World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
20032
World Ranking
18127
National Ranking
250

Jan Tesarik publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Tesarik sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 312 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jan Tesarik D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan Tesarik sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jan Tesarik is affiliated with the University of Granada in Spain and has established a research profile primarily within the field of Medicine. Their scholarly work focuses predominantly on Reproductive Medicine, encompassing related subfields such as Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Immunology.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas related to reproductive health and biology. Key topics include:

  • Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Ovarian function and disorders
  • Gynecological conditions and treatments
  • Reproductive System and Pregnancy
  • Endometriosis Research and Treatment
  • Sperm and Testicular Function
  • Circadian rhythm and melatonin

Jan Tesarik has contributed multiple publications to various scientific journals, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Reproductive BioMedicine Online
  • Preprints.org
  • Frontiers in Endocrinology
  • International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

Among their recent papers are the following:

  • "Ovarian Aging: Molecular Mechanisms and Medical Management," 2021, published in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • "From hysteroscopy to laparoendoscopic surgery: what is the best surgical approach for symptomatic isthmocele? A systematic review and meta-analysis," 2020, published in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
  • "Risk of endometrial cancer in asymptomatic postmenopausal women in relation to ultrasonographic endometrial thickness: systematic review and diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis," 2022, published in American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • "Assessing the testicular sperm microbiome: a low-biomass site with abundant contamination," 2021, published in Reproductive BioMedicine Online
  • "Management of anxiety and pain perception in women undergoing office hysteroscopy: a systematic review," 2020, published in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics

Collaboration plays a significant role in their research, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Raquel Mendoza-Tesarik
  • Salvatore Giovanni Vitale
  • José Carugno
  • Pasquale De Franciscis
  • Raquel Mendoza Tesarik

Best Publications

  • The probability of abnormal preimplantation development can be predicted by a single static observation on pronuclear stage morphology

    Jan Tesarik;Ermanno Greco

  • Reduction of the Incidence of Sperm DNA Fragmentation by Oral Antioxidant Treatment

    Ermanno Greco;Marcello Iacobelli;Laura Rienzi;Filippo Ubaldi

  • Late, but not early, paternal effect on human embryo development is related to sperm DNA fragmentation

    Jan Tesarik;Ermanno Greco;Carmen Mendoza

  • Efficient treatment of infertility due to sperm DNA damage by ICSI with testicular spermatozoa

    Ermanno Greco;Filomena Scarselli;Marcello Iacobelli;Laura Rienzi

  • Viable embryos from injection of round spermatids into oocytes.

    Jan Tesarik;Carmen Mendoza;Jacques Testart

  • Regulation of protein tyrosine phosphorylation in human sperm by a calcium/calmodulin-dependent mechanism: identification of A kinase anchor proteins as major substrates for tyrosine phosphorylation

    Alfonso Carrera;Jiri Moos;Xiao Ping Ning;George L. Gerton

  • Human oocyte activation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection

    J. Tesarik;M. Sousa;J. Testart;J. Testart

  • Distinction between true acrosome reaction and degenerative acrosome loss by a one-step staining method using Pisum sativum agglutinin

    C Mendoza;A Carreras;J Moos;J Tesarik

  • Nongenomic effects of 17 beta-estradiol on maturing human oocytes: relationship to oocyte developmental potential.

    J Tesarik;C Mendoza

  • ICSI in cases of sperm DNA damage: beneficial effect of oral antioxidant treatment

    Ermanno Greco;Stefania Romano;Marcello Iacobelli;Susanna Ferrero

  • Follicular fluid markers of oocyte developmental potential

    Carmen Mendoza;Estrella Ruiz-Requena;Esperanza Ortega;Nieves Cremades

  • Paternal effects acting during the first cell cycle of human preimplantation development after ICSI

    Jan Tesarik;Carmen Mendoza;Ermanno Greco

  • High-magnification ICSI overcomes paternal effect resistant to conventional ICSI.

    André Hazout;Martine Dumont-Hassan;Anne-Marie Junca;Paul Cohen Bacrie

  • Spermatid injection into human oocytes. I. Laboratory techniques and special features of zygote development

    Jan Tesarik;Carmen Mendoza

  • Polscope analysis of meiotic spindle changes in living metaphase II human oocytes during the freezing and thawing procedures

    L. Rienzi;F. Martinez;F. Ubaldi;M.G. Minasi

  • Embryos with high implantation potential after intracytoplasmic sperm injection can be recognized by a simple, non-invasive examination of pronuclear morphology

    J. Tesarik;A.M. Junca;A. Hazout;F.X. Aubriot

  • Relationship between meiotic spindle location with regard to the polar body position and oocyte developmental potential after ICSI

    L. Rienzi;F. Ubaldi;F. Martinez;M. Iacobelli

  • Restoration of fertility by in-vitro spermatogenesis.

    Jan Tesarik;Mustafa Bahceci;Cenk Özcan;Ermanno Greco

  • Paternal effects on cell division in the preimplantation embryo

    Jan Tesarik

  • Sex chromosome abnormalities after intracytoplasmic sperm injection

    I Liebaers;M Bonduelle;E Van Assche;P Devroey

Frequent Co-Authors

Mário Sousa
Mário Sousa University of Porto
Paul Devroey
Paul Devroey Vrije Universiteit Brussel
Albert Soler
Albert Soler University of Barcelona
Richard A. Anderson
Richard A. Anderson University of Edinburgh
Ilpo Huhtaniemi
Ilpo Huhtaniemi Imperial College London
Carlo Foresta
Carlo Foresta University of Padua
Gregory S. Kopf
Gregory S. Kopf University of Pennsylvania
George L. Gerton
George L. Gerton University of Pennsylvania
Ch.V. Rao
Ch.V. Rao Florida International University
Robert F. Casper
Robert F. Casper Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in healthcare can be a flexible way to advance your career or enter the medical field. For registered nurses, the question does rn to bsn require clinicals is an important one—many programs now offer pathways to earn a BSN with minimal or no hands-on clinical requirements, making it easier for busy professionals.

Aspiring nurse practitioners or those looking for leadership roles may be interested in the fastest dnp program, which allows completion of a Doctor of Nursing Practice in a shorter time. For added flexibility, some online dnp programs without dissertation are available, removing one of the major barriers to graduation.

If you are beginning your nursing journey, online options are available for licensed practical nurses too. The lpn online programs can help you enter the workforce more quickly through accelerated coursework.

Each of these alternatives provides flexibility and speed, making it easier to build a rewarding healthcare career alongside studying Medicine in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Jan Tesarik

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles