World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
38
Citations
4857
World Ranking
4456
National Ranking
125

Sanghamitra Nayak publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanghamitra Nayak sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 186 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Sanghamitra Nayak D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanghamitra Nayak sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Fungal disease detection in plants: Traditional assays, novel diagnostic techniques and biosensors.

    Monalisa Ray;Asit Ray;Swagatika Dash;Abtar Mishra

  • Gene pyramiding-a broad spectrum technique for developing durable stress resistance in crops.

    Raj Kumar Joshi;Sanghamitra Nayak

  • Antimicrobial assay of Stevia rebaudiana Bertoni leaf extracts against 10 pathogens

    Sumit Ghosh;Enketeswara Subudhi;Sanghamitra Nayak

  • In vitro multiplication and microrhizome induction in Curcuma aromatica Salisb.

    Sanghamitra Nayak

  • Evaluation of genetic diversity in turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) using RAPD and ISSR markers

    Shikha Singh;Manoj Kumar Panda;Sanghamitra Nayak

  • Chemical diversity, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of the essential oils from Indian populations of Hedychium coronarium Koen

    Asit Ray;Sudipta Jena;Biswabhusan Dash;Basudeba Kar

  • Phytochemical investigation and in vitro antioxidant activity of an indigenous medicinal plant Alpinia nigra B.L. Burtt

    Suprava Sahoo;Goutam Ghosh;Debajyoti Das;Sanghamitra Nayak

  • Isolation, Identification and Screening of Manganese Solubilizing Fungi From Low-Grade Manganese Ore Deposits

    S. Mohanty;S. Ghosh;S. Nayak;A. P. Das

  • Evaluation of the genetic variability in bamboo using RAPD markers

    S. Nayak;G.R. Rout;P. Das

  • Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of essential oil from leaves and rhizomes of Curcuma angustifolia Roxb

    Sudipta Jena;Asit Ray;Anwesha Banerjee;Ambika Sahoo

  • Assessment of genetic diversity among 16 promising cultivars of ginger using cytological and molecular markers.

    Sanghamitra Nayak;Pradeep K. Naik;Laxmikanta Acharya;Arup K. Mukherjee

  • In vitro plant regeneration from cotyledonary nodes of Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal and assessment of clonal fidelity using RAPD and ISSR markers

    Unknown

  • Plant regeneration from callus culture of Curcuma aromatica and in vitro detection of somaclonal variation through cytophotometric analysis

    S. Mohanty;M. K. Panda;E. Subudhi;S. Nayak

  • Assessment of genetic stability of micropropagated plants of Curcuma longa L. by cytophotometry and RAPD analyses

    Manoj Kumar Panda;Sujata Mohanty;Enketeswar Subudhi;Laxmikanta Acharya

  • Biotechnological intervention in betelvine (Piper betle L.): A review on recent advances and future prospects.

    Suryasnata Das;Reena Parida;I. Sriram Sandeep;Sanghamitra Nayak

  • Chemical Composition of Turmeric Oil (Curcuma longa L. cv. Roma) and its Antimicrobial Activity against Eye Infecting Pathogens

    Shikha Singh;Bhawani Sankar;Sathpathy Rajesh;Kumar Sahoo

  • Application of Artificial Neural Network modeling for optimization and prediction of essential oil yield in turmeric (Curcuma longa L.)

    Abdul Akbar;Ananya Kuanar;Jeetendranath Patnaik;Antaryami Mishra

  • Molecular Identification of Acidophilic Manganese (Mn)-Solubilizing Bacteria from Mining Effluents and Their Application in Mineral Beneficiation

    A. S. Sanket;S. Ghosh;R. Sahoo;S. Nayak

  • Molecular identification of indigenous manganese solubilising bacterial biodiversity from manganese mining deposits.

    Shreya Ghosh;Sansuta Mohanty;Sanghamitra Nayak;Lala B. Sukla

  • Biochemical and molecular profiling of micropropagated and conventionally grown Kaempferia galanga

    Sujata Mohanty;Reena Parida;Sikha Singh;Raj Kumar Joshi

  • Micropropagation of Zingiber rubens and assessment of genetic stability through RAPD and ISSR markers

    S. Mohanty;M. K. Panda;S. Sahoo;S. Nayak

  • Perspectives of genomic diversification and molecular recombination towards R-gene evolution in plants

    Raj Kumar Joshi;Sanghamitra Nayak

  • Detection and Evaluation of Genetic Variation in 17 Promising Cultivars of Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) Using 4C Nuclear DNA Content and RAPD Markers

    Sanghamitra Nayak;Pradeep Kumar Naik;Laxmi Kanta Acharya;Ajaya Kumar Pattnaik

  • Evaluation of yield, quality and antioxidant activity of essential oil of in vitro propagated Kaempferia galanga Linn.

    Suprava Sahoo;Reena Parida;Sikha Singh;Rabindra N. Padhy

  • Factors Effecting In Vitro Microrhizome Formation and Growth in Curcuma longa L. and Improved Field Performance of Micropropagated Plants

    Sanghamitra Nayak;Pradeep Kumar Naik

Frequent Co-Authors

Neelam S. Sangwan
Neelam S. Sangwan Central University of Haryana

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Sanghamitra Nayak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles