of demographic tactics in birds and mammals

    J.-M. Gaillard;D. Pontier;D. Allainé;J. D. Lebreton

  • Modeling Individual Animal Histories with Multistate Capture–Recapture Models

    Jean‐Dominique Lebreton;James D. Nichols;Richard J. Barker;Roger Pradel

  • The compadre Plant Matrix Database: an open online repository for plant demography

    Roberto Salguero-Gómez;Roberto Salguero-Gómez;Roberto Salguero-Gómez;Owen R. Jones;C. Ruth Archer;Yvonne M. Buckley;Yvonne M. Buckley

  • Early survival in roe deer: causes and consequences of cohort variation in two contrasted populations

    Jean-Michel Gaillard;Jean-Marie Boutin;Daniel Delorme;Guy Van Laere

  • Bird population studies : relevance to conservation and management

    Unknown

  • Breeding avifauna of a Mediterranean succession: the holm oak and cork oak series in the eastern Pyrenees, 1. Analysis and modelling of the structure gradient.

    Roger Prodon;Jean-Dominique Lebreton

  • Generation time: a reliable metric to measure life-history variation among mammalian populations.

    Jean‐Michel Gaillard;Nigel G. Yoccoz;Jean‐Dominique Lebreton;Christophe Bonenfant

  • MIGRATING BIRDS STOP OVER LONGER THAN USUALLY THOUGHT: AN IMPROVED CAPTURE–RECAPTURE ANALYSIS

    Michael Schaub;Michael Schaub;Roger Pradel;Lukas Jenni;Jean-Dominique Lebreton

  • Estimation by capture-recapture of recruitment and dispersal over several sites

    Jean-Dominique Lebreton;J Hines;Roger Pradel;J Nichols

  • ESTIMATION OF CONTRIBUTIONS TO POPULATION GROWTH: A REVERSE-TIME CAPTURE???RECAPTURE APPROACH

    James D. Nichols;James E. Hines;Jean-Dominique Lebreton;Roger Pradel

  • Using Demographic Invariants to Detect Overharvested Bird Populations from Incomplete Data

    Colin Niel;Jean-Dominique Lebreton

  • Principles and interest of GOF tests for multistate capture-recapture models

    R. Pradel;O. Giménez;J.-D. Lebreton

  • The statistical analysis of survival in animal populations

    Jean-Dominique Lebreton;Roger Pradel;Jean Clobert

  • Data gaps and opportunities for comparative and conservation biology

    Dalia A Conde;Johanna Staerk;Johanna Staerk;Fernando Colchero;Rita da Silva

  • M-SURGE: new software specifically designed for multistate capture-recapture models

    R. Choquet;A.-M. Reboulet;R. Pradel;O. Giménez

  • The estimation of age-specific breeding probabilities from recaptures or resightings in vertebrate populations: II. Longitudinal models.

    Jean Clobert;Jean-Dominique Lebreton;Dominique Allaine;J. M. Gaillard

  • Changes in adult annual survival rates in a western European population of the White Stork Ciconia ciconia

    S. Kanyamibwa;A. Schierer;R. Pradel;J.D. Lebreton

  • Identifying functional groups for response to disturbance in an abandoned pasture.

    Sandra Lavorel;Blaise Touzard;Jean-Dominique Lebreton;Bernard Clément

  • Functional groups for response to disturbance in Mediterranean old fields

    Sandra Lavorel;Christelle Rochette;Jean-Dominique Lebreton

  • Small scale disturbances and the maintenance of species diversity in Mediterranean old fields

    Sandra Lavorel;Jacques Lepart;Max Debussche;Jean-Dominique Lebreton

Frequent Co-Authors

Roger Pradel
Roger Pradel University of Montpellier
Olivier Gimenez
Olivier Gimenez Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Jean-Michel Gaillard
Jean-Michel Gaillard Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
James D. Nichols
James D. Nichols United States Geological Survey
Byron J. T. Morgan
Byron J. T. Morgan University of Kent
Pierre-André Crochet
Pierre-André Crochet Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Gilles Gauthier
Gilles Gauthier Université Laval
Matthieu Guillemain
Matthieu Guillemain Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
James W. Vaupel
James W. Vaupel University of Southern Denmark
Aurélien Besnard
Aurélien Besnard Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution often leads students to consider diverse career options in healthcare, research, and education. Many fields now offer flexible online programs, making it easier to advance your education or change career paths without relocating.

For those interested in healthcare, there are asha accredited slpa programs available online. These programs help students meet essential licensure requirements while balancing work and family responsibilities. If you have a background in another field and wish to become a speech-language pathologist, options like the online speech-language pathology prerequisites program can help you fulfill entry requirements.

Nursing is also a growing area, and several accelerated nursing programs for non nurses online allow fast entry into the profession, even for those without previous nursing experience. Additionally, understanding salary expectations can help guide your career planning; for instance, reviewing psychiatric nurse practitioner salary data by state reveals earning potential in various regions.

No matter which path you choose, online degree options provide accessible and respected avenues toward careers in science, healthcare, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Jean-Dominique Lebreton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles