World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Richard E. Ernst

Richard E. Ernst

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
74
Citations
24910
World Ranking
745
National Ranking
35

Richard E. Ernst publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard E. Ernst sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 385 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Richard E. Ernst D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard E. Ernst sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Igneous rock
  • Basalt
  • Paleontology

Richard E. Ernst mainly investigates Geochemistry, Mantle plume, Paleontology, Igneous rock and Mafic. He interconnects Magmatism, Large igneous province and Craton in the investigation of issues within Geochemistry. Richard E. Ernst focuses mostly in the field of Craton, narrowing it down to topics relating to Laurentia and, in certain cases, Precambrian and Proterozoic.

His Mantle plume research includes themes of Flood basalt, Geophysics, Magma chamber, Magma and Dike. His Igneous rock research incorporates elements of Phanerozoic and Mantle. His work deals with themes such as Rift and Archean, which intersect with Mafic.

His most cited work include:

  • Assembly, configuration, and break-up history of Rodinia: A synthesis (2034 citations)
  • Revised definition of Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs) (498 citations)
  • Large Igneous Provinces (384 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Richard E. Ernst mostly deals with Geochemistry, Mafic, Craton, Igneous rock and Large igneous province. His studies deal with areas such as Flood basalt, Mantle plume and Magmatism as well as Geochemistry. His Mafic research includes elements of Zircon, Rift, Ultramafic rock and Geochronology.

His studies in Craton integrate themes in fields like Precambrian, Proterozoic and Archean. The Igneous rock study combines topics in areas such as Layered intrusion, Earth science and Silicic. His Large igneous province research also works with subjects such as

  • Laurentia that intertwine with fields like Baltica,
  • Sill which is related to area like Dike.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Geochemistry (84.60%)
  • Mafic (51.70%)
  • Craton (52.48%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2019-2021)?

  • Geochemistry (84.60%)
  • Mafic (51.70%)
  • Igneous rock (36.81%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Richard E. Ernst spends much of his time researching Geochemistry, Mafic, Igneous rock, Craton and Large igneous province. His Geochemistry research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Mantle plume, Rift and Magmatism. In his study, Supergroup is inextricably linked to Baddeleyite, which falls within the broad field of Mafic.

His Igneous rock research is under the purview of Paleontology. The various areas that he examines in his Craton study include Ultramafic rock and Archean. His research in Large igneous province intersects with topics in Orogeny, Laurentia and Magma.

Between 2019 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Age correlation of Large Igneous Provinces with Devonian biotic crises (17 citations)
  • Age correlation of Large Igneous Provinces with Devonian biotic crises (17 citations)
  • Coupled supercontinent–mantle plume events evidenced by oceanic plume record (13 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Igneous rock
  • Basalt
  • Volcano

His scientific interests lie mostly in Large igneous province, Geochemistry, Paleontology, Craton and Igneous rock. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Geologic time scale, Laurentia and Earth science. Richard E. Ernst has researched Geochemistry in several fields, including Mercury and Permian.

His study in the fields of Baltica and Supercontinent under the domain of Paleontology overlaps with other disciplines such as Plume. The study incorporates disciplines such as Basalt and Petrogenesis in addition to Craton. His research in Igneous rock tackles topics such as Flood basalt which are related to areas like Baddeleyite, Ice age, Supergroup and Mantle plume.

Best Publications

  • Assembly, configuration, and break-up history of Rodinia: A synthesis

    Z.X. Li;Z.X. Li;S.V. Bogdanova;A.S. Collins;A. Davidson

  • Revised definition of Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs)

    Scott Edward Bryan;Scott Edward Bryan;Richard Ernst

  • Large Igneous Provinces

    Richard E. Ernst

  • Global record of 1600–700 Ma Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs): Implications for the reconstruction of the proposed Nuna (Columbia) and Rodinia supercontinents

    R. Ernst;Michael Wingate;Michael Wingate;Michael Wingate;K. Buchan;Zheng-Xiang Li

  • Large igneous provinces (LIPs), giant dyke swarms, and mantle plumes: significance for breakup events within Canada and adjacent regions from 2.5 Ga to the PresentThis article is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue on the the theme Lithoprobe—parameters, processes, and the evolution of a continent.Lithoprobe Contribution 1482. Geological Survey of Canada Contribution 20100072.

    Richard ErnstR. Ernst;Wouter BleekerW. Bleeker

  • Giant radiating dyke swarms on Earth and Venus

    R. E. Ernst;J. W. Head;E. A. Parfitt;E. Grosfils

  • A 1.78 Ga large igneous province in the North China craton: The Xiong'er volcanic province and the North China dyke Swarm

    Peng Peng;Mingguo Zhai;Richard E. Ernst;Jinghui Guo

  • Frontiers in large igneous province research

    Richard E. Ernst;Kenneth L. Buchan;Ian H. Campbell

  • How Large Igneous Provinces affect global climate, sometimes cause mass extinctions, and represent natural markers in the geological record

    Richard E. Ernst;Richard E. Ernst;Nasrrddine Youbi;Nasrrddine Youbi

  • RECOGNIZING MANTLE PLUMES IN THE GEOLOGICAL RECORD

    Richard E. Ernst;Kenneth L. Buchan

  • Giant radiating dyke swarms: Their use in identifying pre-Mesozoic large igneous provinces and mantle plumes

    Richard E. Ernst;Kenneth L. Buchan

  • Large mafic magmatic events through time and links to mantle-plume heads

    Richard E. Ernst;Kenneth L. Buchan

  • Evidence from magnetic fabric for the flow pattern of magma in the Mackenzie giant radiating dyke swarm

    Richard E. Ernst;W. R. A. Baragar

  • Large igneous provinces (LIPs) and carbonatites

    Richard E. Ernst;Keith Bell

  • Short-lived mantle generated magmatic events and their dyke swarms: The key unlocking Earth's paleogeographic record back to 2.6 Ga

    Wouter Bleeker;Richard Ernst

  • Long-lived connection between southern Siberia and northern Laurentia in the Proterozoic

    R. E. Ernst;R. E. Ernst;M. A. Hamilton;U. Söderlund;J. A. Hanes

  • Mantle plumes : their identification through time

    Richard E. Ernst;Kenneth L. Buchan

  • Giant Dike Swarms: Earth, Venus, and Mars

    RE Ernst;EB Grosfils;D Mège

  • Intraplate magmatism in Central Asia and China and associated metallogeny

    Franco Pirajno;Franco Pirajno;Richard E. Ernst;Alexander S. Borisenko;Alexander S. Borisenko;Geliy Fedoseev;Geliy Fedoseev

  • Large Igneous Provinces and supercontinents: Toward completing the plate tectonic revolution

    Richard E. Ernst;Wouter Bleeker;Ulf Söderlund;Andrew Craig Kerr

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulf Söderlund
Ulf Söderlund Lund University
Kenneth L. Buchan
Kenneth L. Buchan Geological Survey of Canada
Sergei Pisarevsky
Sergei Pisarevsky Curtin University
Nasrrddine Youbi
Nasrrddine Youbi Cadi Ayyad University
Michael A. Hamilton
Michael A. Hamilton University of Toronto
Dmitry P. Gladkochub
Dmitry P. Gladkochub Russian Academy of Sciences
Brian Cousens
Brian Cousens Carleton University
Simon M. Jowitt
Simon M. Jowitt University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Wouter Bleeker
Wouter Bleeker Geological Survey of Canada
Michael T.D. Wingate
Michael T.D. Wingate University of Western Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Earth Science opens doors to various interdisciplinary fields and career paths. For those looking to complement their technical expertise, exploring an online masters programs in human resource management can provide valuable skills in organizational leadership and workforce management.

Online education also caters to diverse learners, including older adults. If you are considering further study later in life, degrees specifically designed for seniors can offer flexible options without compromising quality. Check out the degrees for seniors to explore accessible programs that match your goals.

For those fascinated by the data and information side of Earth Sciences, integrating knowledge from ALA-accredited schools in library and information science is highly beneficial. Such programs offer strong standards in managing scientific literature and research data effectively.

Wondering if a is library science a good degree question aligns with Earth Science careers? The answer is yes—library science provides critical skills for organizing and preserving scientific knowledge, enhancing research capabilities across various environmental and geoscience fields.

Best Scientists Citing Richard E. Ernst

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles