World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
146
Citations
117598
World Ranking
1313
National Ranking
757

David J. Cohen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Cohen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 849 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David J. Cohen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Cohen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 146 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David J. Cohen is affiliated with the University of Missouri-Kansas City in the United States. Their research contributions fall predominantly within the field of Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Other areas of their work include Surgery, Epidemiology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, as well as Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their research covers various topics with a focus on cardiovascular health and treatments. Key subjects include:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes

They have frequently published in the following venues:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Circulation
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research," 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "STS-ACC TVT Registry of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement," 2020, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • "Five-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement," 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research," 2020, European Heart Journal
  • "Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement in Low-Risk Patients at Five Years," 2023, New England Journal of Medicine

David J. Cohen has collaborated extensively with several coauthors, including:

  • Michael J. Mack
  • Martin B. Leon
  • Suzanne V. Arnold
  • Vinod H. Thourani
  • Samir Kapadia

Best Publications

  • Clinical End Points in Coronary Stent Trials A Case for Standardized Definitions

    Donald E. Cutlip;Stephan Windecker;Roxana Mehran;Ashley Boam

  • Updated standardized endpoint definitions for transcatheter aortic valve implantation: the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 consensus document.

    A. Pieter Kappetein;Stuart J. Head;Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza

  • Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke

    Jeffrey L. Saver;Mayank Goyal;Alain Bonafe;Hans Christoph Diener

  • Transcatheter or Surgical Aortic-Valve Replacement in Intermediate-Risk Patients.

    Martin B Leon;Craig R. Smith;Michael J. Mack;Michael J. Mack;Rajendra Makkar

  • Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement with a Balloon-Expandable Valve in Low-Risk Patients

    Michael J. Mack;Martin B. Leon;Vinod H. Thourani;Raj Makkar

  • Stenting versus Endarterectomy for Treatment of Carotid-Artery Stenosis

    Thomas G. Brott;Thomas G. Brott;Robert W. Hobson;George Howard;Gary S. Roubin

  • Transcatheter Mitral-Valve Repair in Patients with Heart Failure.

    Gregg W. Stone;JoAnn Lindenfeld;William T. Abraham;Saibal Kar

  • Strategies for Multivessel Revascularization in Patients with Diabetes

    Michael E. Farkouh;Michael Domanski;Lynn A. Sleeper;Flora S. Siami

  • Twelve or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents.

    Laura Mauri;Dean J. Kereiakes;Robert W. Yeh;Priscilla Driscoll-Shempp

  • Terminal Complement Inhibitor Eculizumab in Atypical Hemolytic–Uremic Syndrome

    C.M. Legendre;C. Licht;P. Muus;L.A. Greenbaum

  • Bivalirudin and Provisional Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade Compared With Heparin and Planned Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Blockade During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: REPLACE-2 Randomized Trial

    A. Michael Lincoff;John A. Bittl;Robert A. Harrington;Frederick Feit

  • State-transition modeling: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force--3.

    Uwe Siebert;Uwe Siebert;Oguzhan Alagoz;Ahmed M. Bayoumi;Beate Jahn

  • Stent Thrombosis in the Modern Era A Pooled Analysis of Multicenter Coronary Stent Clinical Trials

    Donald E. Cutlip;Donald S. Baim;Kalon K. L. Ho;Jeffrey J. Popma

  • Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: Updated Endpoint Definitions for Aortic Valve Clinical Research.

    Philippe Généreux;Nicolo Piazza;Maria C. Alu

  • Prevalence, Predictors, and Outcomes of Premature Discontinuation of Thienopyridine Therapy After Drug-Eluting Stent Placement: Results From the PREMIER Registry

    John A. Spertus;Richard Kettelkamp;Clifton Vance;Carole Decker

  • Transcatheter aortic valve replacement versus surgical valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients: a propensity score analysis

    Vinod H. Thourani;Susheel Kodali;Raj R. Makkar;Howard C. Herrmann

  • Stenting and medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis

    Christopher J. Cooper;Timothy P. Murphy;Donald E. Cutlip;Kenneth Jamerson

  • Dual Action of Neutrophil Gelatinase–Associated Lipocalin

    Kai M. Schmidt-Ott;Kiyoshi Mori;Jau Yi Li;Avtandil Kalandadze

  • Development and Validation of a Prediction Rule for Benefit and Harm of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Beyond 1 Year After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

    Robert W. Yeh;Robert W. Yeh;Eric A. Secemsky;Dean J. Kereiakes;Sharon-Lise T. Normand

  • Comparison of two platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, tirofiban and abciximab, for the prevention of ischemic events with percutaneous coronary revascularization.

    E J Topol;D J Moliterno;H C Herrmann;E R Powers

Frequent Co-Authors

John A. Spertus
John A. Spertus University of Missouri–Kansas City
Donald E. Cutlip
Donald E. Cutlip Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Richard E. Kuntz
Richard E. Kuntz Brigham and Women's Hospital
Matthew R. Reynolds
Matthew R. Reynolds Tufts University
Michael J. Mack
Michael J. Mack Scott & White Memorial Hospital
Roxana Mehran
Roxana Mehran Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Laura Mauri
Laura Mauri University of Milan
Donald S. Baim
Donald S. Baim Harvard University
Eric D. Peterson
Eric D. Peterson The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
C. Michael Gibson
C. Michael Gibson Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online healthcare degrees provides a flexible route for those interested in the medical field but not pursuing traditional MD programs. For example, many students start their careers with lpn online programs, which offer a streamlined path to become a Licensed Practical Nurse. These programs are ideal for those seeking swift entry into patient care.

For those aiming for advanced practice roles, pmhnp online programs can prepare graduates to serve as Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioners, a highly in-demand specialty. These programs emphasize mental health assessment and care, offering a vital service to communities.

If your interests lean toward healthcare leadership rather than direct patient care, consider pursuing administrative degrees. The cheapest mha programs online allow students to gain crucial management skills while balancing work and study. This can be further explored with the cheapest mha programs online healthcare options, which provide affordable pathways to a Master’s in Healthcare Administration.

Each of these online programs offers flexibility, cost savings, and new career opportunities within the U.S. healthcare system.

Best Scientists Citing David J. Cohen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles