World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Daniel J. Condon publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Condon sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Daniel J. Condon D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Condon sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel J. Condon is affiliated with the British Geological Survey in the United Kingdom and focuses on research within Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their scholarly work encompasses multiple subfields including Geophysics, Paleontology, Atmospheric Science, Artificial Intelligence, and Mechanics of Materials. This multidisciplinary approach supports investigations into geological and geochemical processes, paleontological stratigraphy, and geologic mapping.

The core topics of Condon's research include:

  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
  • High-pressure geophysics and materials
  • Earthquake and tectonic studies
  • Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis

Condon's publication record features contributions to notable scientific venues with repeated appearances in:

  • Science Advances
  • Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • Earth-Science Reviews
  • Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Among recent papers authored by or including Condon are:

  • Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) U-Pb carbonate geochronology: strategies, progress, and limitations, 2020, Geochronology
  • The tempo of Ediacaran evolution, 2021, Science Advances
  • The Great Oxidation Event preceded a Paleoproterozoic "snowball Earth", 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Enhanced continental weathering and large igneous province induced climate warming at the Permo-Carboniferous transition, 2020, Earth and Planetary Science Letters
  • A Chronostratigraphic Framework for the Rise of the Ediacaran Macrobiota: New Constraints from Mistaken Point Ecological Reserve, Newfoundland, 2020, Geological Society of America Bulletin

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Condon's scientific activity. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Chuan Yang
  • Fred Bowyer
  • Diana Sahy
  • Hanbiao Xian
  • Shihong Zhang

Best Publications

  • Plesovice zircon : A new natural reference material for U-Pb and Hf isotopic microanalysis

    Jirri Slama;Jirri Slama;Jirri Slama;Jan Kosler;Daniel J. Condon;James L. Crowley

  • U-Pb ages from the neoproterozoic Doushantuo Formation, China

    Daniel Condon;Maoyan Zhu;Samuel Bowring;Wei Wang

  • Community‐Derived Standards for LA‐ICP‐MS U‐(Th‐)Pb Geochronology – Uncertainty Propagation, Age Interpretation and Data Reporting

    Matthew S. A. Horstwood;Jan Košler;George Gehrels;Simon E. Jackson

  • 238U/235U Systematics in Terrestrial Uranium-Bearing Minerals

    Joe Hiess;Daniel J. Condon;Noah McLean;Stephen R. Noble

  • Fossil steroids record the appearance of Demospongiae during the Cryogenian period

    Gordon D. Love;Gordon D. Love;Emmanuelle Grosjean;Charlotte Stalvies;David A. Fike

  • U-Pb zircon date from the Neoproterozoic Ghaub Formation, Namibia: Constraints on Marinoan glaciation

    K.-H. Hoffmann;D.J. Condon;S.A. Bowring;J.L. Crowley

  • Reassessing the uranium decay constants for geochronology using ID-TIMS U–Pb data

    Blair Schoene;James L. Crowley;Daniel J. Condon;Mark D. Schmitz

  • Geochronologic constraints on the chronostratigraphic framework of the Neoproterozoic Huqf Supergroup, Sultanate of Oman

    Samuel A Bowring;John P Grotzinger;Daniel J Condon;Jahandar Ramezani

  • Metrology and traceability of U-Pb isotope dilution geochronology (EARTHTIME Tracer Calibration Part I)

    Daniel Condon;Blair Schoene;Noah McLean;Samuel Bowring

  • A calcite reference material for LA-ICP-MS U-Pb geochronology

    Nick M. W. Roberts;E. Troy Rasbury;Randall R. Parrish;Christopher J. Smith

  • Evaluating uncertainties in the calibration of isotopic reference materials and multi-element isotopic tracers (EARTHTIME Tracer Calibration Part II)

    Noah M. McLean;Noah M. McLean;Daniel J. Condon;Blair Schoene;Samuel A. Bowring

  • Intercalibration of radioisotopic and astrochronologic time scales for the Cenomanian-Turonian boundary interval, Western Interior Basin, USA

    Stephen R. Meyers;Sarah E. Siewert;Brad S. Singer;Bradley B. Sageman

  • Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) U–Pb carbonate geochronology: strategies, progress, and limitations

    Nick M. W. Roberts;Kerstin Drost;Matthew S. A. Horstwood;Daniel J. Condon

  • Timescales of methane seepage on the Norwegian margin following collapse of the Scandinavian Ice Sheet

    Antoine Crémière;Aivo Lepland;Shyam Chand;Diana Sahy

  • Temporal constraints on the Paleoproterozoic Lomagundi-Jatuli carbon isotopic event

    Victor A. Melezhik;Hannu Huhma;Daniel J. Condon;Anthony E. Fallick

  • Duration and nature of the end-Cryogenian (Marinoan) glaciation

    Anthony Robert Prave;Daniel J. Condon;Karl Heinz Hoffmann;Simon Tapster

  • The tempo of Ediacaran evolution.

    Chuan Yang;Alan D. Rooney;Daniel J. Condon;Xian-Hua Li

  • Constraints on the numerical age of the Paleocene‐Eocene boundary

    Adam J. Charles;Daniel J. Condon;Ian C. Harding;Heiko Pälike

  • Neoproterozoic glacial-rainout intervals: Observations and implications

    D.J. Condon;A.R. Prave;D.I. Benn

  • Integrating 40Ar/39Ar, U-Pb, and astronomical clocks in the Cretaceous Niobrara Formation, Western Interior Basin, USA

    Bradley B. Sageman;Brad S. Singer;Stephen R. Meyers;Sarah E. Siewert;Sarah E. Siewert

  • Ichnological evidence for meiofaunal bilaterians from the terminal Ediacaran and earliest Cambrian of Brazil.

    Luke A. Parry;Luke A. Parry;Paulo César Boggiani;o Daniel J. Condon;Russel J. Garwood;Russel J. Garwood

  • Isotopic composition (238U/235U) of some commonly used uranium reference materials

    Daniel J. Condon;Noah McLean;Stephen R. Noble;Samuel A. Bowring

Frequent Co-Authors

Randall R. Parrish
Randall R. Parrish University of Portsmouth
Blair Schoene
Blair Schoene Princeton University
Anthony R. Prave
Anthony R. Prave University of St Andrews
Matthew S.A. Horstwood
Matthew S.A. Horstwood British Geological Survey
Stephen R. Noble
Stephen R. Noble British Geological Survey
Klaudia F. Kuiper
Klaudia F. Kuiper Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Anthony E. Fallick
Anthony E. Fallick University of Glasgow
Maoyan Zhu
Maoyan Zhu Chinese Academy of Sciences
Brad S. Singer
Brad S. Singer University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees related to Earth Science can open diverse career opportunities. Whether you’re a veteran seeking flexible education options or a senior looking for accelerated programs, the range of available online degrees caters to various needs. For instance, tailored options such as online spanish degree programs for veterans highlight the accessibility and support available for military learners pursuing new skill sets in related fields like environmental communication or resource management.

Creative applications of Earth Science knowledge can also be found in interdisciplinary degrees. Programs like those listed under best online mfa programs encourage combining scientific understanding with arts and media, expanding job possibilities in education and public outreach.

Additionally, leadership roles in environmental organizations benefit from strong management skills. The best online master degree in human resource management options can prepare Earth Science professionals to effectively manage teams and projects, fostering sustainable practices.

For those seeking quicker credentialing, one year degree programs for seniors offer accelerated pathways to enhance knowledge or pivot careers, ensuring that lifelong learners can remain competitive in the growing field of Earth Science.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel J. Condon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles