What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Igneous rock
- Basalt
- Paleontology
His primary areas of study are Geochemistry, Craton, Mafic, Supercontinent and Baddeleyite.
His is doing research in Zircon, Geochronology, Laurentia, Sill and Igneous rock, both of which are found in Geochemistry.
His Laurentia study deals with Proterozoic intersecting with Precambrian, Flood basalt and Paleomagnetism.
His research integrates issues of Mantle plume, Large igneous province and Archean in his study of Craton.
His Supercontinent research is under the purview of Paleontology.
His Baddeleyite research incorporates elements of Subduction, Dike, Mineralogy, Isochron and Mantle.
His most cited work include:
- The 176Lu decay constant determined by Lu–Hf and U–Pb isotope systematics of Precambrian mafic intrusions (1735 citations)
- The isotopic composition of Yb and the precise and accurate determination of Lu concentrations and Lu/Hf ratios by isotope dilution using MC-ICPMS (403 citations)
- The isotopic composition of Yb and the precise and accurate determination of Lu concentrations and Lu/Hf ratios by isotope dilution using MC-ICPMS (403 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Geochemistry, Craton, Mafic, Baddeleyite and Geochronology are his primary areas of study.
His Geochemistry research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Large igneous province, Petrology and Proterozoic.
The concepts of his Craton study are interwoven with issues in Paleomagnetism, Precambrian and Archean.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Igneous rock, Dharwar Craton, Magmatism, Mantle and Mantle plume in addition to Mafic.
His studies deal with areas such as Felsic, Layered intrusion, Mineralogy, Olivine and Gabbro as well as Baddeleyite.
His Geochronology research includes themes of Provenance and Hornblende.
He most often published in these fields:
- Geochemistry (96.14%)
- Craton (65.22%)
- Mafic (58.45%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?
- Geochemistry (96.14%)
- Mafic (58.45%)
- Craton (65.22%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Ulf Söderlund mainly investigates Geochemistry, Mafic, Craton, Geochronology and Baddeleyite.
His Geochemistry research integrates issues from Proterozoic and Large igneous province.
The various areas that Ulf Söderlund examines in his Mafic study include Indian Shield, Paleomagnetism, Basalt and Magmatism.
Ulf Söderlund has researched Craton in several fields, including Precambrian, Igneous rock and Archean.
His work in Geochronology covers topics such as Rodinia which are related to areas like Batholith.
Ulf Söderlund has included themes like Diorite, Sill, Hornblende and Amphibole in his Baddeleyite study.
Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Emplacement ages of Paleoproterozoic mafic dyke swarms in eastern Dharwar craton, India: Implications for paleoreconstructions and support for a ∼30° change in dyke trends from south to north (30 citations)
- Emplacement ages of Paleoproterozoic mafic dyke swarms in eastern Dharwar craton, India: Implications for paleoreconstructions and support for a ∼30° change in dyke trends from south to north (30 citations)
- The 920–900 Ma Bahia-Gangila LIP of the São Francisco and Congo cratons and link with Dashigou-Chulan LIP of North China craton: New insights from U-Pb geochronology and geochemistry (27 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Igneous rock
- Basalt
- Paleontology
His primary scientific interests are in Craton, Mafic, Geochronology, Igneous rock and Geochemistry.
His Craton research is mostly focused on the topic Dharwar Craton.
Much of his study explores Mafic relationship to Baddeleyite.
His Baddeleyite research includes elements of Flood basalt, Supercontinent, Magmatism and Mantle.
Ulf Söderlund focuses mostly in the field of Geochronology, narrowing it down to matters related to Archean and, in some cases, Rodinia, Unconformity, Provenance, Proterozoic and Structural basin.
His study in Olivine and Petrogenesis falls within the category of Geochemistry.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
