World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
65
Citations
13228
World Ranking
1427
National Ranking
143

David Selby publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Selby sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 289 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

David Selby D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Selby sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America
  • Fellow of the Geological Society of America

Overview

David Selby is affiliated with Durham University in the United Kingdom and specializes in Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on several subfields including Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence, Paleontology, Geochemistry and Petrology, and Atmospheric Science. Their research spans a broad range of topics related to geological and geochemical analysis, geochemistry and geologic mapping, as well as paleontology and stratigraphy of fossils.

The main areas of study in David Selby's work include:

  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping
  • Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
  • Earthquake and Tectonic Studies
  • Hydrocarbon Exploration and Reservoir Analysis

Frequent collaborators in Selby's research include Bradley B. Sageman, Jeremy M. Lloyd, R. E. Holdsworth, Edward D. Dempsey, and Luca Podrecca. These coauthors have worked extensively with Selby across various projects contributing to multiple publications.

Selby's research has been published in several notable venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Journal of the Geological Society
  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Chemical Geology
  • Geology
  • Geological Society of America Bulletin

Some recent representative papers authored or coauthored by Selby are:

  • "Direct coupling between carbon release and weathering during the Toarcian oceanic anoxic event," 2020, published in Geology
  • "Regional chronostratigraphic synthesis of the Cenomanian-Turonian Oceanic Anoxic Event 2 (OAE2) interval, Western Interior Basin (USA): New Re-Os chemostratigraphy and 40Ar/39Ar geochronology," 2020, published in Geological Society of America Bulletin
  • "Implications for Ediacaran biological evolution from the ca. 602 Ma Lantian biota in China," 2022, published in Geology
  • "Late Barremian / Early Aptian Re-Os age of the Ipubi Formation black shales: Stratigraphic and paleoenvironmental implications for Araripe Basin, northeastern Brazil," 2020, published in Journal of South American Earth Sciences
  • "Osmium and lithium isotope evidence for weathering feedbacks linked to orbitally paced organic carbon burial and Silurian glaciations," 2021, published in Earth and Planetary Science Letters

Throughout their career, David Selby has been recognized as a Fellow of the Geological Society of America. This award is noted without a specified year or citation.

Best Publications

  • Macroscale NTIMS and microscale LA-MC-ICP-MS Re-Os isotopic analysis of molybdenite: Testing spatial restrictions for reliable Re-Os age determinations, and implications for the decoupling of Re and Os within molybdenite

    David Selby;Robert A. Creaser

  • Giant Mesozoic gold provinces related to the destruction of the North China craton

    Jian-Wei Li;Shi-Jian Bi;David Selby;Lei Chen

  • Re-Os Geochronology and Systematics in Molybdenite from the Endako Porphyry Molybdenum Deposit, British Columbia, Canada

    David Selby;Robert A. Creaser

  • Re-Os geochronology of organic rich sediments: an evaluation of organic matter analysis methods

    David Selby;Robert A. Creaser

  • Re-Os geochronology of postglacial black shales in Australia: Constraints on the timing of “Sturtian” glaciation

    Brian Kendall;Robert A. Creaser;David Selby

  • Re-Os geochronology and coupled Os-Sr isotope constraints on the Sturtian snowball Earth

    Alan D. Rooney;Francis A. Macdonald;Justin V. Strauss;Francis Oe Dudas

  • Marine 187Os/188Os isotope stratigraphy reveals the interaction of volcanism and ocean circulation during Oceanic Anoxic Event 2

    Alice D.C. Du Vivier;David Selby;Bradley B. Sageman;Ian Jarvis

  • Constraints on the timing of Marinoan “Snowball Earth” glaciation by 187Re–187Os dating of a Neoproterozoic, post-glacial black shale in Western Canada

    Brian S. Kendall;Robert A. Creaser;Gerald M. Ross;David Selby

  • Direct Radiometric Dating of Hydrocarbon Deposits Using Rhenium-Osmium Isotopes

    David Selby;David Selby;Robert A. Creaser;Robert A. Creaser

  • Carbon sequestration in an expanded lake system during the Toarcian oceanic anoxic event

    Weimu Xu;Micha Ruhl;Hugh C. Jenkyns;Stephen P. Hesselbo

  • Re–Os geochronology of a Mesoproterozoic sedimentary succession, Taoudeni basin, Mauritania: Implications for basin-wide correlations and Re–Os organic-rich sediments systematics

    Alan D. Rooney;David Selby;Jean-Pierre Houzay;Paul R. Renne;Paul R. Renne

  • Further evaluation of the Re-Os geochronometer in organic-rich sedimentary rocks: A test of hydrocarbon maturation effects in the Exshaw Formation, Western Canada Sedimentary Basin

    Robert A Creaser;Poulomi Sannigrahi;Thomas Chacko;David Selby

  • Assessment of the 187Re decay constant by cross calibration of Re–Os molybdenite and U–Pb zircon chronometers in magmatic ore systems

    David Selby;David Selby;Robert A. Creaser;Holly J. Stein;Holly J. Stein;Richard J. Markey

  • From a long-lived upper-crustal magma chamber to rapid porphyry copper emplacement : reading the geochemistry of zircon crystals at Bajo de la Alumbrera (NW Argentina).

    Yannick Buret;Albrecht von Quadt;Christoph Heinrich;David Selby

  • Standardizing Re–Os geochronology: A new molybdenite Reference Material (Henderson, USA) and the stoichiometry of Os salts

    Richard Markey;Holly J. Stein;Judith L. Hannah;Aaron Zimmerman

  • Absolute timing of sulfide and gold mineralization: A comparison of Re-Os molybdenite and Ar-Ar mica methods from the Tintina Gold Belt, Alaska

    David Selby;Robert A. Creaser;Craig J.R. Hart;Cameron S. Rombach

  • Age and source constraints for the giant Muruntau gold deposit, Uzbekistan, from coupled Re-Os-He isotopes in arsenopyrite

    Ryan Morelli;Robert A. Creaser;Reimar Seltmann;Finlay M. Stuart

  • Redox heterogeneity of subsurface waters in the Mesoproterozoic ocean

    E. A. Sperling;A. D. Rooney;A. D. Rooney;L. Hays;V. N. Sergeev

  • Chemical composition of biotite from the Casino porphyry Cu–Au–Mo mineralization, Yukon, Canada: evaluation of magmatic and hydrothermal fluid chemistry

    David Selby;Bruce E Nesbitt

  • The Early Cretaceous Yangzhaiyu Lode Gold Deposit, North China Craton: A Link Between Craton Reactivation and Gold Veining

    Jian-Wei Li;Zhan-Ke Li;Mei-Fu Zhou;Lei Chen

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert A. Creaser
Robert A. Creaser University of Alberta
Bradley B. Sageman
Bradley B. Sageman Northwestern University
Darren R. Gröcke
Darren R. Gröcke Durham University
Kevin W. Burton
Kevin W. Burton Durham University
Jian-Wei Li
Jian-Wei Li China University of Geosciences
Chris J. Ottley
Chris J. Ottley Durham University
Robert E. Holdsworth
Robert E. Holdsworth Durham University
Daniel J. Condon
Daniel J. Condon British Geological Survey
Robert Moritz
Robert Moritz University of Geneva
Mei-Fu Zhou
Mei-Fu Zhou Chinese Academy of Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, many of which can be enhanced through complementary online degrees. For those balancing military service and education, a veteran friendly online Spanish degree may provide valuable language skills applicable in global environmental work.

Creative professionals interested in environmental communication or visual storytelling can benefit from programs like the online MFA. This degree helps develop artistic expertise suited for science outreach and education.

Earth Science graduates aiming for leadership roles should consider management-focused studies. The best online human resource management masters degree offers essential tools to manage teams and projects effectively within scientific organizations.

Finally, learning is lifelong, and the best degrees for older adults include flexible options that accommodate changing career goals and schedules, making Earth Science pathways accessible to learners at any stage in life.

Best Scientists Citing David Selby

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles