World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
79895
World Ranking
7153
National Ranking
3758

Donald E. Cutlip publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald E. Cutlip sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 381 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Donald E. Cutlip D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donald E. Cutlip sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Donald E. Cutlip is affiliated with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in the United States and specializes in fields related to medicine, particularly cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

The scientist's body of work encompasses main fields of study such as:

  • Medicine

With a significant focus on subfields including:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Biomedical Engineering

Their research topics cover areas such as:

  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
  • JACC Heart Failure

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Donald E. Cutlip are:

  • Definitions and Clinical Trial Design Principles for Coronary Artery Chronic Total Occlusion Therapies: CTO-ARC Consensus Recommendations, 2021, Circulation
  • Standardized Definitions for Cardiogenic Shock Research and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices: Scientific Expert Panel From the Shock Academic Research Consortium (SHARC), 2023, Circulation
  • Ultrathin Bioresorbable-Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin Durable-Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Coronary Revascularization, 2020, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations, 2022, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Trial Design Principles for Patients at High Bleeding Risk Undergoing PCI, 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Frequent coauthors working with Donald E. Cutlip include:

  • Roxana Mehran
  • Jan Komtebedde
  • Martin B. Leon
  • Maja Čikeš
  • Mitchell W. Krucoff

Best Publications

  • Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials A Case for Standardized Definitions

    Donald E. Cutlip;Stephan Windecker;Roxana Mehran;Ashley Boam

  • Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document.

    A. Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza

  • Standardized Bleeding Definitions for Cardiovascular Clinical Trials A Consensus Report From the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium

    Roxana Mehran;Sunil V. Rao;Deepak L. Bhatt;C. Michael Gibson

  • Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid-Artery Stenosis

    Thomas G. Brott;Thomas G. Brott;Robert W. Hobson;George Howard;Gary S. Roubin

  • Protected Carotid-Artery Stenting versus Endarterectomy in High-Risk Patients

    Jay S. Yadav;Mark H. Wholey;Richard E. Kuntz;Pierre B Fayad

  • A Clinical Trial Comparing Three Antithrombotic-Drug Regimens After Coronary Artery Stenting

    Martin B. Leon;Donald S. Baim;Jeffrey J. Popma;Paul C. Gordon

  • Safety and efficacy of sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents

    Gregg W. Stone;Jeffrey W. Moses;Stephen G. Ellis;Joachim Schofer

  • Updated Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

    A. Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza

  • Twelve or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents.

    Laura Mauri;Dean J. Kereiakes;Robert W. Yeh;Priscilla Driscoll-Shempp

  • Stent thrombosis in randomized clinical trials of drug-eluting stents

    Laura Mauri;Wen-hua Hsieh;Joseph M Massaro;Kalon K L Ho

  • Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Clinical Trials : A Consensus Report From the Valve Academic Research Consortium

    Martin B Leon;Nicolo Piazza;Eugenia Nikolsky;Eugene H. Blackstone

  • Defining High Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention : A Consensus Document From the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk

    Philip Urban;Roxana Mehran;Roisin Colleran;Dominick J. Angiolillo

  • Stent Thrombosis in the Modern Era A Pooled Analysis of Multicenter Coronary Stent Clinical Trials

    Donald E. Cutlip;Donald S. Baim;Kalon K. L. Ho;Jeffrey J. Popma

  • Stenting and medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis

    Christopher J. Cooper;Timothy P. Murphy;Donald E. Cutlip;Kenneth Jamerson

  • Everolimus-Eluting versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Coronary Artery Disease

    Gregg W. Stone;Ali Rizvi;William Newman;Kourosh Mastali

  • Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.

    Hitinder S. Gurm;Jay S. Yadav;Pierre B Fayad;Barry T. Katzen

  • Standardized Endpoint Definitions for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Clinical Trials

    Martin B. Leon;Nicolo Piazza;Eugenia Nikolsky;Eugene H. Blackstone

  • A Pooled Analysis of Data Comparing Sirolimus-Eluting Stents with Bare-Metal Stents

    Christian Spaulding;Joost Daemen;Eric Boersma;Donald E. Cutlip

  • Randomized Trial of a Distal Embolic Protection Device During Percutaneous Intervention of Saphenous Vein Aorto-Coronary Bypass Grafts

    Donald S. Baim;Dennis Wahr;Barry George;Martin B. Leon

  • Development and Validation of a Prediction Rule for Benefit and Harm of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Beyond 1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

    Robert W. Yeh;Robert W. Yeh;Eric A. Secemsky;Dean J. Kereiakes;Sharon-Lise T. Normand

Frequent Co-Authors

Laura Mauri
Laura Mauri University of Milan
Richard E. Kuntz
Richard E. Kuntz Brigham and Women's Hospital
Jeffrey J. Popma
Jeffrey J. Popma Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Joseph M. Massaro
Joseph M. Massaro Boston University
David J. Cohen
David J. Cohen University of Missouri–Kansas City
Dean J. Kereiakes
Dean J. Kereiakes The Christ Hospital Health Network
Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center
Roxana Mehran
Roxana Mehran Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Mitchell W. Krucoff
Mitchell W. Krucoff Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering Medicine in the USA, exploring related online degrees and alternative career pathways can be a smart move. Flexible online programs make it easier for working professionals and aspiring healthcare leaders to upskill without relocating or pausing their careers.

If you are interested in healthcare leadership or hospital administration, the cheapest online mha programs offer accessible entry points. For those seeking the highest level of nursing practice, the cheapest dnp online programs provide an affordable way to achieve this advanced credential.

Pharmacy remains a critical healthcare field, and pursuing an online pharmacist degree can open new professional opportunities. Similarly, the demand for health IT experts is rising—earning a bachelor of health information management online supports evolving careers in health data, records management, and informatics.

Online degrees offer flexibility, affordability, and access to various healthcare careers—all important for those mapping alternative routes to medicine or aiming to specialize further within the medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Donald E. Cutlip

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles