World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Immunology

D-Index
113
Citations
52387
World Ranking
426
National Ranking
38

Medicine

D-Index
113
Citations
52555
World Ranking
4910
National Ranking
484

Peter H. Howarth publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter H. Howarth sits on this spectrum.

62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 68 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientists 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62 publications 807+

This scientist: 551 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

Peter H. Howarth D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter H. Howarth sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 162 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 113 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Gene
  • Asthma

Immunology, Asthma, Allergy, Pathology and Inflammation are his primary areas of study. While the research belongs to areas of Immunology, he spends his time largely on the problem of Biopsy, intersecting his research to questions surrounding Bronchus. His Asthma study is concerned with Internal medicine in general.

His studies in Allergy integrate themes in fields like Eosinophil, Epidemiology, Guideline, Disease and Cohort. His Pathology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both In vitro and Cell adhesion molecule. His research investigates the connection between Inflammation and topics such as Nitric oxide that intersect with problems in Breathing, Exhalation and Respiratory system.

His most cited work include:

  • Mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma (DREAM): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. (1306 citations)
  • Induction of nitric oxide synthase in asthma (793 citations)
  • Interleukin-4, -5, and -6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in normal and asthmatic airways: evidence for the human mast cell as a source of these cytokines. (759 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Immunology, Asthma, Allergy, Internal medicine and Pathology. The various areas that Peter H. Howarth examines in his Immunology study include Bronchoalveolar lavage and Disease. His Asthma study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Respiratory disease, Airway and Cohort.

His research ties Corticosteroid and Allergy together. The concepts of his Internal medicine study are interwoven with issues in Gastroenterology, Placebo and Endocrinology. His work in Pathology is not limited to one particular discipline; it also encompasses Lung.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Immunology (65.03%)
  • Asthma (50.72%)
  • Allergy (16.97%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Asthma (50.72%)
  • Immunology (65.03%)
  • Internal medicine (16.36%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Asthma, Immunology, Internal medicine, Cohort and Severe asthma. Peter H. Howarth has researched Asthma in several fields, including COPD, Randomized controlled trial, Disease and Allergy. His Immunology research includes elements of Airway and Respiratory system.

His Airway research incorporates elements of Concordance and Pathology. His study in Internal medicine is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Gastroenterology and Placebo. His work carried out in the field of Cohort brings together such families of science as Difficult asthma, Age of onset, Immunoglobulin E, Spirometry and Pediatrics.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Assessment of the long-term safety of mepolizumab and durability of clinical response in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. (81 citations)
  • Moderate-to-severe asthma in individuals of European ancestry: a genome-wide association study (78 citations)
  • Effect of tralokinumab, an interleukin-13 neutralising monoclonal antibody, on eosinophilic airway inflammation in uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma (MESOS): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial (62 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Gene
  • Asthma

Peter H. Howarth mainly focuses on Asthma, Immunology, Internal medicine, Exhaled nitric oxide and Biomarker. His studies deal with areas such as Randomized controlled trial, Disease, Genome-wide association study and Allergy as well as Asthma. His studies in Immunology integrate themes in fields like Molecular genetics and Locus.

Within one scientific family, he focuses on topics pertaining to Eosinophil under Exhaled nitric oxide, and may sometimes address concerns connected to Interleukin, Respiratory system, Periostin, Immune system and Tralokinumab. His Biomarker research integrates issues from Gastroenterology, Bronchial brushing, Urinary system, Creatinine and Cohort. His research in Inflammation intersects with topics in Mast cell, Extracellular matrix, Transcription factor and Immunoglobulin complex.

Best Publications

  • Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA): Achievements in 10 years and future needs

    J. Bousquet;H. J. Schünemann;B. Samolinski;P. Demoly

  • Mepolizumab for severe eosinophilic asthma (DREAM): a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

    Ian D Pavord;Stephanie Korn;Peter Howarth;Eugene R Bleecker

  • Interleukin-4, -5, and -6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha in normal and asthmatic airways: evidence for the human mast cell as a source of these cytokines.

    P Bradding;J A Roberts;K M Britten;S Montefort

  • The ENFUMOSA cross-sectional European multicentre study of the clinical phenotype of chronic severe asthma

    B Abraham;JM Anto;E Barreiro;Ehd Bel

  • Induction of nitric oxide synthase in asthma

    Q Hamid;Springall;JM Polak;V Riveros-Moreno

  • Consensus statement * on the treatment of allergic rhinitis

    P van Cauwenberge;C Bachert;G Passalacqua;J Bousquet

  • Myofibroblasts and Subepithelial Fibrosis in Bronchial Asthma

    Charlotte E. P. Brewster;Peter H. Howarth;Ratko Djukanovic;John Wilson

  • Effect of an inhaled corticosteroid on airway inflammation and symptoms in asthma.

    Ratko Djukanović;John W. Wilson;Karen M. Britten;Susan J. Wilson

  • Immunolocalization of cytokines in the nasal mucosa of normal and perennial rhinitic subjects. The mast cell as a source of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-6 in human allergic mucosal inflammation.

    P. Bradding;I.H. Feather;S.J. Wilson;P.G. Bardin

  • Defective epithelial barrier function in asthma.

    Chang Xiao;Sarah M. Puddicombe;Sarah Field;Joel Haywood

  • Interleukin 4 is localized to and released by human mast cells

    P Bradding;I H Feather;P H Howarth;R Mueller

  • Effect of Bronchoconstriction on Airway Remodeling in Asthma

    Christopher L Grainge;Laurie C K Lau;Jonathon A Ward;Valdeep Dulay

  • Asthma in adults and its association with chronic rhinosinusitis: The GA2LEN survey in Europe

    Deborah Jarvis;Roger Newson;Jan Lotvall;Deniz Hastan

  • Involvement of the epidermal growth factor receptor in epithelial repair in asthma

    S. M. Puddicombe;R. Polosa;A. Richter;M. T. Krishna

  • Tumour necrosis factor (TNFα) as a novel therapeutic target in symptomatic corticosteroid dependent asthma

    P H Howarth;K S Babu;H S Arshad;L Lau

  • Clinical and inflammatory characteristics of the European U-BIOPRED adult severe asthma cohort

    Dominick E. Shaw;Ana R. Sousa;Stephen J. Fowler;Louise J. Fleming

  • BSACI guidelines for the management of allergic and non‐allergic rhinitis

    G. K. Scadding;S. R. Durham;R. Mirakian;N. S. Jones

  • Quantitation of mast cells and eosinophils in the bronchial mucosa of symptomatic atopic asthmatics and healthy control subjects using immunohistochemistry.

    Ratko Djukanović;John W. Wilson;Karen M. Britten;Susan J. Wilson

  • Transforming growth factor-beta 1 in asthma. Measurement in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.

    Anthony E. Redington;Jacqueline Madden;Anthony J. Frew;Ratko Djukanovic

  • T-cell cytokine profile evaluated at the single cell level in BAL and blood in allergic asthma.

    Norbert Krug;Jacqueline Madden;Anthony E. Redington;Peter Lackie

  • Epithelial-mesenchymal interactions in the pathogenesis of asthma

    Stephen T. Holgate;Donna E. Davies;Sarah Puddicombe;Audrey Richter

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen T. Holgate
Stephen T. Holgate University of Southampton
Ratko Djukanovic
Ratko Djukanovic University of Southampton
Donna E. Davies
Donna E. Davies University of Southampton
Susan J. Wilson
Susan J. Wilson University of Southampton
Ian M. Adcock
Ian M. Adcock Imperial College London
Peter J. Sterk
Peter J. Sterk University of Amsterdam
Kian Fan Chung
Kian Fan Chung Imperial College London
Norbert Krug
Norbert Krug Fraunhofer Society
Thomas Sandström
Thomas Sandström Umeå University
Christopher E. Brightling
Christopher E. Brightling University of Leicester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in studying Immunology in the USA, exploring related online degrees can provide diverse career opportunities in healthcare and research. Nursing fields, particularly those specializing in mental health, often intersect with immunological studies, making online programs an attractive option for advanced education.

Prospective students might consider enrolling in nurse practitioner programs with easy admission, which can offer a smoother entry into the healthcare sector without compromising quality. Those focusing on mental health may find top online pmhnp programs especially valuable, as they provide comprehensive clinical placements that enhance real-world experience.

Cost efficiency is also a key factor when choosing a program. Affordable pmhnp programs allow students to access quality education without incurring excessive debt, making these pathways more accessible to many.

Career prospects in nursing, particularly for those pursuing a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP), vary by location. Checking data on dnp salary by state can help graduates identify where they might earn the most and plan their careers accordingly.

Best Scientists Citing Peter H. Howarth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles