World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
13245
World Ranking
8603
National Ranking
3687

Alec Wolman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alec Wolman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 93 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Alec Wolman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alec Wolman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - ACM Fellow For contributions to trusted mobile systems and services
  • 2010 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Alec Wolman is a researcher affiliated with Microsoft in the United States. Their academic work focuses primarily on computer science, with significant contributions to subfields including artificial intelligence, hardware and architecture, and signal processing.

The scientist's research prominently covers topics such as security and verification in computing, physical unclonable functions (PUFs) and hardware security, cryptographic implementations and security, and advanced malware detection techniques.

Recent publications by Alec Wolman include:

  • The Price of Secrecy: How Hiding Internal DRAM Topologies Hurts Rowhammer Defenses, 2022, 2022 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS)
  • Are We Susceptible to Rowhammer? An End-to-End Methodology for Cloud Providers, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Among frequent co-authors collaborating with Wolman are:

  • Stefan Saroiu
  • Lucian Cojocar
  • Jeremie Kim
  • Minesh Patel
  • Lillian L. Tsai

The venues where Wolman has published include:

  • 2022 IEEE International Reliability Physics Symposium (IRPS)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Alec Wolman has been recognized with awards such as the ACM Fellow in 2018, awarded for contributions to trusted mobile systems and services, and the ACM Distinguished Member in 2010.

Best Publications

  • MAUI: making smartphones last longer with code offload

    Eduardo Cuervo;Aruna Balasubramanian;Dae-ki Cho;Alec Wolman

  • A multi-radio unification protocol for IEEE 802.11 wireless networks

    A. Adya;P. Bahl;J. Padhye;A. Wolman

  • SkipNet: a scalable overlay network with practical locality properties

    Nicholas J. A. Harvey;Michael B. Jones;Stefan Saroiu;Marvin Theimer

  • On the scale and performance of cooperative Web proxy caching

    Alec Wolman;M. Voelker;Nitin Sharma;Neal Cardwell

  • Volley: automated data placement for geo-distributed cloud services

    Sharad Agarwal;John Dunagan;Navendu Jain;Stefan Saroiu

  • Reconsidering wireless systems with multiple radios

    Paramvir Bahl;Atul Adya;Jitendra Padhye;Alec Wolman

  • Measurement and analysis of a streaming-media workload

    Maureen Chesire;Alec Wolman;Geoffrey M. Voelker;Henry M. Levy

  • An evaluation of scalable application-level multicast built using peer-to-peer overlays

    M. Castro;M. B. Jones;A.-M. Kermarrec;A. Rowstron

  • MCDNN: An Approximation-Based Execution Framework for Deep Stream Processing Under Resource Constraints

    Seungyeop Han;Haichen Shen;Matthai Philipose;Sharad Agarwal

  • Enabling new mobile applications with location proofs

    Stefan Saroiu;Alec Wolman

  • Instrumentation and optimization of Win32/intel executables using Etch

    Ted Romer;Geoff Voelker;Dennis Lee;Alec Wolman

  • Wireless wakeups revisited: energy management for voip over wi-fi smartphones

    Yuvraj Agarwal;Ranveer Chandra;Alec Wolman;Paramvir Bahl

  • I am a sensor, and I approve this message

    Stefan Saroiu;Alec Wolman

  • Using ARM trustzone to build a trusted language runtime for mobile applications

    Nuno Santos;Himanshu Raj;Stefan Saroiu;Alec Wolman

  • Designing high performance enterprise Wi-Fi networks

    Rohan Murty;Jitendra Padhye;Ranveer Chandra;Alec Wolman

  • Lockr: better privacy for social networks

    Amin Tootoonchian;Stefan Saroiu;Yashar Ganjali;Alec Wolman

  • Outatime: Using Speculation to Enable Low-Latency Continuous Interaction for Mobile Cloud Gaming

    Kyungmin Lee;David Chu;Eduardo Cuervo;Johannes Kopf

  • Enhancing the security of corporate Wi-Fi networks using DAIR

    Paramvir Bahl;Ranveer Chandra;Jitendra Padhye;Lenin Ravindranath

  • Virtual compass: relative positioning to sense mobile social interactions

    Nilanjan Banerjee;Sharad Agarwal;Paramvir Bahl;Ranveer Chandra

  • The structure and performance of interpreters

    Theodore H. Romer;Dennis Lee;Geoffrey M. Voelker;Alec Wolman

  • A multi-radio unification protocol for ieee 802

    Atul Adya;Paramvir Bahl;Jitendra Padhye;Alec Wolman

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Saroiu
Stefan Saroiu Microsoft (United States)
Jitendra Padhye
Jitendra Padhye Microsoft (United States)
Paramvir Bahl
Paramvir Bahl Microsoft (United States)
Ranveer Chandra
Ranveer Chandra Microsoft (United States)
Marvin M. Theimer
Marvin M. Theimer Microsoft (United States)
Henry M. Levy
Henry M. Levy University of Washington
John Dunagan
John Dunagan Microsoft (United States)
Sharad Agarwal
Sharad Agarwal Microsoft (United States)
Jason Flinn
Jason Flinn Facebook (United States)
Atul Adya
Atul Adya Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternatives to traditional on-campus degrees is increasingly popular, especially for those balancing work, family, or other responsibilities. An online associate's degree in computer science is a flexible starting point. It can equip you with foundational programming and technology skills and may be completed in just two years or less.

For cost-conscious learners, finding the most affordable online colleges is crucial. These institutions offer quality education at lower tuition rates, which can make a significant difference in minimizing student debt.

If your high school or prior college GPA isn’t very strong, don’t be discouraged. There are still plenty of options among the best colleges for low gpa, many of which provide robust online degree programs in computer science and related fields.

Beyond computer science, interdisciplinary education opens new doors. Curious about broader job opportunities? Discover what can you get with an environmental science degree and widen your perspective on career pathways in technology, sustainability, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Alec Wolman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles