World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
64
Citations
25204
World Ranking
9444
National Ranking
39

Mohit Kumar Jolly publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohit Kumar Jolly sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 337 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mohit Kumar Jolly D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohit Kumar Jolly sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mohit Kumar Jolly is affiliated with the Indian Institute of Science in India and has contributed extensively to the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Their research spans various subfields including Molecular Biology, Oncology, Cancer Research, Cell Biology, and Modeling and Simulation.

Their work frequently addresses complex topics such as Cancer Cells and Metastasis, Gene Regulatory Network Analysis, Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics, Single-cell and Spatial Transcriptomics, Mathematical Biology Tumor Growth, Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks, and Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism.

They have published in notable venues with multiple contributions in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • iScience
  • Preprints.org
  • Translational Oncology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Some of the recent papers by Mohit Kumar Jolly include:

  • Identification of EMT signaling cross-talk and gene regulatory networks by single-cell RNA sequencing, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Hypoxia, partial EMT and collective migration: Emerging culprits in metastasis, 2020, Translational Oncology
  • Cancer Stem Cell Plasticity - A Deadly Deal, 2020, Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
  • ZEB1: A Critical Regulator of Cell Plasticity, DNA Damage Response, and Therapy Resistance, 2020, Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
  • Decoding leader cells in collective cancer invasion, 2021, Nature reviews. Cancer

Mohit Kumar Jolly collaborates regularly with several coauthors, including:

  • Sarthak Sahoo
  • Kishore Hari
  • Herbert Levine
  • Priyanka Chakraborty
  • Ayalur Raghu Subbalakshmi

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Implications of the Hybrid Epithelial/Mesenchymal Phenotype in Metastasis

    Mohit Kumar Jolly;Marcelo Boareto;Marcelo Boareto;Bin Huang;Dongya Jia

  • MicroRNA-based regulation of epithelial-hybrid-mesenchymal fate determination.

    Mingyang Lu;Mohit Kumar Jolly;Herbert Levine;José N. Onuchic

  • Tumor Budding: The Name is EMT. Partial EMT.

    Alexandru Dan Grigore;Mohit Kumar Jolly;Dongya Jia;Mary C. Farach-Carson

  • Stability of the hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal phenotype

    Mohit Kumar Jolly;Satyendra Chandra Tripathi;Dongya Jia;Steven M. Mooney

  • EMT and MET: necessary or permissive for metastasis?

    Mohit Kumar Jolly;Kathryn E. Ware;Shivee Gilja;Jason A. Somarelli

  • Implications of the hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal phenotype in metastasis

    Mohit Kumar Jolly;Marcelo Boareto;Bin Huang;Dongya Jia

  • Hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal phenotypes promote metastasis and therapy resistance across carcinomas.

    Mohit Kumar Jolly;Jason A. Somarelli;Maya Sheth;Adrian Biddle

  • Toward understanding cancer stem cell heterogeneity in the tumor microenvironment.

    Federico Bocci;Larisa Gearhart-Serna;Marcelo Boareto;Mariana Ribeiro

  • Survival Outcomes in Cancer Patients Predicted by a Partial EMT Gene Expression Scoring Metric.

    Jason T. George;Jason T. George;Mohit Kumar Jolly;Shengnan Xu;Jason A. Somarelli

  • Epithelial–mesenchymal transition, a spectrum of states: Role in lung development, homeostasis, and disease

    Mohit Kumar Jolly;Chris Ward;Mathew Suji Eapen;Stephen Myers

  • Towards elucidating the connection between epithelial-mesenchymal transitions and stemness.

    Mohit Kumar Jolly;Bin Huang;Mingyang Lu;Sendurai A. Mani

  • Acute vs. Chronic vs. Cyclic Hypoxia: Their Differential Dynamics, Molecular Mechanisms, and Effects on Tumor Progression.

    Kritika Saxena;Mohit Kumar Jolly

  • Identification of EMT signaling cross-talk and gene regulatory networks by single-cell RNA sequencing

    Abhijeet P Deshmukh;Suhas V Vasaikar;Katarzyna Tomczak;Shubham Tripathi

  • Immunoproteasome deficiency is a feature of non-small cell lung cancer with a mesenchymal phenotype and is associated with a poor outcome

    Satyendra C. Tripathi;Haley L. Peters;Ayumu Taguchi;Hiroyuki Katayama

  • Coupling the modules of EMT and stemness: A tunable ‘stemness window’ model

    Mohit Kumar Jolly;Dongya Jia;Marcelo Boareto;Marcelo Boareto;Sendurai A. Mani

  • Jagged-Delta asymmetry in Notch signaling can give rise to a Sender/Receiver hybrid phenotype.

    Marcelo Boareto;Marcelo Boareto;Mohit Kumar Jolly;Mingyang Lu;José N. Onuchic

  • Hypoxia, partial EMT and collective migration: Emerging culprits in metastasis.

    Kritika Saxena;Mohit Kumar Jolly;Kuppusamy Balamurugan

  • Phenotypic Plasticity, Bet-Hedging, and Androgen Independence in Prostate Cancer: Role of Non-Genetic Heterogeneity.

    Mohit Kumar Jolly;Prakash Kulkarni;Keith Weninger;John Orban

  • Notch-Jagged signalling can give rise to clusters of cells exhibiting a hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal phenotype.

    Marcelo Boareto;Mohit Kumar Jolly;Aaron Goldman;Mika Pietilä

Frequent Co-Authors

Herbert Levine
Herbert Levine Northeastern University
José N. Onuchic
José N. Onuchic Rice University
Samir M. Hanash
Samir M. Hanash The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Ravi Salgia
Ravi Salgia City Of Hope National Medical Center
Sendurai A. Mani
Sendurai A. Mani Brown University
Wendy A. Woodward
Wendy A. Woodward The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Mary C. Farach-Carson
Mary C. Farach-Carson The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Vladimir N. Uversky
Vladimir N. Uversky University of South Florida
Kenneth J. Pienta
Kenneth J. Pienta Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Alexander Swarbrick
Alexander Swarbrick Garvan Institute of Medical Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Biology or Biochemistry opens doors to a wide range of careers in healthcare, research, and beyond. Many students consider online degree options to accelerate their education or balance their studies with work. For those looking to transition into nursing with a science background, the easiest rn to bsn online program can provide a streamlined path to becoming a registered nurse, building on your foundational science knowledge.

Other career-focused online degrees include a degree in healthcare management, ideal for those interested in the administrative and leadership side of healthcare. If you’re passionate about mental health, consider specialized programs like the accelerated msn psychiatric np programs, which prepare graduates for advanced practice roles and provide strong job prospects.

Nutrition is another fast-growing field connected to biology. Aspiring nutritionists can check out the accelerated nutrition degree online for quick, flexible routes into nutrition science or dietetics. With so many online options, there’s an ideal pathway for every science enthusiast looking to turn their passion into a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Mohit Kumar Jolly

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles