World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
32
Citations
3231
World Ranking
8770
National Ranking
411

Grant M. Cox publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grant M. Cox sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 603+

This scientist: 72 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

Grant M. Cox D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Grant M. Cox sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

Overview

Grant M. Cox is affiliated with the University of Adelaide in Australia and specializes in Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research spans several subfields, including Geophysics, Paleontology, Geochemistry and Petrology, Geology, and Artificial Intelligence. The main focus areas of their work cover Geological and Geochemical Analysis, Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils, Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis, Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, Geological and Geophysical Studies, and High-pressure geophysics and materials.

The scientist has contributed to academic publications primarily in the following venues:

  • Goldschmidt Abstracts
  • Geology
  • Nature Communications
  • Gondwana Research
  • AAPG Bulletin

Recent papers by Grant M. Cox and collaborators include:

  • Paleomagnetic constraints on the duration of the Australia-Laurentia connection in the core of the Nuna supercontinent, 2020, Geology
  • Cambro-Ordovician magmatism in the Delamerian orogeny: Implications for tectonic development of the southern Gondwanan margin, 2020, Gondwana Research
  • Gulf of Nuna: Astrochronologic correlation of a Mesoproterozoic oceanic euxinic event, 2020, Geology
  • A very unconventional hydrocarbon play: The Mesoproterozoic Velkerri Formation of northern Australia, 2022, AAPG Bulletin
  • Using Mesoproterozoic sedimentary geochemistry to reconstruct basin tectonic geography and link organic carbon productivity to nutrient flux from a Northern Australian large igneous Province, 2020, Basin Research

Frequent co-authors in their research endeavors include:

  • Morgan Blades
  • Alan S. Collins
  • Ross N. Mitchell
  • Juraj Farkaš
  • Uwe Kirscher

Best Publications

  • Snowball Earth climate dynamics and Cryogenian geology-geobiology

    Paul F. Hoffman;Paul F. Hoffman;Dorian S. Abbot;Yosef Ashkenazy;Douglas I. Benn

  • Continental flood basalt weathering as a trigger for Neoproterozoic Snowball Earth

    Grant M. Cox;Grant M. Cox;Galen P. Halverson;Galen P. Halverson;Ross K. Stevenson;Michelle Vokaty

  • Neoproterozoic iron formation: An evaluation of its temporal, environmental and tectonic significance

    Grant M. Cox;Galen P. Halverson;William G. Minarik;Daniel P. Le Heron

  • Claypool continued: Extending the isotopic record of sedimentary sulfate

    Peter W. Crockford;Peter W. Crockford;Peter W. Crockford;Marcus Kunzmann;Andrey Bekker;Justin Hayles;Justin Hayles

  • Ediacaran terrane accretion within the Arabian-Nubian Shield

    Grant M. Cox;Christopher J. Lewis;Alan S. Collins;Galen P. Halverson

  • Basin redox and primary productivity within the Mesoproterozoic Roper Seaway

    Grant M. Cox;Grant M. Cox;Grant M. Cox;Amber Jarrett;Dianne Edwards;Peter W. Crockford

  • The U-Pb age, geochemistry and tectonic significance of granitoids in the Soursat Complex, Northwest Iran

    Mahboobeh Jamshidi Badr;Alan S. Collins;Fariborz Masoudi

  • Paleomagnetic constraints on the duration of the Australia-Laurentia connection in the core of the Nuna supercontinent

    Uwe Kirscher;Uwe Kirscher;Ross N. Mitchell;Ross N. Mitchell;Yebo Liu;Adam R. Nordsvan;Adam R. Nordsvan

  • Linking the rise of atmospheric oxygen to growth in the continental phosphorus inventory

    Grant M. Cox;Timothy W. Lyons;Ross N. Mitchell;Derrick Hasterok

  • Cryogenian of Yukon

    Francis A. Macdonald;Mark D. Schmitz;Justin V. Strauss;Galen P. Halverson

  • A model for Cryogenian iron formation

    Grant M. Cox;Galen P. Halverson;André Poirier;Daniel Le Heron

  • Cryogenian glaciations on the southern tropical paleomargin of Laurentia (NE Svalbard and East Greenland), and a primary origin for the upper Russøya (Islay) carbon isotope excursion

    Paul F. Hoffman;Paul F. Hoffman;Galen P. Halverson;Galen P. Halverson;Eugene W. Domack;Adam C. Maloof

  • South Australian U-Pb zircon (CA-ID-TIMS) age supports globally synchronous Sturtian deglaciation

    Grant M. Cox;Vincent Isakson;Paul F. Hoffman;Thomas M. Gernon

  • Early Neoproterozoic Basin Formation in Yukon, Canada: Implications for the make-up and break-up of Rodinia

    Francis Alexander Macdonald;Galen P. Halverson;Justin Vincent Strauss;Emily F. Smith

  • Spatial and temporal variation in detrital zircon age provenance of the hydrocarbon-bearing upper Roper Group, Beetaloo Sub-basin, Northern Territory, Australia

    Bo Yang;Todd M. Smith;Alan S. Collins;Tim J. Munson

  • Kikiktat Volcanics of Arctic Alaska—Melting of Harzburgitic Mantle Associated with the Franklin Large Igneous Province

    Grant M. Cox;Justin V. Strauss;Galen P. Halverson;Mark D. Schmitz

  • Synthesis of the 780–740 Ma Chuar, Uinta Mountain, and Pahrump (ChUMP) groups, western USA: Implications for Laurentia-wide cratonic marine basins

    Carol Dehler;George Gehrels;Susannah Porter;Matt Heizler

  • Cambro-Ordovician magmatism in the Delamerian orogeny: implications for tectonic development of the southern Gondwanan margin

    John Foden;Marlina Elburg;Simon Turner;Chris Clark

  • Early to late Ediacaran conglomeratic wedges from a complete foreland basin cycle in the southwest São Francisco Craton, Bambuí Group, Brazil

    Gabriel J. Uhlein;Gabriel J. Uhlein;Alexandre Uhlein;Ross Stevenson;Galen P. Halverson

  • Sea ice−free conditions during the Sturtian glaciation (early Cryogenian), South Australia

    D. P. Le Heron;G. Cox;A. Trundley;A. Collins

  • Gulf of Nuna: Astrochronologic correlation of a Mesoproterozoic oceanic euxinic event

    Ross N. Mitchell;Ross N. Mitchell;Uwe Kirscher;Uwe Kirscher;Marcus Kunzmann;Yebo Liu

  • Two Cryogenian glacial successions compared: Aspects of the Sturt and Elatina sediment records of South Australia

    Daniel Paul Le Heron;Grant Cox;Anita Trundley;Alan S. Collins

Frequent Co-Authors

Galen P. Halverson
Galen P. Halverson McGill University
Alan S. Collins
Alan S. Collins University of Adelaide
Ross N. Mitchell
Ross N. Mitchell Chinese Academy of Sciences
Francis A. Macdonald
Francis A. Macdonald University of California, Santa Barbara
Zheng-Xiang Li
Zheng-Xiang Li Curtin University
Justin V. Strauss
Justin V. Strauss Dartmouth College
John Foden
John Foden University of Adelaide
Paul F. Hoffman
Paul F. Hoffman University of Edinburgh
Stijn Glorie
Stijn Glorie University of Adelaide
Boswell A. Wing
Boswell A. Wing University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA offers a wide range of career opportunities, but many learners also explore related online degrees to complement their skills. For veterans looking to transition into new fields, there are specialized programs like online Spanish degree programs for veterans, which provide valuable language skills applicable in environmental consulting and global research roles.

Creative professionals might consider exploring the intersection of art and science through best online MFA programs, ideal for those interested in communicating complex Earth Science topics using visual or media arts.

Earth Science graduates aiming for leadership or organizational roles can benefit from further education such as an online masters in human resource management, which equips professionals to manage teams in scientific institutions or environmental firms.

Additionally, the growing availability of best degrees for older adults makes it easier for learners at any stage to pursue Earth Science studies, fostering lifelong learning and career shifts in sustainable industries.

Best Scientists Citing Grant M. Cox

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles