What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Gene
- Internal medicine
- Enzyme
His main research concerns Immunology, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Inflammation and Asthma.
The various areas that he examines in his Immunology study include Respiratory disease, COPD, Histone deacetylase 2, Sputum and Histone.
As a member of one scientific family, Ian M. Adcock mostly works in the field of Internal medicine, focusing on Messenger RNA and, on occasion, Gene expression, Nitric oxide synthase and Cell biology.
His Endocrinology study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Receptor and Intensive care.
His research integrates issues of Biopsy and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, Signal transduction in his study of Inflammation.
The Exhaled nitric oxide research he does as part of his general Asthma study is frequently linked to other disciplines of science, such as Mechanism, therefore creating a link between diverse domains of science.
His most cited work include:
- International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma (1799 citations)
- Decreased Histone Deacetylase Activity in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (802 citations)
- Glucocorticoid resistance in inflammatory diseases (732 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of investigation include Immunology, Internal medicine, Asthma, COPD and Inflammation.
His work carried out in the field of Immunology brings together such families of science as Sputum, Lung and Disease.
His research investigates the connection with Internal medicine and areas like Endocrinology which intersect with concerns in Cytokine.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Respiratory disease, Phenotype, Intensive care medicine, Allergy and Corticosteroid in addition to Asthma.
Ian M. Adcock interconnects Pulmonary disease and Bioinformatics in the investigation of issues within COPD.
His studies deal with areas such as Oxidative stress and Pharmacology as well as Inflammation.
He most often published in these fields:
- Immunology (47.56%)
- Internal medicine (26.65%)
- Asthma (25.79%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?
- Immunology (47.56%)
- Asthma (25.79%)
- Internal medicine (26.65%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Ian M. Adcock mostly deals with Immunology, Asthma, Internal medicine, Sputum and COPD.
He works mostly in the field of Immunology, limiting it down to topics relating to Respiratory system and, in certain cases, Exhaled nitric oxide.
His Asthma research includes elements of Phenotype, Transcriptome, Allergy and Intensive care medicine.
His Internal medicine research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Gastroenterology and Oncology.
He combines subjects such as FURIN Gene, Inflammasome and Cohort with his study of Sputum.
The COPD study combines topics in areas such as Airway and Lung.
Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Management of severe asthma: a European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society guideline (104 citations)
- Moderate-to-severe asthma in individuals of European ancestry: a genome-wide association study (78 citations)
- Functional effects of the microbiota in chronic respiratory disease. (67 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Gene
- Internal medicine
- Enzyme
Asthma, Immunology, Internal medicine, Immune system and Sputum are his primary areas of study.
Ian M. Adcock has included themes like COPD, Allergy and Intensive care medicine in his Asthma study.
His research in Immunology intersects with topics in Human virome and Respiratory system.
His research in the fields of Biomarker, vitamin D deficiency and Pulmonary disease overlaps with other disciplines such as In patient.
His Immune system research integrates issues from Interleukin 33, Exacerbation, Phagocytosis and Degranulation.
His Sputum research includes themes of FURIN Gene, Furin, Bronchial brushing and Proteases.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
